Posted 20 April 2011 - 10:06 AM
I'm pretty focused on keeping this truck is the best possible running shape, as I can. That being said, when having my vent valve replaced, I had the pcm updated. It seems to run slightly better, less idle shake, but I could be fooling myself. However, my question is with regards to mileage. Prior to the update, I was getting about 18.3L/100km (yes, Canadian) now I'm at about 20.6L/100km. Does this make sense to anyone as to why this would be negatively affected? I haven't changed my driving habits or style and the physical being of the truck has been the same throughout. Same tires, same wheels, etc.
Does a pcm update take some time to re-learn operations (it's only been about a week and half since I had this done)? Will it go back to the same efficiency as before?
Can the original factory pcm configuration be restored?
Any input to this would be very much appreciated.
Thanks kindly, eh.
Posted 21 April 2011 - 09:06 AM
the computer update may have tightened up some details in the idle, that is possible. also, yes, the computer does learn - unlike some people try to insinuate the computer is constantly learning. You driving style makes a big difference in economy and one tank of fuel is not enough to judge a "change".
WARNING: Above advice is based on actual experience or just plain common sense. In the event said advise is determined to be incorrect you are entitled to a full refund of exactly what you paid for it.
2009 Sierra SLT CCSB 5.3/A6 Z71 4X4 HID | Weathertech | Truxedo Lo Pro QT | Passport 8500 | Underhood Storage | HP Tuners | Sprayed Bed Liner | Window Tint | CK951 wheels w/ Nitto Terra Grapplers | Painted Tailgate handle | Full 2" Altitude Adjustment
2003 Silverado LS ECSB 4.8/A4 2WD SOLD HID low/fog | Gibson Shorty Headers | Corsa Touring | Passport 8500 | Sprayed Liner | Billet Grille | HP Tuners | Eaton LSD | 3.73 Gear Swap | Esky Handles | Electric Fans | Center Console Swap | MTX Audio | Denali Cluster
Posted 21 April 2011 - 10:01 AM
On winter blends, mine can be low 13s, again, all other things being equal.
Yes, PCM updates could change consumption as well. All depends on what the update is/was. IF timing is impacted via the update, yes, it will impact economy. Idle quality is a function of many things, including timing, rpm at idle, and all kinds of other stuff. Quite possible that an idle quality improvement via the PCM could, indeed, impact economy elsewhere.
Engine operability is a plethura of compromises throughout the operating map. All depends on what their focus was in determining the engine control characteristics.
Back in the 91 time frame, Ford's number on customer criterion (wrt the power train) was IDLE QUALITY of the old 302. Yes, I saw the data, and it was true. Ford went so far as to sacrifice ALL KINDS of operability elsewhere via the cam to get a smooth, non-shakey, idle. Killed some mid-range performance, but it idled smooth. Good? Bad? I'll let you make the call. But, often, fuel economy is trumped by other customer wants --- ESPECIALLY for the truck market.