GM's Rebuttal For The New Fuel Efficient Ram
#1
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:19 PM
#2
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:55 PM
#3
Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:45 PM
#4
Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:50 PM
#5
Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:13 PM
I Agree, Trucks today are becoming....... Not Trucks.....(If that makes any sort of sense). They defiantly seem to be catering to the "Concrete Cowboy" as I like to call them. Trucks like these (Ah La EcoBoost, and This New Ram) Make me go a Big Rubbery One.
Why does it bother you? In order to get better mileage ani bought the 2wd versiond lower emissions, they simply make the engine more efficient. That does not mean less power, it means more power as well. There are many reasons to buy a truck these days. My truck will never intentionally go off road. It will likely never pull a trailer either. What it does do though, is allow me to be able to get in and out with my back the way it has been for 22 years now.
If you do not want the passenger type options, don't select them when you buy your next new truck. That also means no power windows or locks. No a/c, no chrome, no fancy wheels, and no stereos. Basically a truck that the city buys for their workers. They tend to get non metalic paint, and in special colours.
#6
Posted 06 April 2012 - 04:57 PM
#7
Posted 06 April 2012 - 06:48 PM
Anytime baby!
Every screw up is an opportunity not to make another one.
#8
Posted 06 April 2012 - 06:54 PM
#9
Posted 15 April 2012 - 10:07 PM
Speaking of progress, GM did make a 6.5L V8 but you probably do not want it...I love my 6.2l! If they made 6.5 I would buy that.
I am all for progress in this space and do not mind car-like features are creeping into the trucks. My first truck was a 77 Blazer with a 350. It had a solid front axle, full time 4x4 and a three speed auto. It got 8MPG on a good day. My more recent Suburban came with a whopping 230HP in the base 454 (7.4L). I believe it was rated witha torque of 340. I am not kidding you. While the best feature of the Blazer was that you could work on the engine by sitting on a fender with your feet in the engine compartment, on the frame, I do not miss it. Trucks have been redefined for the better in the past 20 years and I hope the continue to evolve, along with cars, while keeping power, the torque and the cooling capacity.
93 2500 Suburban 4x4 Whipple'd 454, Banks headers, etc
01 Mustang Cobra
#10
Posted 15 April 2012 - 11:08 PM
Speaking of progress, GM did make a 6.5L V8 but you probably do not want it...
I love my 6.2l! If they made 6.5 I would buy that.
I am all for progress in this space and do not mind car-like features are creeping into the trucks. My first truck was a 77 Blazer with a 350. It had a solid front axle, full time 4x4 and a three speed auto. It got 8MPG on a good day. My more recent Suburban came with a whopping 230HP in the base 454 (7.4L). I believe it was rated witha torque of 340. I am not kidding you. While the best feature of the Blazer was that you could work on the engine by sitting on a fender with your feet in the engine compartment, on the frame, I do not miss it. Trucks have been redefined for the better in the past 20 years and I hope the continue to evolve, along with cars, while keeping power, the torque and the cooling capacity.
Totally agree. I had a 89 Dodge Ramcharger, an 85 Blazer, and a 1996 Sierra before this. Every step has been in the right direction. My 2007 Sierra may have the nicest interior, best suspension, and most car-like ride, but it also has the best engine, power, and torque. It does everything my other cars did and more.

2007 Sierra Crew Cab SLE2 2WD, 5.3L FlexFuel
American Racing Piranha 18" wheels, Falken STZ04 285/60r18 tires
Westin Stainless Step Bars, Line-X Over-The-Rail, Magnaflow Dual-Side-Exit Exhaust
#11
Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:58 PM
Besides, the numbers they are posting have already been met.
The Ram looks nice, but none of these trucks are exactly aero,
nor should they be.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: gm, fuelefficient, fuel
2014 K2XX Platform →
2014 Chevrolet Silverado & GMC Sierra 1500 →
New lot of 2014 Silverado information/press releases from ChevroletStarted by Mervz, 07 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Vehicle Specific →
Chevy S-10/Blazer/TrailBlazer & GMC Sonoma/Jimmy/Envoy →
Severe Starter Issues (like this is bad...)Started by DaMcNastyMan, 09 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
1999-2013 GMT-800/900 →
Silverado & Sierra 1500 →
Belt Squeak/Squeal - Observations and Personal Solution (warning, kindStarted by M. Cueva, 15 Dec 2012 |
|
|
||
Marketplace →
For Sale/Wanted →
Wtb oem navigation system of 07 sierraStarted by Klaney, 10 Dec 2012 |
|
|
||
Technical & Advanced →
Wheels, Tires, & TPMS →
What offset for Fuel Hostage??Started by sdsand32885, 23 Sep 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










