Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
SouthCo

Anybody have 5.3 start consuming oil after a tune to disable AFM?

Oil consumption started after tune to disable AFM  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Did your 5.3 start consuming oil after tuning to disable AFM?

    • Yes
      0
    • No
    • It was consuming oil before the tune, but improved after.
    • It was consuming oil before the tune and still does.


Recommended Posts

Ok, I have a 2010 sierra with 5.3 and AFM. It has the LC9 with aluminum blocks and heads. So far I have just shy of 12k miles and it doesn't consume any oil. I'm thinking of tuning to get rid of AFM to head off any future problems with oil consumption.

 

Has anybody without oil consumption issues turned off AFM via a tune and still ended up consuming oil?

Edited by SouthCo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've dealt with a ton of people who have a BB tune and nobody has ever mentioned any oil consumption changes. The tune simply stops the system from activation... so the mechanical bits are all still there. Should have zero effect. Unfortunately deactivating it won't keep it from consuming oil. If it's going to happen it will - on or off.

Edited by Zembonez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking for some real world results. Most threads blame the oil consumption on afm kicking in, so that's why I wonder if anyone experienced it even with it off. I've read about oil deposits building up on bottom of deactivated pistons causing ring issues. IDK, but curious.

 

 

Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand. Not trying to rain on your thread. Just adding to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've dealt with a ton of people who have a BB tune and nobody has ever mentioned any oil consumption changes. The tune simply stops the system from activation... so the mechanical bits are all still there. Should have zero effect. Unfortunately deactivating it won't keep it from consuming oil. If it's going to happen it will - on or off.

 

 

Going to have to STRONGLY disagree with this statement. That's like saying a loaded gun lying on the table will fire on it's own because there is a round in the chamber. Unless someone pulls the trigger is will not fire.........

 

The issue with oil consumption is the blow by that is caused by the cylinder shut down when the AFM activates.

The GM service bulletin tells dealerships how to put a band aid on this by modifying some internal part of the afm system. They install a reflection shield that is meant to stop the oil blowby when it switches between modes, to help stop/slow down consumption.

With it deactivated, you are taking the blow by out of the equation because you are not allowing cylinders to shut down.

 

Here's one for you to think about...My brother has a 2010 Silverado 5.3L CC with 30,000 miles. Started using oil at 10,000 miles, about a quart between changes. Installed a Superchips tune at 17,500 and deactivated AFM. NO more oil consumption.

 

Not trying to argue but that facts are the facts. It's not hard to realize what the issue is here and it's not just GM. Trucks with AFM disabled through a tune=no oil consumption. Trucks with factory tune=oil consumption........end of story :thumbs:

Edited by BlackZ71Silverado

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To each his own I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last post since this is a poll :

 

...My post if factual NOT opinion. If the system that causes the blow by/consumption is not active, it can't cause consumption.....Funny how us guys with it tuned out don't have this problem and those with it working from the factory are seeing usage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said... you are welcome to have your opinion. What else do you want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:lurk:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO

 

All you need to do is get one look at the pistons from from a AFM engine that was using oil and you know its (AFM) the problem. The pistons in the cylinders (that shut down) overheat when they are not working and cook the oil right onto the piston and the rings. The dealers have to send those parts back to GM but one dealer friend showed me one of them once. You could hardly tell there were any rings on this piston they were so caked up with carbon. This one engine came from one of their salesman's 2008 Sierra CC. I recall he said it had about 40K miles. Trouble is, the longer the engine lives on AFM, the more the engine has to develop the deposits on the piston and rings.

 

Every AFM engine has the chance to develope this problem. The only things stopping (besides disabling) it from happening are; using better oil, or driving more aggressive (keep it in 5th gear) so AFM is used a smaller percentage of the time.

 

They are never going to do anything about it because the name of the game is fuel economy and anything that gives them any mpg improvement for CAFE is what is the most important. Oil burning is a acceptable problem as long as there are mileage improvements.

 

Don't think its just GM, I have a custome with a new Furd ecoboost, he says he uses oil?

Edited by elcamino
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO

 

All you need to do is get one look at the pistons from from a AFM engine that was using oil and you know its (AFM) the problem. The pistons in the cylinders (that shut down) overheat when they are not working and cook the oil right onto the piston and the rings. The dealers have to send those parts back to GM but one dealer friend showed me one of them once. You could hardly tell there were any rings on this piston they were so caked up with carbon. This one engine came from one of their salesman's 2008 Sierra CC. I recall he said it had about 40K miles. Trouble is, the longer the engine lives on AFM, the more the engine has to develop the deposits on the piston and rings.

 

Every AFM engine has the chance to develope this problem. The only things stopping (besides disabling) it from happening are; using better oil, or driving more aggressive (keep it in 5th gear) so AFM is used a smaller percentage of the time.

 

They are never going to do anything about it because the name of the game is fuel economy and anything that gives them any mpg improvement for CAFE is what is the most important. Oil burning is a acceptable problem as long as there are mileage improvements.

 

Don't think its just GM, I have a custome with a new Furd ecoboost, he says he uses oil?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bingo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hondas with deactivation also use oil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not trying to argue, just trying to understand. So I have two questions concerning the above theories.

 

How does a deactivated cylinder cause more blow by than an active cylinder?

The piston is traveling up and down regardless. For it to cause more blow by the deactivated cylinder would have to be allowing gasses past the rings and into the crank case. This would happen no matter if the cylinder was deactived or not.

 

What is causing the piston in a deactivated cylinder to over heat?

From what I understand the valves deactivate before the exhaust stroke trapping the combustion gases in the cylinder. This creates an "air spring" effect in that piston to counteract the friction of the piston moving up and down. The absence of a combustion event in a deactivated cylinder should more than compensate for all other thermal factors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not trying to argue, just trying to understand. So I have two questions concerning the above theories.

 

How does a deactivated cylinder cause more blow by than an active cylinder?

The piston is traveling up and down regardless. For it to cause more blow by the deactivated cylinder would have to be allowing gasses past the rings and into the crank case. This would happen no matter if the cylinder was deactived or not.

 

What is causing the piston in a deactivated cylinder to over heat?

From what I understand the valves deactivate before the exhaust stroke trapping the combustion gases in the cylinder. This creates an "air spring" effect in that piston to counteract the friction of the piston moving up and down. The absence of a combustion event in a deactivated cylinder should more than compensate for all other thermal factors.

 

 

I think what they really mean is that the cylinder/piston does not stay hot enough to heat the oil so it can run off.

 

The spring effect you mention would disapate within seconds. At 2k rpm, that cylinder's piston compresses 33 times a second. With valves not operating, every upward stroke is a compression stroke. Cylinder leakdown would eliminate the "spring effect" fast. Doubt there is any left after the first second. You may have stumbled onto something though. If they in fact trap combustion gases, those gases will leak down into crankcase. Perhaps that is causing the buildup of carbon/crap on piston?

 

BlackZ71Silverado - As for an opinion being "fact", it takes more than just anecdotal evidence to prove a fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more time............didn't say opinion = fact, go back and re-read.......I posted what my experience was with the trucks and oil consumption. It was no opinion at all that oil consumption stopped after the AFM was tuned out, it was FACT in the case I mentioned....Not hard to understand. If you like your AFM good for you, I don;t like it, it causes nothing but issues so it's tuned out, no more issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Truck Dude
      How can the Ice Alert be disabled?  I live in Wisconsin and keep my truck in a garage that stays above freezing.  So every day of the winter, on the way to work, as the temp sensor adjusts to the actual outdoor temperature, the system sends a useless and annoying ice alert that I need to dismiss.  Every day.
    • By tahoeppv
      Hey Guys,

      I have a 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe PPV with a 5.3L LMG and a 6L80 Trans (MYC) looking to drop in a 6.2L L9H. As far as I understand it is a direct swap. Would I run in to any issues or codes as far as the L9H not having AFM/DOD? I plan on using the 5.3L PCM and having it re flashed to work with the 6.2

      Or do I look for a L94 that has FlexFuel, VVT, AFM like the LMG does?
    • By BlackBearPerf
      What: Black Bear Performance Tunes (98-2016 GM vehicles only)
      Where: Somerset, NJ
      When: 12-14 July 2017
      How Much: $80 deposit for time slot, $260 at time of tune (total $340)
      ($40 discount on tune with purchase of AutoCal at the same time)
      Please go to Calendar of Events http://www.blackbearperformance.com/calendar.asp to submit your deposit.
      If folks want spare modules the prices are as follows:
      $100 - 99-07 Classic Gen-III
      $140 ECM / $50 TCM - Gen-IV Trucks and SUVs
      $279 AutoCal
      **We will need to ship out the modules before the meet for people to install them and perform the security relearn prior to being tuned.
      **2017 models cannot be tuned at an off-site event.
      **Any tune updates need to be scheduled directly with us prior to the meet by email, [email protected] Please email your update request (please include vehicle details – year, make, model, engine – along with what you would like updated). We will try our best to accommodate your request, but you will not be given a time slot, rather we will fit you into the schedule as time permits.
      **Please Note: The email address that is used to pay your deposit is the email address that we will send all correspondence to. If you would like us to use a different email address, please email me at [email protected] to notify me of the email address change.
    • By wildlyfe200
      I fell down the rabbit hole it all started with an AirRiad full intake and then I got to thinking. I need a cat-back exhaust, headers and a tune. Here is where I am at.
       
      -Borla touring dual exit - http://www.gmperformancemotor.com/parts/19303342.html
      -AirRaid full kit - https://www.airaid.com/search/product.aspx?prod=AIR-203-111
      -American Racing 1 7/8 headers and high flow cats - https://americanracingheaders.com/collections/gm-truck/products/gm-truck-6-2l-2014-up-long-system?variant=29943904900
      -Efilive flashscan V2 from Blackbear with email tune - http://store.blackbearperformance.com/EFILive-V2-Scan-and-Tune-GM_p_17.html
       
      I ordered everything but the headers I have a local shop that I feel comfortable having install headers https://www.eastcoastsupercharging.com/ and if they are installing them I will just let them order them for courtesy. They work on mostly corvettes and camaros also trucks. My only concern is the cost and I am curious as to what you guys think about two things and some help with my decision.
       
      -should I have them purchase and install the headers and "street tune" for $3149? keep in mind they are also installing the cat-back Borla exhaust which I am supplying. So $3149-$1775=$1399. minus the cost of the headers it is $1399 for the header and cat-back install and street tune.
       
      -OR find another installer that I trust to do the headers and cat back install and just use Blackbear for the tune that is included with my flashscan V2.
       
      I like the idea of having two different tunes so I can compare and see which one I like better and get to learn efilive and hopefully do some of my own tuning in the future.
       
      Please no comments why don't you install everything yourself. I did the intake and would have no problem installing that cat back but headers are out of my league.
       
      Thanks just wanted to bounce this off of you guys and see what you all thought.
    • By panflick
      For the LTZ 5.3 vs 6.2...looking at the 4dr 6.5bed...the mpg it shows on the window seems a little low for using AFM...what are your actual numbers you get? We'll say without towing, and with if ya got it...say you just bought it and went on the freeway for a few hundred miles and AFM was on, theres no way to get 18-20mpg, is there?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    191,100
    Total Topics
    2,013,378
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    157,096
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    LSNCHZ
    Newest Member
    LSNCHZ
    Joined
  • Who's Online   16 Members, 0 Anonymous, 201 Guests (See full list)

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.