Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
SouthCo

Anybody have 5.3 start consuming oil after a tune to disable AFM?

Oil consumption started after tune to disable AFM  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Did your 5.3 start consuming oil after tuning to disable AFM?

    • Yes
      0
    • No
    • It was consuming oil before the tune, but improved after.
    • It was consuming oil before the tune and still does.


Recommended Posts

Ok, I have a 2010 sierra with 5.3 and AFM. It has the LC9 with aluminum blocks and heads. So far I have just shy of 12k miles and it doesn't consume any oil. I'm thinking of tuning to get rid of AFM to head off any future problems with oil consumption.

 

Has anybody without oil consumption issues turned off AFM via a tune and still ended up consuming oil?

Edited by SouthCo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've dealt with a ton of people who have a BB tune and nobody has ever mentioned any oil consumption changes. The tune simply stops the system from activation... so the mechanical bits are all still there. Should have zero effect. Unfortunately deactivating it won't keep it from consuming oil. If it's going to happen it will - on or off.

Edited by Zembonez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking for some real world results. Most threads blame the oil consumption on afm kicking in, so that's why I wonder if anyone experienced it even with it off. I've read about oil deposits building up on bottom of deactivated pistons causing ring issues. IDK, but curious.

 

 

Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand. Not trying to rain on your thread. Just adding to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've dealt with a ton of people who have a BB tune and nobody has ever mentioned any oil consumption changes. The tune simply stops the system from activation... so the mechanical bits are all still there. Should have zero effect. Unfortunately deactivating it won't keep it from consuming oil. If it's going to happen it will - on or off.

 

 

Going to have to STRONGLY disagree with this statement. That's like saying a loaded gun lying on the table will fire on it's own because there is a round in the chamber. Unless someone pulls the trigger is will not fire.........

 

The issue with oil consumption is the blow by that is caused by the cylinder shut down when the AFM activates.

The GM service bulletin tells dealerships how to put a band aid on this by modifying some internal part of the afm system. They install a reflection shield that is meant to stop the oil blowby when it switches between modes, to help stop/slow down consumption.

With it deactivated, you are taking the blow by out of the equation because you are not allowing cylinders to shut down.

 

Here's one for you to think about...My brother has a 2010 Silverado 5.3L CC with 30,000 miles. Started using oil at 10,000 miles, about a quart between changes. Installed a Superchips tune at 17,500 and deactivated AFM. NO more oil consumption.

 

Not trying to argue but that facts are the facts. It's not hard to realize what the issue is here and it's not just GM. Trucks with AFM disabled through a tune=no oil consumption. Trucks with factory tune=oil consumption........end of story :thumbs:

Edited by BlackZ71Silverado

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To each his own I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last post since this is a poll :

 

...My post if factual NOT opinion. If the system that causes the blow by/consumption is not active, it can't cause consumption.....Funny how us guys with it tuned out don't have this problem and those with it working from the factory are seeing usage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said... you are welcome to have your opinion. What else do you want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:lurk:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO

 

All you need to do is get one look at the pistons from from a AFM engine that was using oil and you know its (AFM) the problem. The pistons in the cylinders (that shut down) overheat when they are not working and cook the oil right onto the piston and the rings. The dealers have to send those parts back to GM but one dealer friend showed me one of them once. You could hardly tell there were any rings on this piston they were so caked up with carbon. This one engine came from one of their salesman's 2008 Sierra CC. I recall he said it had about 40K miles. Trouble is, the longer the engine lives on AFM, the more the engine has to develop the deposits on the piston and rings.

 

Every AFM engine has the chance to develope this problem. The only things stopping (besides disabling) it from happening are; using better oil, or driving more aggressive (keep it in 5th gear) so AFM is used a smaller percentage of the time.

 

They are never going to do anything about it because the name of the game is fuel economy and anything that gives them any mpg improvement for CAFE is what is the most important. Oil burning is a acceptable problem as long as there are mileage improvements.

 

Don't think its just GM, I have a custome with a new Furd ecoboost, he says he uses oil?

Edited by elcamino
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO

 

All you need to do is get one look at the pistons from from a AFM engine that was using oil and you know its (AFM) the problem. The pistons in the cylinders (that shut down) overheat when they are not working and cook the oil right onto the piston and the rings. The dealers have to send those parts back to GM but one dealer friend showed me one of them once. You could hardly tell there were any rings on this piston they were so caked up with carbon. This one engine came from one of their salesman's 2008 Sierra CC. I recall he said it had about 40K miles. Trouble is, the longer the engine lives on AFM, the more the engine has to develop the deposits on the piston and rings.

 

Every AFM engine has the chance to develope this problem. The only things stopping (besides disabling) it from happening are; using better oil, or driving more aggressive (keep it in 5th gear) so AFM is used a smaller percentage of the time.

 

They are never going to do anything about it because the name of the game is fuel economy and anything that gives them any mpg improvement for CAFE is what is the most important. Oil burning is a acceptable problem as long as there are mileage improvements.

 

Don't think its just GM, I have a custome with a new Furd ecoboost, he says he uses oil?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bingo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hondas with deactivation also use oil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not trying to argue, just trying to understand. So I have two questions concerning the above theories.

 

How does a deactivated cylinder cause more blow by than an active cylinder?

The piston is traveling up and down regardless. For it to cause more blow by the deactivated cylinder would have to be allowing gasses past the rings and into the crank case. This would happen no matter if the cylinder was deactived or not.

 

What is causing the piston in a deactivated cylinder to over heat?

From what I understand the valves deactivate before the exhaust stroke trapping the combustion gases in the cylinder. This creates an "air spring" effect in that piston to counteract the friction of the piston moving up and down. The absence of a combustion event in a deactivated cylinder should more than compensate for all other thermal factors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not trying to argue, just trying to understand. So I have two questions concerning the above theories.

 

How does a deactivated cylinder cause more blow by than an active cylinder?

The piston is traveling up and down regardless. For it to cause more blow by the deactivated cylinder would have to be allowing gasses past the rings and into the crank case. This would happen no matter if the cylinder was deactived or not.

 

What is causing the piston in a deactivated cylinder to over heat?

From what I understand the valves deactivate before the exhaust stroke trapping the combustion gases in the cylinder. This creates an "air spring" effect in that piston to counteract the friction of the piston moving up and down. The absence of a combustion event in a deactivated cylinder should more than compensate for all other thermal factors.

 

 

I think what they really mean is that the cylinder/piston does not stay hot enough to heat the oil so it can run off.

 

The spring effect you mention would disapate within seconds. At 2k rpm, that cylinder's piston compresses 33 times a second. With valves not operating, every upward stroke is a compression stroke. Cylinder leakdown would eliminate the "spring effect" fast. Doubt there is any left after the first second. You may have stumbled onto something though. If they in fact trap combustion gases, those gases will leak down into crankcase. Perhaps that is causing the buildup of carbon/crap on piston?

 

BlackZ71Silverado - As for an opinion being "fact", it takes more than just anecdotal evidence to prove a fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One more time............didn't say opinion = fact, go back and re-read.......I posted what my experience was with the trucks and oil consumption. It was no opinion at all that oil consumption stopped after the AFM was tuned out, it was FACT in the case I mentioned....Not hard to understand. If you like your AFM good for you, I don;t like it, it causes nothing but issues so it's tuned out, no more issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Martiallterrain
      Hey guys I’m new to the forum but I’ve been a long time subscriber since I bought my 14 Sierra new in feb 2014. So I’ve read lots of horror stories on the site and I thought I’d tell you guys about my experience.
       
      A few weeks ago over 5r holidays, my girlfriend and I were returning a uhaul after moving and she was following in my truck, she called to say that the check engine light was on and the truck had reduced power. We dropped off the uhaul and I hopped in and could tell it was misfiring and had a rough idle. I took it to my local mechanic and he told me cylinder 4 was misfiring and he tried a coil pack but that didn’t fix it, he did a compression test and it was holding compression but he told me this was gonna be a bigger problem.
       
      luckily I still had powertrain warranty so I contacted the dealership that I bought the truck from and they had me tow it there using gm roadside. So my first hats off to gm, the lady I had on the phone from roadside assistance asked her manager to waive the tow fee as I was having it towed to my home dealership that was > than the 50 miles that they cover for free. 
       
      Once the truck made it to the dealership, it only took the. A couple of hours to figure out I had a failed lifter and broken rod for cylinder #4. Now I was freaking out because I’ve read horror stories on this site about having to argue with regional managers for warranty work this significant and I’ve heard dealerships arbitrarily saying work isn’t covered under warranty for whatever reason. Thankfully I can say  my service advisor set me up with a rental the same day and reassured me that everything would be covered by gm. He did say parts were on backorder and it would take approx 2 weeks. Almost 2 weeks to the day, truck was ready to be picked up with 0 hassle the entire time. 
       
      This is my 3rd truck with the 5.3 and the only time I’ve had a significant mechanical issue. The truck only had 85000 km (around 50k miles) sure I was PO’d that my truck was out of commission for 2 weeks but I was extremely thankful that gm stood behind their product and was able to fix the truck for me. The truck seems to run fine now but I don’t know if I will keep it as I don’t know if it will be the same or if the issue will reoccur. I do know that my next truck will definite be another Chevy or Sierra. I can’t wait to see the reveal of the new Chevy this weekend at Detroit!
       
      Jut thought I would post a positive warranty repair story and throw a kudos out to gm for making things right with me
    • By ObscureGlock
      Hello everyone, welcome to my build thread! This thread will be updated as I go. If you have any questions and/or concerns, feel free to comment below or PM me. Thanks, I hope y’all like it!
      At the same time, I’m also trying to find a fix to a lot of issues with the truck. Many that others are experiencing as well, and some that seem to be isolated, so stay tuned. I’d love to hear your solutions to common problems found on our trucks.
       
      The story began when I brought her home on the night of January 3rd, 2017...
       
      Current Mods (as of 01/08/2017):
      - Black factory Bow Ties
      - 20% Suntek Films tint on front windows
      - 65% tint on windshield
      - AuxBeam LED Low Beams, High Beams, and Fog Lights
      - AuxBeam 3" LED RGB Cubes
      - MHtech LED Reverse Bulbs
      - MHtech LED Cargo Bulbs
      - Adaptive Valve left open with picture frame wire until I do my exhaust
      - Rear Wheel Valence delete
      - Step Bar delete
      - AIRAID MIT + K&N HIGH FLOW FILTER
      - Hankook Ventus ST RH06 285/45/R22
       
      Planned Mods:
      COSMETIC
      - 5% tint all around
      - 50% Windshield tint + 5% strip
      - Front Valence Delete
      - Color Matched Bumpers
      - New Generation Tow Mirrors
      - Rear Window 3-Piece to Single-Piece conversion
      PERFORMANCE
      - Flowmaster 40 Series Original, resonator and flapper delete
      - K&N cabin air filter
      - Oil Catch Can
      - CAI Enclosed Box
      - Diablo inTune i3 (or Trinity)
      - Rear Traction Bars
      - High performance driveshaft
      LIGHTING
      - License Plate LED bulbs
      - Footwell LED Lighting, Front & Rear
      - 30” LED light bar behind grille
      AUDIO/Misc
      - Bose (or Focal) Audio Upgrade with a ported 10” subwoofer
      - Escort Passport radar detector
      - Blackvue front and rear dash cams
      SUSPENSION
      - 3.5” Lift Kit
      - 20x10 -24 Fuel Maverick D610
      - 33s (haven’t decided what type of tire or brand I’m going with yet)
       
      Mechanical Points:
      - Running on Castrol High Performance Full Synthetic Oil
      - Fueled with 93 Octane
       
      Cleaning Products:
      Limitless Car Care (coupon code in signature)
      - Waterless Wipe
      - Swift Shine
      Meguiars
      - Gold Class Shampoo & Conditioner
      - Hot Shine tire coating
      Armor All
      - Interior Original Protectant
      Other
      - Formula 88 Cleaner & Degreaser
      - WD-40 (gives my black hitch a nice little Shine, hides the rust marks from my trailer coupling)
      Tools I Use 
      - Fasmov Foam Cannon
      - Microfiber Sponge and Towels
      - Leaf Blower followed by a microfiber dry
       
      Congratulations on making it this far, I’m proud of you. LOL.







    • By im_jeremy5
      A few months ago I bought a 2007 GMC Sierra (new body) with 150,000 miles on the clock. It has the LH6 in it. It has since gotten cold outside and when I start it in the mornings It has what I am sure is a rod knock. It goes away after the engine warms up. It has good oil pressure. I have always been a ford guy and wasn't too familiar with these engines otherwise I would have avoided these early AFM engines like the plague. It sounds a lot "deeper" than a lifter click. I have removed the valve covers and confirmed that I don't have a collapsed lifter or flattened cam. The thing consumed over a quart of oil in the last 2,000 miles. I had a cylinder 1 misfire and when I pulled the plug it was pitted and the porcelain was cracked showing tons of detonation. I replaced the plug and that fixed the misfire. All the other plugs look great. 
       
        Onto my question.  With all these issues an the reputation of these AFM lifters and oil consumption I kinda want to get ahead of it and plan on putting an engine in it. This is my daily driver so i need to minimize down time. I was looking to get a block and get it ready to go in the truck (as money permits) so there is no huge rush or surprises. The problem is these specific LH6 Aluminum blocks were only used from 2005-2009 and are not the easiest/cheapest to find. The LY5 however is the iron counterpart to it and cheap and easy to find since they produced them 2007-2014 and were more common. I don't care about the 100lbs. Does everything bolt up? And would the computer freak out? I plan on eliminating the AFM and putting some trustworthy lifters and a cam in it so I will need some computer work done anyways hopefully it can be programmed enough to handle a different block? Would someone with HP Tuners be able to do the computer work or does the whole thing need to be sent off/replaced?. I've rebuilt a few engines It's just this computer stuff that gets kinda hayzey. If I am deleting the AMF is there another Gen IV block that would work for this application? Screw it and get a 6.0 and stroke it? 
    • By ElJefeBlanco
      I think I've narrowed my tuner purchase down to one of these two options.
       
      What do you guys think and why?
      Got a better option? I'm all ears.
       
       
    • By The.Sundae.Drive
       
       
      I have had the Elite Engineering E2 Catch Can on my 2014 Silverado for about 8100 miles and just performed my first oil change since it was installed. (Don't worry, I use Mobil 1 Annual Protection). Shocked is an understatement of my reaction when I discovered how much oil my truck is burning. After seeing how much was captured by the Catch Can, I am very glad I decided to install one. I have run a catch can in my Camaro for several years and it captured far less oil between changes so I was very surprised with how much was captured this time. After doing this first check - up on the catch can, I now plan to check the can much more frequently (every 2,000 miles or so) to see how much is being captured. I will be uploading some additional follow up reviews on the catch can and how it is performing. Overall, I am completely satisfied with my purchase and will be purchasing from Elite Engineering again. Note that this engine is shared among many GM platforms such as the Silverado, Sierra, Yukon, Suburban, Tahoe, Express, etc.
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    192,867
    Total Topics
    2,032,619
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    160,359
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Chris Talbot
    Newest Member
    Chris Talbot
    Joined
  • Who's Online   41 Members, 0 Anonymous, 286 Guests (See full list)

  • Popular Now

  • Choose your favorite 2019 trim level   142 members have voted

    1. 1. Which trim level do you want to buy your 2019 Silverado in?


      • Work Truck
      • Custom
      • Custom Trailboss
      • LT
      • RST
      • LT Trailboss
      • LTZ
      • High Country

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic
  • Popular Contributors

  • Images

  • My Clubs

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.