Jump to content



Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

2014 Chevrolet Silverado towing test - Ike Gauntlet


41 replies to this topic

#1 2009 GMC

2009 GMC

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 520 posts
  • Location:7000ft Arizona
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 August 2013 - 07:14 PM

Crew cab 4x4 5.3 3:08 gears



Kind of hard to watch :-(

Edited by 2009 GMC, 30 August 2013 - 07:15 PM.

1979 Chevrolet Silverado K10 4x4 400 T350 3.73 35" BFGs Regular cab Short Bed
1991 Audi 90 Quattro 20V 5cyl www.20v.org

1997 Chevrolet Silverado K1500 4x4 5.7 4L60e 3:73 14 Bolt Rear Extended cab 3rd Door


#2 Prdtrgttr

Prdtrgttr

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 105 posts
  • Location:Lethbridge, Alberta
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 August 2013 - 07:30 PM

I watched the review somewhat aghast, amazing what a difference gears and ratios make...

2014 Chevrolet Silverado Crew Cab LT /Z71 Truxxx lift/levelling kit/275 70 R18Toyo Open Country AT's  XD Diesel Rims


#3 2009 GMC

2009 GMC

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 520 posts
  • Location:7000ft Arizona
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 August 2013 - 07:36 PM

keep in mind this is an extreme towing test

 

  • at max tow ratings (3:08 gears) when you add in passengers
  • towing up at least 7% grade
  • towing at altitude where you loose up to 30% hp / torque

1979 Chevrolet Silverado K10 4x4 400 T350 3.73 35" BFGs Regular cab Short Bed
1991 Audi 90 Quattro 20V 5cyl www.20v.org

1997 Chevrolet Silverado K1500 4x4 5.7 4L60e 3:73 14 Bolt Rear Extended cab 3rd Door


#4 MikeNH

MikeNH

    Senior Enthusiast

  • Moderator
  • 6,724 posts
  • Name:Mike
  • Location:Michigan
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:2011 Silverado 1500

Posted 30 August 2013 - 07:48 PM

Hardly hard to watch. You take the highest ratio GM offers with a mid lime motor and pit against Ford's best motor for the test with 3.73s and the Tundra with 4.30s and I'd say it did pretty good. Plus, while I haven't watched their other tests I think they really hurt the time by trying to keep RPMs down so the truck loses speed. But damn is that a sweet sounding exhaust note! I may not have to buy an exhaust system when I get mine.

#5 rdnckhntr94

rdnckhntr94

    Jack of all trades, master of breaking anything I touch...

  • Member
  • 1,817 posts
  • Name:CJ
  • Location:Stafford, VA
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:02 Silverado 5.3L

Posted 30 August 2013 - 08:06 PM

If it had 3.73's and the 6.2 it would have blown the ecoboost and tundra away


First tow on 4.88's

 

4.88's, K&N, Spin Tech Sportsman 9000, 5000K lows, Hella FF75 fogs (w/ 5000K HID conversion), Cleared Headlights, Anzo USA parks, 05 Tails, Tows (levelled), BullyDog, 7" McGaughy's, 3" PA Body, Dominator II nerfs, 35's on 17's, Energy Suspension Bushings, FAL e-fans, 34" radiator, Dual rear piston calipers, 05+ front brakes, EBC green stuff pads and rotors, Goodridge brake hoses, Hydroboost, Sony HU and mono amp, Polk Audio speakers, dual 12's, "Big 3" upgrade, 200amp alternator, Blue LED interior lights, Weathertech... Want: 37's on 20's, Body Work & Paint Job


#6 2009 GMC

2009 GMC

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 520 posts
  • Location:7000ft Arizona
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 August 2013 - 08:56 PM

Hardly hard to watch. You take the highest ratio GM offers with a mid lime motor and pit against Ford's best motor for the test with 3.73s and the Tundra with 4.30s and I'd say it did pretty good. Plus, while I haven't watched their other tests I think they really hurt the time by trying to keep RPMs down so the truck loses speed.


But damn is that a sweet sounding exhaust note! I may not have to buy an exhaust system when I get mine.

They did say that truck configuration was the only one they could get from GM. Maybe next time they can test a 5.3 with 3:42 or like you said (and they mention in the video) 6.2 and 3:73

As far as keeping the RPM's down thats the fault of the 3:08S. They were not exceeding the 60 mph speed limit and leaving the shifting up to the truck like all the other tests. :-)

Edited by 2009 GMC, 30 August 2013 - 09:00 PM.

1979 Chevrolet Silverado K10 4x4 400 T350 3.73 35" BFGs Regular cab Short Bed
1991 Audi 90 Quattro 20V 5cyl www.20v.org

1997 Chevrolet Silverado K1500 4x4 5.7 4L60e 3:73 14 Bolt Rear Extended cab 3rd Door


#7 HD2007

HD2007

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 292 posts

Posted 31 August 2013 - 01:03 AM

This is a true showing of what rear end gears can do - people watching and posting in the thread on rear end gears and wheel/tire combos.

I have noticed when trying to configure these trucks - you can't seem to get the z71 stuff and towing stuff - like the larger mirrors.

I would like to see the 3.73 gear set with the 5.3 - that would really put that engine in a sweet spot RPM wise.

I currently tow a 6000 lb Travel Trailer with my 2500HD 6.0L 6sp 4.10 gears - I love to climb hills in 4th gear - 3500 RPM 55 MPH.

#8 BringTheRain403

BringTheRain403

    Senior Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 1,109 posts
  • Location:Pittsburgh PA
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:2014 GMC Sierra Z-71 SLT

Posted 31 August 2013 - 06:47 AM

I posted this in the thread about the gears about the same time he posted this. The dude claiming that the 3.08 gears were perfect for this truck made me lol Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Edited by BringTheRain403, 31 August 2013 - 06:47 AM.


#9 KMGZ400

KMGZ400

    Senior Enthusiast

  • Moderator
  • 5,331 posts
  • Location:Pennsylvannia
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 September 2013 - 03:06 PM


Hardly hard to watch. You take the highest ratio GM offers with a mid lime motor and pit against Ford's best motor for the test with 3.73s and the Tundra with 4.30s and I'd say it did pretty good. Plus, while I haven't watched their other tests I think they really hurt the time by trying to keep RPMs down so the truck loses speed. But damn is that a sweet sounding exhaust note! I may not have to buy an exhaust system when I get mine.

 

 

agreed... stupid that they would bring a truck with 3.08's....... they make 3.42's an option for a reason


Edited by KMGZ400, 01 September 2013 - 03:06 PM.

image_V1MHcoloredsized_zpsa15e91fd.jpg
2014 GMC Sierra Denali 2500 CCSB 4x4 LML 3.73 G80

2013 Chevrolet Silverado LTZ 1500 ECSB 4x4 5.3 3.08 G80
2012 Chevrolet Cruze eco 1.4T M-6

2012 Nissan NV3500 S 5.6 3.54


#10 MikeNH

MikeNH

    Senior Enthusiast

  • Moderator
  • 6,724 posts
  • Name:Mike
  • Location:Michigan
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:2011 Silverado 1500

Posted 01 September 2013 - 03:14 PM

They did say that truck configuration was the only one they could get from GM. Maybe next time they can test a 5.3 with 3:42 or like you said (and they mention in the video) 6.2 and 3:73

As far as keeping the RPM's down thats the fault of the 3:08S. They were not exceeding the 60 mph speed limit and leaving the shifting up to the truck like all the other tests. :-)

 

Thanks for the clarification, I didn't realize they had a set speed in mind. I realize its an attempt at consistency but they were being passed left and right at that speed and what I've done before when driving even regular cars that were gutless in the mountains was leave it in highest gear that was still responsive and let the engine scream. Modern cars and trucks aren't going to get damaged by that and especially these trucks seem to have excellent cooling systems so overheating shouldn't be a concern.



#11 HD2007

HD2007

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 292 posts

Posted 01 September 2013 - 04:12 PM

I have not seen the other videos either - but I wonder how close to Max they ran the other trucks - The poor Chevy was probably right at its CGWR - were the other's that close.

 

I am glad that they admitted that this was not the preferred way to do the test  and that they really could not compare the trucks under load.

 

I would like to see the same test with either the 5.3 /w/ 3.73 or perhaps the 6.2 with 3.42



#12 kstruckcountry

kstruckcountry

    Elite Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 5,214 posts
  • Name:#dantheman
  • Location:Hills
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:Vehicles usually

Posted 01 September 2013 - 04:19 PM

You're not going to lose 30% power up high. I've had my 2006 9k+ feet, and the power loss isn't even noticable. Modern engines don't care.


67ce74f9-6c87-48ab-963b-13c795e1766d_zps
2006 Silverado Z71 LT2 / Bilstein 5100's / Magnaflow 22" / AirAid MIT / BBP Tune / Edge Insight monitor

GMC 17" Wheels / Cooper Discoverer ATP / Hella FF75's / TS front end replacement / Access cover

"I've got an attractive woman burning down my house too darrick"


#13 Joe_K

Joe_K

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 517 posts
  • Drives:2014 Silverado

Posted 01 September 2013 - 09:51 PM

I bet the results would be different if they rerun the test when the NHT package is available, with both the 5.3 and the 6.2.



#14 white1500

white1500

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 684 posts
  • Location:Arizona
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:2000 Silverado 1500 Ext. Cab

Posted 02 September 2013 - 03:21 AM

Holy moly that truck was suffering with that axle ratio. GM are shooting themselves in the foot by allowing the press to use these weak axles, because even if they do inform us of it in the video, the general population doesn't acknowledge it and thinks that GM can't tow.

 

They should have put a lot of effort into having the 3.73 or lower ready for early press tests such as these. Everything that has been done in previous videos has been a walk in the park and the 3.08 was good enough.

 

And I can't stand tests with different engines, axle ratios, cab configurations, tires, etc. It's completely pointless.


Edited by white1500, 02 September 2013 - 03:23 AM.

5.3L, 3:73 gears, and 2WD.


#15 crushNchowda

crushNchowda

    Enthusiast

  • Member
  • 469 posts

Posted 02 September 2013 - 07:51 AM

Wow. Anything but strong. Why on earth would GM even send a 5.3L truck to that test? GM should have passed on this test until a truck engine that was more focused on working than a 5.3L with the 3.08 rear end. I doubt the 3.42 would have done much better with the new 5.3 engine. This test makes it look like the GM trucks need the 3.73 & 6.2 for anything more than grocery bags.

The 3.08 rear end may not be ideal, but the 5.3 is absolutely the "working" engine for this truck, there is no doubt it'll be the one used most by those who "work" their trucks. The 6.2 is not going to be a mass production setup.

Also I find it amusing how all of a sudden 355hp383tq is all of a sudden not enough - majority of people posting on this site are running around in weak ass 315hp trucks, he'll the new 5.3 isn't far off in power from the outgoing 6.2

Edited by crushNchowda, 02 September 2013 - 07:53 AM.

'14 Sierra CC SLT 4WD All-Terrain 5.3 w 3.42s/black/black factory 20"s/weathertech mats&rain visors/Flowmaster Catback




Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users