Jump to content

Fuel MPG in the 6.0 engine?


Recommended Posts

anyway, you know what costs more than gas? replacing your truck. with the reliability of the 6.0, 6l90, and the gm hd trucks overall, if you replace it chances are you did so because you wanted to, not because you needed to. that is worth a few mpg in my book.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Driving down the road with the cruise set @ 62 playing with a camera....priceless.

Don't know what you're looking at, but the cruise isn't set. Can't even tell that he's moving, just that it's at 13-1400rpm.

How's the view from that pedestal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know what you're looking at, but the cruise isn't set. Can't even tell that he's moving, just that it's at 13-1400rpm.

How's the view from that pedestal?

I'm pretty sure he is moving. My mpg gauge only shows mpg when moving, it shows a -.- or something when stopped. He may be going like 5 or 10 mph though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure he is moving. My mpg gauge only shows mpg when moving, it shows a -.- or something when stopped. He may be going like 5 or 10 mph though.

I couldn't say one way or the other on that, I never look at that screen. I just use the trip screen or whatever it is. I'm not too terribly interested if he is or not anyways
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So an interesting fact on gas mileage. My 2006 8.1 litre used to use 26 litres per 100 km when pulling my cargo trailer. My 2016 6.0 used 29.9 litres per 100 km when pulling a cargo trailer this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drug a trailer for the first time with this truck. We did a 300 mile round trip through low mountains, speeds 60-70, trailer is a 14' enclosed cargo and weighed just over 3200 pounds today. DIC showed 10.5 mpg, my calculation at fillup showed it to be 10.7 mpg.

Edited by Dale L
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So an interesting fact on gas mileage. My 2006 8.1 litre used to use 26 litres per 100 km when pulling my cargo trailer. My 2016 6.0 used 29.9 litres per 100 km when pulling a cargo trailer this week.

Sounds like GM needs to come out with a direct injected big block. 7.4 or 8.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like GM needs to come out with a direct injected big block. 7.4 or 8.1

No, I don't like direct injection. Had it on my 2014 1/2 ton.

Nothing to clean the oil mist off the intake valves when the fuel is direct injected. And gm wants $200 every 40,000 km to fog the intake to do it. We just need the old tried and true big block again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at it this way - the money I would spend on maintenance with a diesel or high-tech gas engine I just wind up spending in gas instead with the 6.0. But at least I save myself the hassle of dealer appointments and such.

 

 

There's a lot that can be said about reliability. :)

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like GM needs to come out with a direct injected big block. 7.4 or 8.1

I doubt any new direct injected or turboed engine will be any better on gas when in a 2500 or 3500 environment. If it was they would already have introduced it. Take the almighty 6.2- very powerful and fuel efficient in a 1500 application- still may need excessive maintenance for a reliable emgine. In a 2500 or 3500 application where maintenance may be neglected somewhat failures would be common. If I'm wrong then GM is in cahoots with the oil companies or the 6.2 and direct injection isn't worth the failures they know that they would deal with.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think GM is more in cahoots with the fleet buyers who pick up most of the 2500/3500 production. Fleet buyers want reliability and low maintenance requirements. They are not into the latest and greatest goofy stuff that seems to cause the private sector to swoon. Ag and construction buyers are also in the fleet mindset. While I might have jumped the gun a little in doing so, but I bought my 2015 2500 6.0 because I was concerned that GM would screw things up for 2016, since they had already changed things in the 1500 lineup.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sounds like GM needs to come out with a direct injected big block. 7.4 or 8.1

You can keep your direct injection, carboned up valves requiring the heads to be removed for cleaning does not sound fun.

 

Give me a 7.0 version of the 6.0, beef the 6L90E up and tune it so it doesn't shift flair, add 4.68 gears so it has even more power getting out of the hole and 6th gear becames half way useable.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    246k
    Total Topics
    2.6m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    333,598
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Kenny18Gmc
    Newest Member
    Kenny18Gmc
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 712 Guests (See full list)




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.