Jump to content


GM Working Hard To Offer Less Car For the Money - Weight Reduction

gm weight nempa

3 replies to this topic

#1 Gorehamj


    News Contributor

  • Contributing Writer
  • 644 posts
  • Name:John Goreham
  • Location:Boston Providence
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:16 Subaru Forester, '07 Highlander V6 AWD

Posted 05 June 2017 - 10:49 AM

GM lightweit presentation my image Charkie Klein.jpg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com

At a recent New England Motor Press Association (NEMPA) annual meeting at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), a representative from General Motors went deep on the topic of lightweighting. Charlie Klein, Executive Director, Global CO2 Strategy, Mass and Aerodynamics, for General Motors, wowed the group by pointing to steel, not necessarily aluminum, as a very common solution to adding lightness to vehicles. Although magnesium, composite plastics, and aluminum do play a significant role in modern automotive design, more and more advanced steel is the go-to solution for reducing mass cost effectively, while still maintaining platform rigidity and safety.

2017-05-25 12.56.04.jpg

As the top of page chart highlights, General Motors has taken out hundreds of pounds of mass on every one of its popular models over the past vehicle generation. What Mr. Klein emphasized was that GM did this while steering straight into "headwinds" of increased safety requirements, infotainment and active safety electronics weight additions, and ever-increasing customer expectations of greater rigidity (which is felt by the driver as a premium feel on the road).


Among the technologies that GM has invented and patented in the past decade, the one that most impressed the group was GM's ability to spot-weld steel to aluminum. The group immediately had questions on how corrosion of the dissimilar metals was managed, but Klein assured the group it was part of the process and is now in production on the CT6.


Klein also showed how GM is making structural body segments (beneath the skin) more cost effectively, lighter, and more rigid by reducing parts. Kelin's example was the rear support section behind the rear wheel well. On the ATS that section has a dozen or more components. On the CT6, it is a single piece.  

#2 Daryl Z71

Daryl Z71

    Like A Rock

  • Moderator
  • 10,113 posts
  • Name:Daryl
  • Location:Pennsylvania
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:2006 Silverado Z71

Posted 05 June 2017 - 12:26 PM

Very interesting.

2006 Silverado Z71


#3 mookdoc6



  • Member
  • 969 posts
  • Name:Mook
  • Location:Phoenix
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:2016 GMC Sierra SLT CC

Posted 05 June 2017 - 01:34 PM

I think most people would be surprised where GM was in the last 20 years on accepted Patents for the company? Usually #1,2, or 3 year after year.......Ferd is up there too.......But man I can't stand Ferd's......

#4 barry G

barry G


  • Member
  • 870 posts
  • Name:barry
  • Location:maine
  • Gender:Male
  • Drives:1996 sierra sle 5speed 4x4

Posted 13 June 2017 - 08:29 PM

that aluminum interaction makes sense.

bauxite is simply iron, silica and alumina.. always found together.


aluminized pipes rust fast as aluminum hydrates...gives off weird gas to any chemical  (like coolant)


I'd just stay more steel, and make a unique alloy.


not sure why aluminum is such a focus. I was an aircaft mechanic.. I simply grew to hate the aluminum.

tip toe around it. always theorizing what weather will do what to it..

it just sucks.




Reply to this topic


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users