Jump to content

Did GM make the new pickup's box sizes shorter? YES they did!!!


Recommended Posts

I was just browsing the GMC website on the 2019 sierra. Under the interactive tab it shows different colors, 360 degree view ect. I just discovered they gave some specifications of the new truck.......... (crew cab short box and crew cab standard box). The bed lengths have now gotten a lot smaller.

2019 Silverado/Sierra Crew cab                                                           2018 Silverado/Sierra Crew cab

Short Bed  63.3"(5'3")------------------------------------------------------------------------------------69.3"(5'8")
Standard Bed  69.3"(5'8")------------------------------------------------------------------------------78.87"(6"6")

Does anyone see the problem?

 

10.png

11.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These were talked about in another thread.

 

If they were correct, it would be smaller than a canyon....???

 

The interview TFL did at the autoshow, the gm guy was talking about it 'only' being about 1" longer, but giving a couple inches more usable space in cab/box, by making the engine compartment smaller. 

 

 

Hopefully we'll see 'correct' dimensions soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this in the below thread. These specs are incorrect. A Tahoe is 204’” long and a suburban is 224 for comparison. New trucks should be 1 - 2” longer than current gen. They said this at Silverado reveal. Increased cab space by 3” but overall length only 1 - 2” due to moving wheels more forward and aft along with a shorter engine bay. 

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/208803-2019-t1xx-interior-exterior-dimensions-vs-pervious-generations/

Edited by 2009GMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the TFL video on the new Sierra and they went over the new plastic bed - the GM engineer referred to it a s the 5'3" bed associated with the crew cab models.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope this isn't so.  If it is then looks like I will be going to a 2500 as well.  GM is messing up if they went to a shorter bed. 
I agree. Although if you look at the progression of pickup truck evolution they've become less and less utilitarian and more of a yuppie status symbol. Part of the reason I went back to a double cab and 6 -1/2' bed was that the 5'8" was too hard to work with. Finding a used crew cab with the bigger bed and 6.2 wasn't going to happen either.
We don't need more room on the inside... There's enough as it is and I have two kids that ride back there. (At least with my crew cab).



Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.