Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Gorehamj

Ford Announces 2018 F-150 3.0L Power Stroke Turbo Diesel & More

Recommended Posts

The 3.3 na has 80 something more hp than my 1990 sierra w 5.7 had. Theres nothing wrong with a v6 in a truck these days. Most people have trucks that are way overkill.

 

I was tempted by the ecoboost but concerns about long term reliability and looks pushed me towards a 5.3 sierra.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not mad at all! More confused really....I have seen one engine come and go over the years at FERD only to see another engine come and go? Really, remember the 3 valve jokes? Innovation at FERD would be.....How about one engine architecture that we could use for durability purposes in TRUCKS and REFINE IT to have better MPG'S more power than say, GM? Nope... just more crap! Go ahead bro! go buy you a 3.3L N/A for your TRUCK!

I do see your point. Ford does appear to change engine designs and architecture like the weather.

 

GM has had maybe 4-6 basic gas engine configurations in their trucks since the 60's; SBC architecture(SBC & LS series) BBC, I6 & Vortec V6 & maybe another one or two I've forgotten.

Ford has had l6, several V6's, numerous v8's of various designs, both OHC and pushrod etc. etc. It seems every 3-5 years there's whole new line of engines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll soon be removing the 5.0 from the F150 line. I believe it's going to be a 4.8L of some sort. All hear say as of now.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll soon be removing the 5.0 from the F150 line. I believe it's going to be a 4.8L of some sort. All hear say as of now.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Maybe they could try a 4.6 again

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they could try a 4.6 again

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Might as well. Ford just loves their smaller DOHC motors that hardly make any more power than GM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. I personally like ford. Almost bought one, but the ecoboost engine (they haul ass!!!) Doesn't last as long as our 5.3 and 6.2 engines. Plus an xlt costs as much as my ltz. Now, this new Ford body style for the f150 coming out in 2018 is ugly in my opinion.

 

sure, they haul ass right up to the point when you eat a Turbo at $800 a piece! (that is how much the turbo costs for my sister's 2013 Escape at the Local Ford Dealer!)

 

hell, you can get an LT Z71 for a Grand CHEAPER than the XLT model!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll soon be removing the 5.0 from the F150 line. I believe it's going to be a 4.8L of some sort. All hear say as of now.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

 

I heard that too about the 4.8. But they have updated the 5.0 for 2018. So guessing it will be several years before they swap it out for something else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I heard that too about the 4.8. But they have updated the 5.0 for 2018. So guessing it will be several years before they swap it out for something else.

The were even able to update 3.5L Ecoboost to pull more HP & Torque. I still love my 5.0 mustang.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 3.3 na has 80 something more hp than my 1990 sierra w 5.7 had. Theres nothing wrong with a v6 in a truck these days. Most people have trucks that are way overkill.

 

I was tempted by the ecoboost but concerns about long term reliability and looks pushed me towards a 5.3 sierra.

Same reason I bought my truck over the Ford. Those ecoboosts are damn fast though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ego boost doesn't seem all that quick when you drive a 6.2..besides they sound like a Hoover vacuum cleaner from outside. Inside of course you get to hear the illusion you have a V8.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The acceleration times of the 3.5L Ego boost and the 6.2L are pretty much side by side, with only a .2 or .3 second difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I have read yet it doesn't feel as quick..my cousin has a new one with the 2.7 that's supposed to be quicker to 60 then the 3.5 and to me it seemed in par with the 5.3's acceleration not the 6.2. My truck even with over a 100,000 miles on it pulled away from his off the line and continued until I let off.

His is full of features, some are worth having like the trans. buttons that change the shifting, etc. Way nicer interior then mine too but I wouldn't trade my old 2011 Chevy for his new Ford for anything. IMO I don't care what they do to a six cylinder...if it's a truck it should have a V8. Unless it's a economy, delivery, old man ride..

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might as well. Ford just loves their smaller DOHC motors that hardly make any more power than GM.

 

 

 

40 HP is pretty significant. And I'm pretty sure the 4.8 thing has been disproven.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

40 HP is pretty significant. And I'm pretty sure the 4.8 thing has been disproven.

True. Is that with the 5.0L?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Shawnslife
      Two easy ways to turn off the engine auto start system in the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 since they do not give you an off switch 
       
      here's the video link  let me know if you have any questions 
       
    • By Daver
      I've tried searching and can't seem to find any information about towing.
       
      I've had a couple of 2500's, a 3500 and my son now has a Canyon. When he got his, I went back to a 4 door sedan. It's been 3 years and I'm ready to be back in a truck. His 4 cylinder Canyon doesn't do it for me....
       
      I'm interested in a 2019 AT4 with the D-max. Will the tow specs be lower on the AT4 than on the straight Denali? Kind of like how the ZR2 is less than the Z71 Colorado. 
       
      Thanks, friends!
    • By Gorehamj

      John Goreham
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      4-27-2018
       
      Ford has announced that it will begin to phase out of the passenger car market. The most recent announcement caps a long list of hints by Ford that the company could not seem to build cars that are competitive or that were profitable to make domestically. Ford will be walking away from a volume of business larger than the total sales volume of Volkswagen in America. The Mustang will stay, but most of the Ford cars will not have a next generation.
       
      FCA recently canceled two Dodge and Chrysler models, deciding to keep only the luxury and rear/AWD muscle cars that it can also sell to government agencies. The natural question to ask, given that both Ford and Chrysler are walking away from mainstream family cars, is will GM follow the examples?
       
      Mary Barra, GM’s CEO says GM will not follow the example. At least in the near term. Here’s what Barra told investors in a recent conference call:
      “We launched very efficient architectures in the midsize and compact (segments) proving to be good platforms going forward with fairly minor changes…And the segments are still significant. Because we’ve made the investments, we need to deploy little to no capital going forward, so we view (cars) as an opportunity. What you’ll see us do is play very efficiently in a segment that, although it is declining, there is still an opportunity.”
       
      That does not mean that GM won’t retire individual car models across its brands. Barra has already said that the Volt will go away eventually as GM switches to battery-electric cars (fully electric like the Bolt). Cadillac, Buick and Chevy also have some cars that are moving so slowly the market is killing them off, regardless of what GM wants. All but one Cadillac car, ironically, the front wheel drive one, the Lacrosse, the Impala, and the Sonic all look like models that could eventually be replaced by crossover models.
    • By Sixfive
      I have a 95 gmc 2500 with a 6.5 it has a huge power loss and blows blue smoke only when under load also has visible smoke from oil fill tube. Seems to start and idle just fine no smoke until under load. Not sure what it is at this point it seemed to gradually get worse until today I could barely get up the hill. 
    • By truckofwinandawesome
      https://www.caranddriver.com/news/abandon-car-ford-dropping-all-passenger-car-models-except-mustang
       
      well, it looks like Ford is putting all of its eggs into one basket; by dropping every passenger car currently in production and going all in on Trucks and SUVs. essentially, the ONLY car they will have left is the Mustang and even then by 2020, the Mustang will be paired with a word that makes the performance community projectile vomit when it is uttered: HYBRID. i for one, feel sorry that Ford is about to essentially ruin the last good nameplate it has.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    197,143
    Total Topics
    2,087,476
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    165,310
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    dkj1216
    Newest Member
    dkj1216
    Joined
  • Who's Online   22 Members, 0 Anonymous, 488 Guests (See full list)

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.