Jump to content

  • Sign up for FREE! Become a GM-Trucks.com Member Today!

    In 20 seconds you can become part of the worlds largest and oldest community discussing General Motors, Chevrolet and GMC branded pickups, crossovers, and SUVs. From buying research to owner support, join 1.5 MILLION GM Truck Enthusiasts every month who use GM-Trucks.com as a daily part of their ownership experience. 

CEO Mary Barra Discusses GM's Short & Long Term Priorities - Here's What She Said About Trucks

Gorehamj

By Gorehamj,
in The Newsroom Archive

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gorehamj Senior Enthusiast

Gorehamj

Posted
Posted

 

barra gm image januaty 17.jpg

 

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
9-17-2018

 

Nothing. That's what Mary Barra has on her mind when it comes to pickup trucks and the future for GM. In her recent discussion with Fast Company, Mary Barra discussed, "...GM’s immediate priorities and the broader, bigger vision that it’s working toward." We read over the interview that Fast Company published and looked carefully for any discussion of trucks. Trucks are presently what pays GM's bills and pays its employees paychecks. Barra focused mainly on electrification of cars and ride-sharing. Presently, electric vehicles like the Bolt cost GM money. The company has a target date set for profitability on EVs in 2021.

 

Barra answered a direct question on what she sees as the future of transportation. She said, "Well, we see four major areas that are transforming the way people move today, and one is propulsion. That’s our focus on electrification. We’re putting significant investment there, not only in electric vehicles but fuel-cell electric vehicles. The next is autonomous, and clearly we’re putting significant investment there. The next is connectivity, and we think we’re just scratching the surface of how we can really create value for consumers from a connected point of view. And then the last is sharing, which we’re also making investments in with Maven." We really didn't expect her to say "Every vehicle after 2020 will come equipped with a snorkel." But how does a profitable truck company that dabbles in money-losing cars ignore its core competency?

 

Let's be sure we enjoy the diesel Bisons and V8 Camaros folks. They are not part of GM's future. It looks like if GM is still making trucks they will be electric, self-driven and connected to a geo-fenced boundary, and owned by a ride-sharing company you will subscribe to. 

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

mopac
mopac

While I do see value in On Star in the event of an accident or a theft, I don't see enough value for $25 a month.  Similarly, $15 a month for me to use my iPhone as a key fob.   Maybe once every 4-6 w

Nargg
Nargg

You are obviously not an average consumer of vehicles.  The items that have no use for you have a lot of use for most others.  In other words, the World does not revolve around you.

Imcrazy
Imcrazy

I will keep on driving, none of this self driving electric car bullshit.... F that... Give me a gas sucking 4x4 pickup truck till the day I die..

Posted Images

j-ten-ner Senior Enthusiast

j-ten-ner

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Gorehamj said:

...self-driven and connected to a geo-fenced boundary, and owned by a ride-sharing company you will subscribe to. 

I think that I could live with an electric powered truck. But this ^^^ scares the shit out of me.

Please stop writing such horror stories.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AvalancheZ71 Enthusiast

AvalancheZ71

Posted
Posted

I think it will be incorrect to characterize the "new" GM as a truck company for much longer. The profitable sales of trucks may make the shareholders happy in the short term, but it is only subsidizing the development of technologies for the future of transportation, which will probably look a lot different than it does now.

 

GM has already had its brush with death and is seeing that in the long term it will be better positioned to survive as a tech company that (perhaps) also builds cars and trucks, than as an auto manufacturer, which it has historically been. There may even be a day in the not-too-distant future where GM spins off its auto production business altogether. I would not be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mopac Enthusiast

mopac

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 9/17/2018 at 6:31 PM, Gorehamj said:

The next is connectivity, and we think we’re just scratching the surface of how we can really create value for consumers from a connected point of view.

While I do see value in On Star in the event of an accident or a theft, I don't see enough value for $25 a month.  Similarly, $15 a month for me to use my iPhone as a key fob.   Maybe once every 4-6 weeks I have a situation when that might be useful.   How about an in-app purchase per use for the rare occasions when it would truly come in handy?  The infrastructure is already there.  

 

If this is your "value" in connectivity Ms. Barra - KEEP IT.  The functionality is priced too high to be a value to me.  

Edited by mopac
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nargg Enthusiast

Nargg

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mopac said:

 

If this is your "value" in connectivity Ms. Barra - KEEP IT.

 

You are obviously not an average consumer of vehicles.  The items that have no use for you have a lot of use for most others.  In other words, the World does not revolve around you.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joey Roth Enthusiast

Joey Roth

Posted
Posted

Ms. Barra how did you ever get put in charge of GM, or let alone anything else? Gasoline powered cars and trucks will be here for another 30 to 40 years. Why? Because gasoline works, that's why. When your electric cars get 400 to 500 miles per charge, then you will have my attention. What happened to the hydrogen cars everyone was so "big" on a few years ago? I thought so. Driverless cars? Who are they for? There is no person in this world that will sit in the back seat of a driverless car and cruise the freeways of southern California. Period. Also, the technology is not there anyway. No computer can tell the difference and act accordingly to multiple changes in road conditions instantly. Don't believe me? Then you hop in the back seat and we can watch you go for a ride. Stop assuming people can't drive. I don't have accidents or get tickets, just like millions of other people. So it begs the question, "who are these future cars for"? Why pay for this technology just so I can sit in the driver's seat and read the newspaper? Stick with what you know, build us a mini-truck for the masses, listen to your customers, and tell the EPA to drop dead. So simple maybe I should apply to become President of GM. I'll even work for half your salary.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joey Roth Enthusiast

Joey Roth

Posted
Posted

Maybe she should have stayed in the attic? She keeps trying to put the cart before the horse. Have you ever met anyone that is just exhausted from driving to the point they need a self-driving car? No. GM is scrambling to met these impossible fuel requirements yet they won't build a small truck similar to the Chevy Luv or S-10 for which the public has been screaming about for years. Instead they give us full size trucks that are getting bigger every year. I thought my 2011 Silverado was a tank but it pales in comparison to the 2019 Silverado. It also makes my 2005 look like a child's backyard toy. They force nonsense on us like start/stop just to satisfy the EPA and raise the prices to the point where you need a second mortgage on your home just to buy one. Ms. Barra needs to come back to the world of today. If she thinks this is the "future" she is sadly mistaken.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
j-ten-ner Senior Enthusiast

j-ten-ner

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Joey Roth said:

... Stop assuming people can't drive...

Well, have you been to Canada lately?

Some users on here can't even merge onto a highway with less than 500hp under the hood.

Jokes aside, it's on us in which direction this is all going.

We as consumers have quite some power. It's called "money".

 

"Every time you spend money, you're casting a vote for the kind of world you want."

Anna Lappe

 

And then there is that other thing, called "democracy"...

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joey Roth Enthusiast

Joey Roth

Posted
Posted

Yes, exactly. That is why I won't purchase any 2019 Silverados' in the future. Neither will a great many other people for various reasons. The point I was trying to present was that Ms. Barra, as well as GM and the rest of the automakers, are out of touch with reality. By not buying a certain product one would think the maker would realize something is wrong and change directions. This is not the case with GM. The public wants a smaller affordable truck similar to the Chevy Luv, GM gives us the Colorado. They complain about meeting fuel economy requirements, so they make the Silverado even bigger. GM says it listens to customer needs, they raise the prices on cars and trucks and force ignorant concepts like the start/stop feature on us. What happened to the hydrogen cars that everyone was so thrilled about just a couple years ago? Why can't they build an electric car that gets 500 miles per charge? I drove the EV-1 back in 1991, it had flaws but they were moving in the right direction. You would think after all these years there would have been a significant improvement? I guess nobody noticed that Ms. Barra's home address happens to be Fantasyland.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

    • Gorehamj
      Will GM Follow Ford’s Lead and Exit Cars? Barra’s Answer
      By Gorehamj
      John Goreham
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      4-27-2018
       
      Ford has announced that it will begin to phase out of the passenger car market. The most recent announcement caps a long list of hints by Ford that the company could not seem to build cars that are competitive or that were profitable to make domestically. Ford will be walking away from a volume of business larger than the total sales volume of Volkswagen in America. The Mustang will stay, but most of the Ford cars will not have a next generation.
       
      FCA recently canceled two Dodge and Chrysler models, deciding to keep only the luxury and rear/AWD muscle cars that it can also sell to government agencies. The natural question to ask, given that both Ford and Chrysler are walking away from mainstream family cars, is will GM follow the examples?
       
      Mary Barra, GM’s CEO says GM will not follow the example. At least in the near term. Here’s what Barra told investors in a recent conference call:
      “We launched very efficient architectures in the midsize and compact (segments) proving to be good platforms going forward with fairly minor changes…And the segments are still significant. Because we’ve made the investments, we need to deploy little to no capital going forward, so we view (cars) as an opportunity. What you’ll see us do is play very efficiently in a segment that, although it is declining, there is still an opportunity.”
       
      That does not mean that GM won’t retire individual car models across its brands. Barra has already said that the Volt will go away eventually as GM switches to battery-electric cars (fully electric like the Bolt). Cadillac, Buick and Chevy also have some cars that are moving so slowly the market is killing them off, regardless of what GM wants. All but one Cadillac car, ironically, the front wheel drive one, the Lacrosse, the Impala, and the Sonic all look like models that could eventually be replaced by crossover models.
    • Gorehamj
      Would Import Tariffs On Steel & Aluminum Make Chevy Silverados More Expensive? GM's CEO Says "No"
      By Gorehamj
      John Goreham
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      3-8-2018
      Earlier this week GM-Trucks.com reported that the bean counters at Goldman Sachs had estimated import tariffs on steel and aluminum could cost GM $1billion in profits. Maybe they were wrong? In an interview this week, GM's CEO Marry Barra was asked specifically about the top-selling General Motors vehicle, the Silverado. The host asked, "Have you done any studies? Would it jump the price of a GM Silverado by $100? Is there a way to gauge?" Ms. Barra's answer was interesting. She said, "It's a small impact. We would look to find offsets and efficiencies in other places to not have to pass that on to the customer." Although that was good news for Silverado buyers, what Barra said earlier in the interview was a bit of a surprise, given the media's coverage of the tariff issue. When asked if she thought there would be tariffs on imported steel and what it would mean for the price of a General Motors car, Barra said, "We source about 90% of our steel and the majority of our aluminum from the United States. So when I look at the specific impact from that perspective I think it something we can more than offset. " 
       
      Barra did go on to say that if there is a change that drives the cost up it will have a direct effect on demand.  For part one of our coverage regarding why GM and other automakers are staying silent on tariffs, please check out our prior story.
       
       
       
    • Gorehamj
      GM's Mary Barra Stays In the Conversation With Pres. Trump
      By Gorehamj
      John Goreham
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      2-7-2017
      This week Uber's CEO dropped out of the President's Strategy and Policy Forum bending to protesters who rallied outside Uber's San Fransisco HQ. Elon Musk of Tesla, Inc. Mary Barra of General Motors, and 18 other business leaders have opted to stay in the conversation and help set U.S. economic policy. The first meeting was this past Friday. Following the meeting, GM issues a short statement from Mary Barra, saying, "I’m pleased to have been part of a very constructive discussion on how we can all work together on policies that support a strong and competitive U.S. economy, create jobs and address safety and environmental issues. As we have stated, a vibrant U.S. economy that is competitive globally and that grows jobs is what we all want."
       
       



    • Gorehamj
      Mary Barra of GM Given Seat of Honor at Trump Breakfast
      By Gorehamj
      John Goreham
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      1-24-2017
      At this morning's Presidential Breakfast at the White House, President Trump greeted GM's Mary Barra warmly and received from her a firm handshake. Trump offered her the seat to his right at the table. Other executives included Sergio Marchionne of FCA US and Mark Fields of Ford. The main topic for discussion was strengthening automotive jobs located in the United States.
       
      The full video of the meeting is posted below. GM issued this official statement following the meeting:
      We had a very constructive and wide-ranging discussion about how we can work together on policies that support a strong and competitive economy and auto industry, one that supports the environment and safety. The U.S. is our home market and we are eager to come together to reinvigorate U.S. manufacturing. We all want a vibrant U.S. manufacturing base that is competitive globally and that grows jobs. It's good for our employees, our dealers, our suppliers and our customers.
       
       



    • Gorehamj
      Truck Sales Have GM and Its Managers Rolling In Dough
      By Gorehamj
      John Goreham
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      4/25/2016
      Late last week General Motors fiscal quarter-end numbers were released, and the General is raking in the profits from expensive, high-end trucks. Even though unit sales have started to level off or decline in the U.S. and China, GM's two strongest markets for sales, the company doubled its profits compared to the same quarter last year. GM's $1.95 million in profits for the quarter set a company record. This according to the Wall St. Journal. The climb in profits is credited to selling a higher percentage of pricey trucks and full-size SUVs.
       
      Individual managers at the company are also doing well. Mary Barra, the CEO of GM, is now compensated at a rate of about $28.6 million per year according to the Detroit Free Press. Although the rank and file union members that build GM's vehicles ( for the most part) have also benefitted from profit sharing bonuses, Barra now earns about the equivalent of 356 union members (making, say $80K per year). As a point of comparison, Akio Toyoda, the CEO of Toyota (global) takes home the equivalent of roughly two to three million U.S. dollars per year according to multiple sources, and has for some time. Are you surprised that GM's top executive makes ten times what Toyota's does?



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    242.1k
    Total Topics
    1.4m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    309,536
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Irma Treble
    Newest Member
    Irma Treble
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept