Jump to content

ThomCannell

First Drive: Chevy's 2.7L Turbocharged Four Cylinder

Recommended Posts

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-100.jpg

Thom Cannell

Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com

November 23rd, 2018

 

What makes a Silverado a Silverado?


The thing is, regardless of our love of V-8 power and torque; V-6 engines are the heart of the truck market. Well, Chevrolet says they are.

 

Read Thom's 2.7L Deep Dive

 

A few days ago, in Scottsdale, Arizona, we put this proposition to the test, logging miles in a 2019 Silverado powered by the all-new 2.7-liter designed-for-trucks engine. And, as Doug Marcaida might exclaim, "This engine will run!"

 

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-113.jpg

 

Arriving on site, we were greeted by competing vehicles from Ford and Ram. The Ford was powered by its 3.3-liter V-6, the Ram by its 3.6-liter V-6. Before setting foot in a Silverado we took those competitors for a spin to see what Chevrolet—and GMC—are up against.

 

 

As you know, Chevrolet has six engines available for Silverado, the older 4.3-liter motor, two versions of the venerable 5.3-liter, one with simple cylinder deactivation, the other with full Dynamic Fuel Management, the 6.2-liter gas engine and a 3.0-liter Duramax diesel. The diesel and 6.2L are paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission with stop-start, and others use 8-speed automatics.

 

As Chevy’s business strategy encompasses High Value (Work, Custom, Custom Trail Boss), High Volume (LT, RST, LT Trail Boss) and High Feature (LTZ, High Country) segments, you can see where value customers—mostly fleets—will use the V-6. LE and RST customers will have a wide choice of engines, as will the luxury crowd. Some of that choice revolves around chrome-plated emotions. 

 

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-106.jpg

 

Back in January, at the launch of the new Silverado, Rich Scheer director, Exterior Design, Chevrolet Trucks said, "Chrome has become more polarizing, and more personal, than any other aspect of truck design. Some customers want no chrome at all and only body-color or blacked-out trim. Others feel a truck isn’t a truck without chrome bumper, but feel extra chrome can be too 'flashy.' Others want as much chrome as they can get." 

 

Our Red Hot RST with Jet Black seating fell into the no-chrome zone, the only bright work being on the bowtie, nameplate and bright alloy wheels. We didn’t feel the lack of chrome detracted from its handsome appearance.

 

The all-new 2.7-liter truck engine was specifically designed for Silverado and Sierra (and we're sure several other trucks, soon), and meant to deliver value, which is defined as durability, reliability, performance and fuel economy. The 2.7L is the standard engine for High Volume LT and RST where it delivers 310 horsepower, 348 SAE-certified torques, which is 22-percent more than the 4.3L V-6. There’s no skimping on comparable power. 

 

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-104.jpg

 

We think one of the selling points to customers (and management) is the new engine’s EPA rated fuel economy of 20 mpg in the city, 23 on-highway and 20 mpg combined. Notice the high rating for city, where many lifestyle trucks reside. The other thing that’s easily overlooked is the essentially flat torque curve from off-idle 1,500 to 4,000. Equally neglected is that torque doesn’t drop off at 4,000, instead knocking out about 300 lb.-ft. at 5,000 rpm. In other words, it is a solid powerhouse right to the redline.

 

Some facts we didn’t stuff into our engine story are the Direct Injection and the 10:1 compression ratio that enables. We did touch on the integrated exhaust manifold and how it has a separate in-head cooling system, and that using predictive algorithms the electric water pump can push cool water into the head as soon as you mash the throttle. We also skipped over the charge-air cooler, intercooler to some, with a very low restriction rate and ability to lower intake air temperature by 130°F. 

 

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-105.jpg

 

Our notes from driving the competitive vehicles reminded us that the Ford 3.3L in a XLT trim is pleasant, fairly quiet, competent, and under vigorous acceleration feels somewhat leisurely. It gets the job done—with no load. We were surprised by steering pushback from smooth-road imperfections. The Ram Big Horn had a huge display and more modern IP/IC resembling an expensive watch face. Ram has always biased its gear set for impressive launch off the line, so felt more powerful than Ford. We did note tinny controls on steering wheel. Overall, Ram Big Horn was more pleasing, though acceleration produced greater drama than Ford. We didn’t drive the current 4.3L due to time constraints, so can’t offer a head-to-head comparison. 

 

What owners will expect of this powertrain—and please think, "what happens when I step on the long black pedal"—is power, durability, power, reliability, power, and of course, power. 

 

In Phoenix downtown traffic, hitting almost every stoplight, the new 2.7L and its 8-speed moved ahead briskly, easily keeping up with traffic with only mid-throttle application. The engine just works. It's happy and strong, and on two-lane highways where passing is important it spools up quickly and does its job. You do get some engine noise of course, but with far less drama than other base engines. 

 

Outside Phoenix, on the back roads where we could do Wide Open Throttle runs, the 2.7-liter revved somewhat higher than a larger engine might, and with a different kind of engine sound that wasn’t intrusive or thrashing. If we were idling at 1,500 rpm and then accelerating briskly, we got a somewhat noticeable lag that's similar to any engine's transmission kick-down lag-time. However, if we had any pre-existing power, for instance when climbing steep grades or prepping for passing, then there was no lag between throttle and acceleration. Overall, it feels like a pleasant base engine and we are certain we'll see it in other vehicles. 

 

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-103.jpg

 

Official EPA for our RST was 21 Overall, 20 City, and 23 Highway with an axle ratio of 3.42. That is a standard towing ratio, not a high fuel mileage ratio attempting to bias the fuel economy figures. We’ve seen that, haven’t we? There’s no cheating, no fudging, so those EPA mileage figures are in the ballpark. Again, it's a real truck, a real truck engine.

 

If you’re wondering about cost, our RST with 43% Made In USA parts, listed at $50,625 including $1,495 destination. We had $7,630 worth of options like Bose audio, HD rear vision camera, aluminum wheels, 10-way adjustable seats, the Safety Package of backup and forward assist, trailer hitch, etc., all the cool stuff you'll likely add to your truck. 

 

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-107.jpg

 

Our final thoughts, the all-new 2.7-liter should not be compared with a 6.2L V-8 that transforms a Silverado into a Corvette with a bed. However, it is an engine that will knock your socks off when thinking of the technology that makes a relatively small turbocharged engine effectively and reliably move a truck. 
 

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-102.jpg

2019-Chevrolet-Silverado-Turbo-108.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ThomCannell said:

we are certain we'll see it in other vehicles.

^^^ That's a bold statement.  I'll be watching with interest. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like all products brought to market it will satisfy some of the crowd.

 

I'll stick with the V8.

 

:)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What strikes me is how that turbo 4-banger fills up the engine compartment, must because of the turbo plumbing, intercooler, etc. I'll bet you that engine will be a nightmare to work on (read more billable labor hours for the dealership). My old 05 K1500 with a 5.3 has wayyy more room under the hood.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, garagerog said:

What strikes me is how that turbo 4-banger fills up the engine compartment, must because of the turbo plumbing, intercooler, etc. I'll bet you that engine will be a nightmare to work on (read more billable labor hours for the dealership). My old 05 K1500 with a 5.3 has wayyy more room under the hood.

The other night, I was watching some Motor Week Retro Reviews on YouTube from the late 80s and early 90s.  One of the categories they compared was access to key components for ease of maintenance for the backyard mechanic.  You don't see much mention of that in modern reviews.  Everything is a sea of plastic which obscures everything but the oil fill, and washer fluid fill.  You can't even change a blinker bulb without undoing over a dozen fasteners to get some plastic out of the way.  Sigh.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the Ford test drive: "We were surprised by steering pushback from smooth-road imperfections."

Isnt that putting it mildly? That's been the case with Fords for years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they shortened the nose on the 2019 trucks? Wonder why they didn't try the 4.3l engine?  They had to know that would just make people question its continued use in a truck.  Saying they ran out of time is a bit of "convenience" excuse.  They had 12 hours if they wanted only daylight tests, leads me to think the 4.3l fell short. 

 

The video is a waste of time to watch, no exhibition of fast acceleration, just plain advertising shots with no sounds from the truck at all. 

 

Not a fan of the big chrome letters on the top of the fender.  Silverado is too long a name for that location in that font size. 

 

The idea that a slow response of the downshift at low speeds is somehow now considered normal is hard to understand or believe.  Electronics should be able to make decisions faster than the hydraulics work, so just say it's the torque management trying to save the warranty claims on the driveline that cannot handle the hard driving, instead of playing it off as being the norm. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, rkj__ said:

^^^ That's a bold statement.  I'll be watching with interest. 

It's going to find it's way into the Camaro to replace the current 2.0T

Edited by qwank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, qwank said:

It's going to find it's way into the Camaro to replace the current 2.0T

They were pretty clear about this being "a truck motor from the beginning."  They would have to do some serious back pedaling on that statement to drop it in a Camaro. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That truck looks just like a Tundra.  I'm glad I got an 18.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2018 Colorado with  2.8 Duramax 4 cylinder seems to have way more room under the hood than this full size truck with a smaller 4 cyl engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

355 hp and 383 lb.-ft. of torque on my 5.3L V8 from 2014 vs 310 hp and 355 lb-ft on this turbo L4. 

 

I tow a travel trailer with 50 sq.ft. frontal area. Power does make a difference when towing at highway speeds, which for me is 60 mph. Will the loss of 25 hp make a difference?

 

I use a commuter car for my daily driver, so the stop and go fuel economy specs don't matter to  me. However, I applaud GM for making a truck that has the same city mpg as my 3000 lb Celebrity from 30 years ago. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, garagerog said:

What strikes me is how that turbo 4-banger fills up the engine compartment, must because of the turbo plumbing, intercooler, etc. I'll bet you that engine will be a nightmare to work on (read more billable labor hours for the dealership). My old 05 K1500 with a 5.3 has wayyy more room under the hood.

Actually, take a closer look.  I noticed right away that GM used that nice air induction system to cover the massive hole created by the smaller engine.  There's quite a large space under the air intake at the front of the engine compartment.  Quite clever in many aspects.  Make a great air intake, and use it to make the engine compartment look better.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Doug_Scott said:

Not a fan of the big chrome letters on the top of the fender.  Silverado is too long a name for that location in that font size. 

 

They do that for a "throwback" style for the new trucks.  Many of the paints used now are very similar to 40 and 50 years ago paint.  Not appealing at all.  I'm waiting for the first major style update in 2021.  That is if GM follows their norm and redoing style  the 3rd year after release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Nargg said:

Actually, take a closer look.  I noticed right away that GM used that nice air induction system to cover the massive hole created by the smaller engine.  There's quite a large space under the air intake at the front of the engine compartment.  Quite clever in many aspects.  Make a great air intake, and use it to make the engine compartment look better.

I was talking about the cowl to radiator support area, not fender to fender. The use of all that useless plastic looks like a GM camouflage attempt to hide the fact that there is not really a real truck engine hiding underneath. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By Hdchevyclassic
      Need some opinions on what the heck is going on with my 2007 silverado classic. It has a 4.8 litre vortec with an afe cold air intake, edge cts2 programmer, gibson shorty headers, and a 3 inch catback exhuast. I have the code p0430 coming up but cant figure out what it is. Ive done a back pressure test on the cats, and did knock sensors and all O2 sensors a year ago. It doesnt feel like it has a misfire and im very mechanically inclined and everything in this truck is looked after. When i bought it there was a 4wd code and it wouldnt engage so i swapped out the button cluster in the cab and now it works fine. Other than that the truck has been perfect but id like to figure out what the heck is setting off the code. I have no exhuast leaks and the cats checked out perfect, anyone know what else it could be? Im looking for anything at this point, i hate check engine lights and have cleared it with the programmer but it comes back very shortly after being cleared. Thanks
    • By Nikko
      About to install a 2" motofab under strut leveling kit on monday, but am very concerned with torque specs. I can't find the exact torque specs for everything I need, and I don't even know how important it is for everything to be torqued exactly to specs. It's a 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ, 4x4. 
       
      How important is it to be precise when torqueing? Does anyone know where to find all the exact torque specs for my make and model? Has anyone ever done one before, and can you provide insight?
       
      Thanks.
    • By CertainDriver
      Hello everyone,
       
      I recently bought this clean title, high mileage 2000 Silverado LS Z71 from my coworker. It was right before Christmas and I really wanted to help the guy out knowing full well I could do something with it. Heck, I needed a truck after all. I get home and attempt to drain the oil but nothing comes out. After some poking around with a screwdriver, I get it to drain. Chunks are flowing along with the oil and it turns out there was so much sludge build up in the bottom of the pan, it sucked some up, suffered a momentary loss of oil pressure and spun the bearing. I know the transmission had a hard shift from first to second. Could it be low fluid? Maybe, but why do the swap just to find out the transmission is bad?
      My coworker friend was a smoker and it appears he preferred his coffee without a lid so the interior is....interesting. Also truck only has oxidation on the hood and fenders so the only reasonable choice was to find a salvaged donor vehicle to source parts from!!
      I have a buddy with a dealers license and I'm debating picking up this rear ended 2006 Escalade for a FULL front end/interior/dash/drivetrain swap. Can it be done? Plug and play? Anything someone doing something like this should know?
      I've done some pretty crazy engine swaps and garage rebuilds, 2 stroke porting early on, etc. 

      I have the ability but hopefully you folks can chime in and confirm whether or not it is possible or if there is a better option. I was also looking at a 2004 Duramax/6speed which was t-boned pretty good as a potential candidate but there's something about that plush Escalade interior....

       
    • By Silverado1227
      Get a Service Steering Column Lock screen pulling up on new 2019 LTZ Crew cab with a 5.3. Only have 1100 miles on it. Anyone else had this problem and if so what was the fix? 
    • By DougFL
      The end of December, I noticed a small amount of oil on the garage floor under the front of rear differential of my 2WD, 2019 High Country.   It appeared to be a pinion seal leak.  The Dealership concurred and ordered a new front yoke and pinion seal.  Today, the Dealership called and informed me that GM did not have the parts so they sent a Complete new rear Differential as a replacement!!  Now they need my truck for a Full day to swap rear ends.   Appears to be an EXPENSIVE way to replace a $10 part, but GM must know Best!?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    202,399
    Total Topics
    2,155,652
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    171,368
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Top Hospitals in Abu Dhabi
    Newest Member
    Top Hospitals in Abu Dhabi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   82 Members, 0 Anonymous, 531 Guests (See full list)

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.