Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Once again.

You will never convince me a new vehicle of any kind is worth the cost no matter what the new ones offer.

I saved $20 k on my 2012 used, hard to beat that IMO. That $20 k doesn't include insurance savings or plates.

I got lucky on the purchase of this truck, they wanted it gone for arriving new stock. 

 

Being retired now it's even better due to lower yearly mileage = lower wear and tear = lower cost.

 

I posted this before, I don't remember where on here but 1 person agreed with me because he did the same thing.

I figure I have saved over a $100 k on vehicles in my life by not buying new and driving them for a long time.

I do all my own work so that helps.

 

 2007 Accord bought 4 years old for $15 k, new over $ 30 k.

Getting ready to do a timing belt, water pump, pulleys on it this summer.

Estimated savings $1200-1300 or more.

 

It was simple to me, drive a new vehicle which is the worst investment there is IMO.

Or buy used vehicles and take the money saved and pay off houses , good investment.

Put it in investments,  anything but a vehicle.

Now if your wallet is fatter than mine or a new vehicle is more important I get that.

 

I have paid off 4 houses. 

 

:)

   

 

Edited by diyer2
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid $2,200 for my '86 Grand Marquis ... 16 years ago. :)  Paid $800 for my '93 940 4 years ago.

 

The '07 Silverado cost $30 LARGE when new ... plus all the failures I had to repair - struts, ball joints,  hub bearings, 4x4 switch ... and now a failing engine with 95k on the clock. Dumbest decision I've ever made, besides buying a '00 GMC Jimmy in 2008.

 

Here's the Jimmy today:

 

5b5fe8463c1c3_Jimmycutupnodoors(2).thumb.JPG.72b75a786bc767f2f8fbc61ebf360240.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

I think the guy your trying to recall was named 'Bob Jennings'

Think I still have some of his work hidden away somewhere. 

I remember a Gordon Jennings, but not a Bob. Gordon was the creator of Cycle World, I believe, and also an avid racer.

 

I had to do a Google search - it was Kevin Cameron I was thinking of. Used to love reading his articles. I haven't had a subscription to them in almost 15 years now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jsdirt said:

I remember a Gordon Jennings, but not a Bob. Gordon was the creator of Cycle World, I believe, and also an avid racer.

 

I had to do a Google search - it was Kevin Cameron I was thinking of. Used to love reading his articles. I haven't had a subscription to them in almost 15 years now.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, my bad. Yes Gordon. Bob Jennings was my middle school principal. Yikes!! Talk about a brain fart. :lol: 

 

Anyway I remember Cameron's writing. Yep, out there. I like Gordon. Man knew what he was talking about. Wrote a great post on reading plugs that became my gold standard.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, diyer2 said:

Once again.

You will never convince me a new vehicle of any kind is worth the cost no matter what the new ones offer.

I saved $20 k on my 2012 used, hard to beat that IMO. That $20 k doesn't include insurance savings or plates.

I got lucky on the purchase of this truck, they wanted it gone for arriving new stock. 

 

Being retired now it's even better due to lower yearly mileage = lower wear and tear = lower cost.

 

I posted this before, I don't remember where on here but 1 person agreed with me because he did the same thing.

I figure I have saved over a $100 k on vehicles in my life by not buying new and driving them for a long time.

I do all my own work so that helps.

 

 2007 Accord bought 4 years old for $15 k, new over $ 30 k.

Getting ready to do a timing belt, water pump, pulleys on it this summer.

Estimated savings $1200-1300 or more.

 

It was simple to me, drive a new vehicle which is the worst investment there is IMO.

Or buy used vehicles and take the money saved and pay off houses , good investment.

Put it in investments,  anything but a vehicle.

Now if your wallet is fatter than mine or a new vehicle is more important I get that.

 

I have paid off 4 houses. 

 

:)

   

 

Think that was me. :thumbs: Wrote a post on True Ownership cost. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have been gm truck guy my whole life. i have a 2004 and a 2011 5.3 trucks right now that have 150k+ and have never needed any repairs. i will never buy one of these. if they had just taken a 5.3 gotten rid of the afm and just added a turbo they would have had a perfect engine.

why is it that these companies insist on making this hi tech nightmare crap that will save you at most 1 mpg but cost you 10s of thousands in repair bills? false economy.

Edited by vhehn
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/28/2018 at 3:03 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

Think that was me. :thumbs: Wrote a post on True Ownership cost. 

i agree except if you run a business and can depreciate it. the government is very generous with depreciation nowdays. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, vhehn said:

i have been gm truck guy my whole life. i have a 2004 and a 2011 5.3 trucks right now that have 150k+ and have never needed any repairs. i will never buy one of these. if they had just taken a 5.3 gotten rid of the afm and just added a turbo they would have had a perfect engine.

why is it that these companies insist on making this hi tech nightmare crap that will save you at most 1 mpg but cost you 10s of thousands in repair bills? false economy.

EXACTLY my thoughts - couldn't have said it better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 27 year old truck, 18 year old Acura, 13 year old Elantra, 8 year old Genesis, one year old Camry. The Elantra is going to my grandson. The Camry was a leftover and a last before a new makeover, cost me 17K new, 12K discount. The Genesis is still under warranty, just maintenance cost. It’s possible to get your moneys worth buying new.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

I have a 27 year old truck, 18 year old Acura, 13 year old Elantra, 8 year old Genesis, one year old Camry. The Elantra is going to my grandson. The Camry was a leftover and a last before a new makeover, cost me 17K new, 12K discount. The Genesis is still under warranty, just maintenance cost. It’s possible to get your moneys worth buying new.


Sent from my iPhone using CRAPatalk

True. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I have a 27 year old truck, 18 year old Acura, 13 year old Elantra, 8 year old Genesis, one year old Camry. The Elantra is going to my grandson. The Camry was a leftover and a last before a new makeover, cost me 17K new, 12K discount. The Genesis is still under warranty, just maintenance cost. It’s possible to get your moneys worth buying new.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The reason that there’s ever more complexity, doo dads if you will, is because we the customer demand them.  My first new truck was 1975 Chevy 1/2 ton with an in-line 6, three on the tree, am radio, dealer added AC.  Thought I had died and gone to heaven because I finally had AC!  Now, I drive a fully loaded LTZ and am thinking about buying when the 2020 Denali when it comes out so I can have magnetic ride.  

 

About. Buying new vs used;  I think it’s situational which way to go.  The days of the shade tree mechanic are long gone for most DUI folks.  It requires a diagnostics center to troubleshoot most problems.  And, even then it has to be loaded with the right software by make/model/engine/etc.  And, most folks don’t have the time, knowledge, etc, to make the repair even if they could pull the correct codes.  So, bottom line, I buy new, and also buy extended warranty.  Btw, if anyone wants to make me an offer I’ll be glad to sell you my timing light, dwell meter, feeler guage, clutch alignment tool, brake adjustment tool, ridge reader, valve lapper, other stuff I haven’t used in about thirty or forty years. Heck, if you’ll pay shipping I just might give the stuff to ya 😂!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The reason that there’s ever more complexity, doo dads if you will, is because we the customer demand them.  My first new truck was 1975 Chevy 1/2 ton with an in-line 6, three on the tree, am radio, dealer added AC.  Thought I had died and gone to heaven because I finally had AC!  Now, I drive a fully loaded LTZ and am thinking about buying when the 2020 Denali when it comes out so I can have magnetic ride.  
 
About. Buying new vs used;  I think it’s situational which way to go.  The days of the shade tree mechanic are long gone for most DUI folks.  It requires a diagnostics center to troubleshoot most problems.  And, even then it has to be loaded with the right software by make/model/engine/etc.  And, most folks don’t have the time, knowledge, etc, to make the repair even if they could pull the correct codes.  So, bottom line, I buy new, and also buy extended warranty.  Btw, if anyone wants to make me an offer I’ll be glad to sell you my timing light, dwell meter, feeler guage, clutch alignment tool, brake adjustment tool, ridge reader, valve lapper, other stuff I haven’t used in about thirty or forty years. Heck, if you’ll pay shipping I just might give the stuff to ya !

I went the other way, a basic Camry. So easy to deal with. I don’t use half the features on the Genesis. The sun roof has never been opened, I use the navigation and pandora one my phone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So he states about 5 years ago this engine came to light to make it efficient and fun to drive. Well I guess it does get 1 mpg more . Fun factor ? compared to what I guess. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Jsdirt said:

EXACTLY my thoughts - couldn't have said it better.

Actually, ever increasing CAFE standards have been driving the never ending quest for mpg improvement.  Hence, AFM, 10 spd trannies, aluminum skin, even if it saves only a few hundred pounds.  A side note;  you’ve probably read that GM is discontinuing several small sedan lines.  Up until the recent Executive Order action taken by Trump to rescind the EPA CAFE regulations these low/no profit autos were needed to keep corporate mpg in line.  Now, they’re no longer needed.  So, they’re being cut.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Snoringbear said:

Actually, ever increasing CAFE standards have been driving the never ending quest for mpg improvement.  Hence, AFM, 10 spd trannies, aluminum skin, even if it saves only a few hundred pounds.  A side note;  you’ve probably read that GM is discontinuing several small sedan lines.  Up until the recent Executive Order action taken by Trump to rescind the EPA CAFE regulations these low/no profit autos were needed to keep corporate mpg in line.  Now, they’re no longer needed.  So, they’re being cut.  

I did know they were tied into corporate mpg ratings and credits. Did not know that changed and they no longer count. No wonder they are getting axed like diseased elm trees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By Silverado1227
      Get a Service Steering Column Lock screen pulling up on new 2019 LTZ Crew cab with a 5.3. Only have 1100 miles on it. Anyone else had this problem and if so what was the fix? 
    • By ThomCannell

      Thom Cannell
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      November 23rd, 2018
       
      What makes a Silverado a Silverado?

      The thing is, regardless of our love of V-8 power and torque; V-6 engines are the heart of the truck market. Well, Chevrolet says they are.
       
      Read Thom's 2.7L Deep Dive
       
      A few days ago, in Scottsdale, Arizona, we put this proposition to the test, logging miles in a 2019 Silverado powered by the all-new 2.7-liter designed-for-trucks engine. And, as Doug Marcaida might exclaim, "This engine will run!"
       

       
      Arriving on site, we were greeted by competing vehicles from Ford and Ram. The Ford was powered by its 3.3-liter V-6, the Ram by its 3.6-liter V-6. Before setting foot in a Silverado we took those competitors for a spin to see what Chevrolet—and GMC—are up against.
       
       
      As you know, Chevrolet has six engines available for Silverado, the older 4.3-liter motor, two versions of the venerable 5.3-liter, one with simple cylinder deactivation, the other with full Dynamic Fuel Management, the 6.2-liter gas engine and a 3.0-liter Duramax diesel. The diesel and 6.2L are paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission with stop-start, and others use 8-speed automatics.
       
      As Chevy’s business strategy encompasses High Value (Work, Custom, Custom Trail Boss), High Volume (LT, RST, LT Trail Boss) and High Feature (LTZ, High Country) segments, you can see where value customers—mostly fleets—will use the V-6. LE and RST customers will have a wide choice of engines, as will the luxury crowd. Some of that choice revolves around chrome-plated emotions. 
       

       
      Back in January, at the launch of the new Silverado, Rich Scheer director, Exterior Design, Chevrolet Trucks said, "Chrome has become more polarizing, and more personal, than any other aspect of truck design. Some customers want no chrome at all and only body-color or blacked-out trim. Others feel a truck isn’t a truck without chrome bumper, but feel extra chrome can be too 'flashy.' Others want as much chrome as they can get." 
       
      Our Red Hot RST with Jet Black seating fell into the no-chrome zone, the only bright work being on the bowtie, nameplate and bright alloy wheels. We didn’t feel the lack of chrome detracted from its handsome appearance.
       
      The all-new 2.7-liter truck engine was specifically designed for Silverado and Sierra (and we're sure several other trucks, soon), and meant to deliver value, which is defined as durability, reliability, performance and fuel economy. The 2.7L is the standard engine for High Volume LT and RST where it delivers 310 horsepower, 348 SAE-certified torques, which is 22-percent more than the 4.3L V-6. There’s no skimping on comparable power. 
       

       
      We think one of the selling points to customers (and management) is the new engine’s EPA rated fuel economy of 20 mpg in the city, 23 on-highway and 20 mpg combined. Notice the high rating for city, where many lifestyle trucks reside. The other thing that’s easily overlooked is the essentially flat torque curve from off-idle 1,500 to 4,000. Equally neglected is that torque doesn’t drop off at 4,000, instead knocking out about 300 lb.-ft. at 5,000 rpm. In other words, it is a solid powerhouse right to the redline.
       
      Some facts we didn’t stuff into our engine story are the Direct Injection and the 10:1 compression ratio that enables. We did touch on the integrated exhaust manifold and how it has a separate in-head cooling system, and that using predictive algorithms the electric water pump can push cool water into the head as soon as you mash the throttle. We also skipped over the charge-air cooler, intercooler to some, with a very low restriction rate and ability to lower intake air temperature by 130°F. 
       

       
      Our notes from driving the competitive vehicles reminded us that the Ford 3.3L in a XLT trim is pleasant, fairly quiet, competent, and under vigorous acceleration feels somewhat leisurely. It gets the job done—with no load. We were surprised by steering pushback from smooth-road imperfections. The Ram Big Horn had a huge display and more modern IP/IC resembling an expensive watch face. Ram has always biased its gear set for impressive launch off the line, so felt more powerful than Ford. We did note tinny controls on steering wheel. Overall, Ram Big Horn was more pleasing, though acceleration produced greater drama than Ford. We didn’t drive the current 4.3L due to time constraints, so can’t offer a head-to-head comparison. 
       
      What owners will expect of this powertrain—and please think, "what happens when I step on the long black pedal"—is power, durability, power, reliability, power, and of course, power. 
       
      In Phoenix downtown traffic, hitting almost every stoplight, the new 2.7L and its 8-speed moved ahead briskly, easily keeping up with traffic with only mid-throttle application. The engine just works. It's happy and strong, and on two-lane highways where passing is important it spools up quickly and does its job. You do get some engine noise of course, but with far less drama than other base engines. 
       
      Outside Phoenix, on the back roads where we could do Wide Open Throttle runs, the 2.7-liter revved somewhat higher than a larger engine might, and with a different kind of engine sound that wasn’t intrusive or thrashing. If we were idling at 1,500 rpm and then accelerating briskly, we got a somewhat noticeable lag that's similar to any engine's transmission kick-down lag-time. However, if we had any pre-existing power, for instance when climbing steep grades or prepping for passing, then there was no lag between throttle and acceleration. Overall, it feels like a pleasant base engine and we are certain we'll see it in other vehicles. 
       

       
      Official EPA for our RST was 21 Overall, 20 City, and 23 Highway with an axle ratio of 3.42. That is a standard towing ratio, not a high fuel mileage ratio attempting to bias the fuel economy figures. We’ve seen that, haven’t we? There’s no cheating, no fudging, so those EPA mileage figures are in the ballpark. Again, it's a real truck, a real truck engine.
       
      If you’re wondering about cost, our RST with 43% Made In USA parts, listed at $50,625 including $1,495 destination. We had $7,630 worth of options like Bose audio, HD rear vision camera, aluminum wheels, 10-way adjustable seats, the Safety Package of backup and forward assist, trailer hitch, etc., all the cool stuff you'll likely add to your truck. 
       

       
      Our final thoughts, the all-new 2.7-liter should not be compared with a 6.2L V-8 that transforms a Silverado into a Corvette with a bed. However, it is an engine that will knock your socks off when thinking of the technology that makes a relatively small turbocharged engine effectively and reliably move a truck. 
       


    • By Zane

      Come visit the Chevy booth! There's lots of room to walk around!
      Zane Merva
      Executive Editor / Publisher , GM-Trucks.com
      11/02/18
       
      The Answer
      We're killing Betteridge's law of headlines. Yes. 
       
      The Setup
      Arrive at SEMA and the first thing you see and hear is the sound of Ford Mustangs and F-150 Raptors in the front parking lot giving hot laps and jumps to convention goers. All in front of a HUGE crowd.  In the back parking lot, Kia was also offering hot, tire squealing rides in the new Stinger. Both events had long lines and awestruck crowds. From the outside, SEMA could have been seen as a Ford and Jeep Show. Ford product was everywhere. Wranglers were in every booth. 
       

      PPG's booth changes every single year and dazzles with detail and color
       
      The Competition
      Inside, Ford's display included dozens of cars, concepts, tricked out race Mustangs, and super lifted F-150s. Toyota had a lineup that attracted attention and whispers SEMA wide, a lineup of every generation Supra, including the new one. Mopar's booth (Chrysler, RAM, Dodge) was vibrant, alive, and interactive. And packed. 
       

      Rich, interesting, vibrant. The booth pulls you in. MOPAR always kills it. 
       
      The Home Team
      Then, there was Chevrolet. No interactive experiences, same booth from the last 10 years, no true concept vehicles, and the predictable COPO Camaro. Sure, there was a few 2019 Silverado and Colorado with Chevy Performance Accessories, but you'd be hard pressed to know that unless you looked at the detail card in front of each vehicle.  The redesigned Camaro was showcased next to the COPO Drag Camaro and eCOPO electric Drag Camaro. But everyone was confused. Was this the actual production look? Or would Chevy change the design again? The all new Blazer made an appearance but in pre-production trim only and looking way too good to come off an assembly line. 
       
      Chevrolet canceled it's 10+ year streak of Pre-SEMA kickoff parties this year, leaving media and enthusiasts in the dark about what the company was truly proud about. I personally attempted to get a rundown of the vehicles that would be on display weeks ahead of the show. My request was only replied to after three follow ups. Even then, the company representative only told me there wasn't a kickoff event and nothing about what the brand was showing off. Okay then. Before we even touched down in Vegas it was apparent Chevy didn't care too much about the show this year. 
       

      The crowd trying to photograph the line of Supra was intense
       
      The Show Vibe
      Aside from manufacturer's efforts to wow and dazzle SEMA-goers, the amount and types of vehicles on display in the independent booths also set the vibe for the show. In years past, Chevy killed it in this regard. During the launch of the 5th-gen Camaro, the new model was in almost every booth. Same with the 2014 Silverado. Independent accessory manufacturers wanted and needed to have those new models in their booth to attract customers. 
       

      This was the coolest thing in the entire Chevy booth. A 1978 "Silverado Concept"
       
      This year, despite the biggest truck launch of Chevrolet's existence, the 2019 Silverado was a rare beast to find in the halls of SEMA 2018. Only twenty 2019 T1XX pickups were to be found in the Truck/Off Road section. Now, compare that to hundreds of 2019 RAMs and Jeep Wranglers. (The 2019 Wrangler killed it this year and was EVERYWHERE). Large companies like Truck Hero and Lund had one or two 2019 Silverado but three or four 2019 RAM and maybe ten Wranglers. 
       

      Yay, we found one!
       
      What Should Have Happened
      Chevrolet missed a giant opportunity this year at SEMA 2018. At minimum, the brand should have:
      Taken Toyota's cue and had an "every generation" lineup of pickups.  The photo opportunities would have been amazing and the foot traffic would have been through the roof.  Never canceled the customary kick-off welcome event for enthusiasts. Just omitting that one opportunity to pump up the brand gave no room for excitement to take off before the show.  Expanded or embellished the booth. Chevy's footprint was underwhelming and pedestrian compared to even smaller industry players.  Continued to offer their Camaro/Corvette hot lap experience to get show goers excited. Pushed 2019 Silverados out to independent companies for display like candy is given to kids on Halloween.   

      "It's a wide non-descript wall of parts with super high prices" could have been Chevy's theme this year. 
       
      Did Chevy botch this year's SEMA Show? Yes, I think so. But.... Only the brand can tell you if they got what they were looking for. As an enthusiast, I left wanting more. Much, much more. 
       
    • By Zane

      Zane Merva
      Executive Editor, GM-Trucks.com
      10/30/18
       
      Day one of SEMA 2018 is almost already in the books and we've barely made it through the South Hall (which houses the Truck/Off-Road section) trying to get our eyes on every customized 2019 being shown inside exibitor's booths. There's no way we'll see everything but what we have seen already is impressive. Accessories for the all new Sierra and Silverado are coming out in force, even if the trucks are still trickling into dealerships. 
       
      Although the new fullsize pickups are GM's hot new thing, the automaker has not made it a focus of this year's show. That means, while we're seeing a ton of 2019 Silverado and Sierra, there are 2x as many 2019 Dodge Ram and 5x as many Jeep Wranglers. 
       
      Here's what we've seen so far. We'll add more photos to this thread as we take them. 








       














       




























       
       
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    202,399
    Total Topics
    2,155,654
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    171,368
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Top Hospitals in Abu Dhabi
    Newest Member
    Top Hospitals in Abu Dhabi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   85 Members, 0 Anonymous, 495 Guests (See full list)

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.