Jump to content

Gorehamj

2019 Ford Ranger's Combined MPG Matches Colorado/Canyon Duramax Numbers

Recommended Posts

ranger towing us spec 675.jpg

 

 

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
12-11-2018

Ford's media launch for the all-new 2019 Ranger is presently underway. One tidbit that Ford let out today is that the Ranger will have a 22 MPG Combined rating in 4X4 and 23 MPG combined in RWD versions. Those numbers are the same as the Colorado and Canyon Duramax diesels'.

 

Normally, comparing a gasoline-powered vehicle to a similar one with a diesel engine is meaningless. Diesels are really good at two things; creating torque at low RPMs and having a high miles per gallon rating (of diesel fuel). The Ranger is a bit different. Like the new Chevy 2.7-Liter turbo gas engine, the Ranger's 2.3-liter "EcoBoost" turbocharged gasoline engine also develops outstanding torque at low RPMs. The Ranger is rated at 310 lb-ft of torque. Ford has not yet provided a curve for it and we will update our readers when they do. Expect a low RPM peak and a flat plateau over the entire normal operating speed range of the engine.  

AAA fuel prices dec 18.png

Diesel is presently selling at 22% more per gallon than regular unleaded according to AAA's daily national average posting. It will be interesting to see how the Ranger pulls trailers. It may well have a similar pulling ability to the Duramax equipped midsize trucks from GM, but offer much quicker acceleration coupled with a lower cost for fuel.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Add that to a fairly long list of things that Ford did right on the Ranger. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John's got the oar out stirring the pot I see. :rolleyes: Must be bored.....again....:lol:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah but the real world won't match the 2.8 Duramax.  I'm 24mpg (winter) and 28-30mpg(spring/summer/fall) per tank average.  26mpg in the life of the truck at 26,600 miles. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, newdude said:

Ah but the real world won't match the 2.8 Duramax.  I'm 24mpg (winter) and 28-30mpg(spring/summer/fall) per tank average.  26mpg in the life of the truck at 26,600 miles. 

Just talked me out of the Colorado. :lol: 

 

Lifetime average all seasons for Pepper is 27.1 mpg over 83,000 miles. Fuel is cheaper too. Yes, you more than likely don't drive like I do, granted. I would love to see the LV3 motor offered with the six speed in a RC Colorado with the same tune as the WT 1500's. That's an upper 30's mpg combination with a killer power to weight. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Just talked me out of the Colorado. :lol: 

 

Lifetime average all seasons for Pepper is 27.1 mpg over 83,000 miles. Fuel is cheaper too. Yes, you more than likely don't drive like I do, granted. I would love to see the LV3 motor offered with the six speed in a RC Colorado with the same tune as the WT 1500's. That's an upper 30's mpg combination with a killer power to weight. 

 

27.1 is quite good.  What are your driving habits like to have done so well?  Most of the 4.3 trucks I've seen at work are much lower than that.   

 

I could get better, but as you state, driving habits vary, hence mileage will vary.  My winter numbers drop and hurt my average because I spend some bit of warm up time every day.  Summer counteracts it.  My trip to work is 32 miles round trip.  More than half of it is 55mph highway, but the other portion is 55mph with some lighted intersections.  Those can take a hit on the stop/go between the lights. 

 

I've done some good trip runs with this thing and driving well above the speed limit on those trips.  Rochester to Toronto and back, I averaged 30mpg that trip, however it was mostly at 70-80mph (NYS thruway, plus QEW which is a damn raceway), but in that trip, there was an hour and a half of bumper to bumper traffic, which killed what I could have really gotten.  My Watkins Glen run got me 33mpg on that trip, and there are some decent hills here and there.  Again, some traffic (race day) and speeds were 60-70mph.   

Edited by newdude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

55 mph. Easy throttle. Treat city like the plague. Cherry pick my situations. Like I don't go to town if the need is there in rush hour. Pick my route. Lots of secondary routes. WAZE works pretty good.  I'm retired so I don't have many 'have to" situations. IF the engine is on, the truck is moving. Work with nature instead of against it. If I have three days to do a thing I pick the one my weather app shows is the least windy. Travel at night sometimes after hours and in lighter winds. I've done some work on heat management. Truck is bit lower. Watch time pressures like a hawk. Intense maintenance. Lighter syn. fluids.  A zillion little things that I've learned to do second nature. I let others drive theirs and I dive mine. It's not my job to run 15 over the limit because some joker got up 20 minutes late for work. Pepper never gets run in the snow an salt so winter miles are disproportionate low to most others experience. I have a salt car for that. 

 

It's not a competition nor a race track. It is my hobby.   That all said I have enough experience with her to know I can run 70 mph and still be quite a bit over the national average. She will still get over 23 mph at 55 mph into a 20-30 mph headwind. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By S P
      I just traded our 2012 BMW X5 diesel (3.0L Inline-6 asymmetrical twin-turbo, 265hp, 425tq) for a 2018 Suburban. The turbodiesel performed brilliantly in that 5200 lb SUV, and you could easily get 26-28 mpg on road trips, and it did north of 20 mpg average in local driving. I've been saying for years that a lot of these mid to large-sized SUVs are just screaming for 6-cylinder class diesel engines, so it's nice to finally see them popping up. I'd love to see this engine be an option in the next gen Suburban/Tahoe and the Yukons. Who else?
    • By scubarob639
      2018 Silverado Z71 5.3L with 14K miles. DIC fuel average indicates 10.3% better fuel economy then actual MPG.  28 fill-ups and reset each time. Any way to calibrate meter?  1% variance maximum variance between each of 28 fill-ups.
      Thanks for any assistance. Truck is 100% stock including tires. 
    • By Ouis M. Mouffok
      Dears, 
      I bought my 2017 Chevy Colorado Duramax Z71 brand new and I just love it. I was super satisfied with the performance and features of the truck. Due to the nature of my job, I had to move outside the U.S for a long mission to Africa, so I took my truck with me. Here started my nightmare. Just few days of use, I had the famous warning message regarding the quality of gas (DEF). I changed several brands of DEF but no success! I read somewhere that the shelf life of the product is key for the quality of the fluid. Now my truck is kind of locked, I am allowed to drive 6 Miles/h, it means it is not working. The worse thing is that there is no GM, Chevrolet store to assist. I was thinking to delete the whole DEF system if possible since the location where I am based is not regulated by the gas emissions. I will be very grateful if you could assist as I am suffering without my car. Thanks for your help.
    • By Gorehamj

      John Goreham
      Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
      10-8-2018
       
      Ford released the specifications of its North American market new Ford Ranger over the weekend. The specifications are a clear indication of the benefits of a boosted gasoline engine. At least on paper. The Ranger will launch with just one engine. The 2.3-liter EcoBoost, four-cylinder with 310 lb-ft of torque. The engine is mated to a 10-speed automatic. 
       
      With its towing package, the Ranger will have a 7,500-lb maximum towing capacity. That exceeds the maximum 6,800 that the top-selling Toyota Tacomas equipped with towing packages can handle. Diesel Colorado pickups from GM can tow up to 7,700 pounds. Ford makes the claim that its truck has class-leading towing, with the qualifier that it applies to gasoline-powered trucks. 

      Ford also revealed that the maximum payload for the Ranger.  “Think of Ranger as the biggest and most capable backpack for your gear,” says Rick Bolt, Ford Ranger chief engineer. “With 1,860 pounds of maximum payload, Ranger can haul nearly a ton of gear to enable your next adventure.”
       
      Ford is presently taking pre-delivery orders for the Ranger, which enters production in the coming months. The new ranger for North America will be built at Ford’s Michigan Assembly Plant.
       
    • By Zane
       

      Zane Merva
      Executive Editor, GM-Trucks.com
      10/3/18
       
      Those wishing for some guidance on how the all new 3.0L Duramax Diesel will rate just had that wish come true. The Fast Lane Truck got the scoop from someone with access to General Motor's Canadian Dealer Portal. Promotional material that included specs for the new 3.0L were photographed and emailed to the website yesterday. That means someone with dealer access facilitated the leak.  
       
      The not quite yet official figures rate the light-duty diesel engine at 282 horsepower and 450 lb-ft of torque. The material also claims a highway rated fuel economy of 28 mpg. That's more power then both Ford and Ram's small diesels, which produce 250hp/440 lb-ft and 240hp/420 lb-ft respectively. 
       
      The same spec sheets also list the towing capacity of the 3.0L at 7,800 lbs, which falls below the 5.3L and 6.2L's 9,000lb+ rating. To us this signals that GM will market the 3.0L Diesel as a daily commuter for someone who occasionally tows. 

      What do you think about the ratings and capability? Chime in on this thread in our 2019 Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra forum.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    202,398
    Total Topics
    2,155,636
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    171,366
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Jay7171
    Newest Member
    Jay7171
    Joined
  • Who's Online   19 Members, 0 Anonymous, 320 Guests (See full list)

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.