I will argue that point wholely. 1) how does NA vs Turbo handle atmosphere? NA) by losing 3% every 1,000 ft Turbo) keeps same Max HP. Turbos spin faster in the less dense air keeping the intake pressure at the same level. This is the same concept used in turbo-prop/turbofans used in planes and helicopters. 2) how does NA vs Turbo handle changing engine loads NA) it can only create negative pressure in the manifold for lower demands. The displacement stays the same, AFM ignored (which is why GM uses it, but parasitic losses) Turbo) by using a smaller engine and a compressor, most the time the engine manifold pressure is positive. By increasing pressure, a smaller engine can actually move MORE air than an NA engine 2x it's size. More air + more fuel = more power So why all this talk of turbo now when the small block V8 has been king? Well simple... Computers. Better modeling, better programming, better engine computers, better understanding of the physics. Did you know that the first year of F1 moving to the newest set of turbos, tire manufacturers had problems? Yeah, coming out of the turns, the turbos spooled via an electric motor essentially acting as a procharger (on intake and exhaust mind you). The stresses were too much and teams had to dial down the new systems to avoid killing off their tires. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk