Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

42 Good

About Bryant_Olson

  • Rank
  • Birthday 01/01/1970

Recent Profile Visitors

1,025 profile views
  1. Yea I always wanted one but by the time I was gainfully employed enough to afford a pickup they were out of production and a little more wear and tear than I was looking for. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  2. Agreed, I wish they still made them. The mid-gate and lockable hard top was fantastic. I just think it probably cost more to churn them out compared to a CC, and they're pretty similar. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  3. Depends on the engine but probably not gonna happen in the GMC. GMCs seem to run a tad higher than Chevrolet. I got my RST with leather and the 2.7 for about $39k. Cloth drops it a bit more. Going from the 5.3 to the 2.7 saves a fair bit. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  4. @ullose272 That's a damn sharp truck though.
  5. I've had a soft cover for years and never had any issues. I figure people are less likely to break into something they can't see than something they can. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  6. I have leather in my RST btw, it's an option. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  7. I'm of the same opinion of[mention=132182]msaul37[/mention], I went from a 2017 LTZ to an rst. Lost a moon roof and cooled seats but the biggest things I use are still there. Heated steering wheel, seats, remote start, backup cam etc. Gained blind spot detection and push button start. Imo the RSTs have enough features that they pushed me out of an LTZ. I also love the 2.7 and the body colored bumpers. Way too much chrome for my tastes in the LTZ. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  8. I stand corrected Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  9. Pretty good watch, his EPA numbers on the 5.3 are a little skewed I think, I'm assuming the only version rated at 24mpg hwy is probably a single or double cab 2wd and I'm pretty sure you can't get a 2.7 in that low of a trim level. Really cool technology.
  10. Haven't needed one yet but I'll have the dealer do it anyway. 1 free one and I'm lazy [emoji23] Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  11. Gotta love how the guy doubles down on the troll. I bet he doesn't even have a double cab. Or friends, which explains the camping alone and never hauling people I guess. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  12. Yea the ecoboost needs quite a bit higher revving to hit its torque numbers. I honestly think the 2.7 is designed to run similar to the 3.0 duramax. It's really torquey and it's essentially ready at idle. As for the lag you really only notice it when you hammer on it but I never even think about it anymore. I've grown really fond of this motor actually. Hopefully you can get your hands on one sooner than later! Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  13. [emoji23] Too bad trade value is crap on it too, can't even get much towards a double cab.
  14. Thank you Jesus. Double Cab's are fine superhighsierra, if that's what you want. Don't tell me how to use my damn truck. I use it weekly to haul lumber, landscaping ******, etc. I also put friends in it from time to time and take trips where they're more comfortable in that. It behooves us to have the bed for storage on those trips and the ability to tow the boat. I'll buy whatever the hell I want and I'm super happy with it. Just because I don't sleep in the bed of my truck 4 days a week doesn't mean it's not getting used.
  15. Exactly. And I also think the CC looks loads better. The DC works better for one or two guys in this thread, that's awesome for them. It doesn't work better for most people. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.