Obviously get rid of cylinder deactivation.
IMO in 2024, These engines are dinosaurs, with okay reliability at this point.
Well, the 5.3L is tried & true, and definitely gets the job done, but is a little underwhelming.
And the 6.2L is just a "flex", not really sure why. Mediocre at best. Not worth the upcharge, or the dreaded fuel economy.
Duramax 3.0 is nice, boring but smooth.
Too many older heads claiming no V8, no man card. But have most likely not given anything else a chance.
Having driven the 3.5 Ecoboost (non-hybrid), this truck will definitely surprise you, i just hated the transmission tuning.
Now even though still in the beginning stages, that Tundra 3.4L (Non-hybrid), with that smooth 10 speed is definitely a blast, you would be very surprised.
Haven't been able to try that new ram hurricane yet. But everyone sleeping on anything with a 6 Cylinder with a turbo should go test drive one.
I don't think GM or any other manufacture cares about our opinions when it comes to engines (we can always dream though right?), EPA calls the shots so why not work with it?
GM should dump both V8's. Add a new engine with similar specs to rams new engine
Inline 6 (no cylinder deactivation)
10 Speed (3.55 Gears are fine)
420 HP/500TQ
18MPG City/ 22 HWY (GM trucks are light this should be very realistic)
5 Year/100K Mile warranty
I think that would make a lot of people happy