I can't seem to get to the actual article in Grumpy's link. I see the headline but the story is buried somewhere in a mishmash of MSN clickbait. I truly do not like MSN, all their "news" is regurgitated from other sources anyway.
I don't understand ripping Onstar or Uconnect out of vehicles, but I don't have to. People are free to do with their vehicles as they wish. I think it's silly, but, here we are.
I'd rather the automakers and their hired data firms be punished by law when they do things like OnStar may have done. OnStar apparently sold its data on driving behavior it collects which was supposedly de-personalized. It likely contained data about the vehicle itself, VIN, which insurers gobbled up via 3rd party. They matched the VINs in the data to VINs they insure and created risk advice for those policies based on risky/aggressive driving behaviors observed in the data. While they can't pinpoint WHO was driving the car during the risky behavior, doesn't matter, since they insure the VEHICLE, they felt it appropriate to charge additional premium to the policy holders.
Devil is in the details, you are typically passed privacy notices during sale or delivery, or simply USING the infotainment system or the vehicle communicates acceptance of Onstar's terms in some cases, including their various apps. I'm not sure how much of a leg consumers had to stand on in this fight, but the ugliness and bad PR, betrayed trust, caused them to stop selling that data--at least to that broker.
The sticky part, which I went through myself, was not knowing I was enrolled in their driving data collection program. It had a name which I forget, and you could toggle the program on or off via the onstar app. I was well aware of it, and was certain I had disabled it. I logged in one day to find it had been re-enabled either intentionally by GM or via code in a software update that defaulted the program to on. I called GM/OnStar at the time and logged a case with them for reasons of documentation and made them confirm the service had been turned off and would stay off. The program no longer exists, at least not under its old name and UI in the app.