Jump to content

Sterling Hess

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About Sterling Hess

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Name
  • Location
  • Drives
  1. I bought mine, because it was one of the few standard bed crew cabs around. I could not deal with a short bed. It sucks because the truck takes up almost all the garage, but being able to carry more, and easier is nice. From building materials, gravel, or even my side by side in the back. Plus with my topper I can sleep easily in it without having to go diagonal. If GM didn't release a 6.5" bed on the 2014+ I would of bought a ram haha. Dont have any pics of the RZR in the bed, but this is close lol
  2. My truck at 80 mph (love having 80mph speed limits) gets like 15-ish at best, mostly stock. With all that you are probably going to be single digits lol.
  3. Don't post often, but figure not many pictures of GMC with soft toppers, so who not
  4. Very interesting. If I were to buy a new GM truck I would lean towards the 5.3 still. Its what I have now and would be skeptical the lower HP/TQ numbers than my current 5.3 would satisfy me enough to go with it. I have yet to drive one, so its possible it would preform just as well as my current 5.3 but I don't know. I think a lot of people will focus on the peak numbers, and if it were me I would bump up the size a little to get the HP and TQ near the previous gen 5.3 engines. I like how it is meant to run on 87 octane but wonder if they will have the ability to detect higher octanes (or even E85) for a performance boost?
  5. I agree, the older trucks lack of safety features were better for offroading...I have 2 seat RZR I can put in the bed to offroad and beat up. It sucks when you break your daily driver haha.
  6. GM took the truck and repaired it so the manufacture knows everything. It had 800 miles on it. They fixed everything but basically said don't off road it like that. :/ But it was on a slight sideways slope, and was bumpy, Speed was maybe 10-15 mph? it was 3 years ago. A same year Ram and my older Avalanche with side bags had no issue with the same run. Imho the rollover sensor was too sensitive, but far as I know no changes have been made.
  7. Wonder if they will extend the re-calibration to the Sierra/Silverados as well? I had mine deploy off roading on my 2015 Sierra....
  8. April 2013, GM released MPG numbers of the 2014 Silverado. http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/chevrolet/vehicles/silverado/2014.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2013/Apr/0401-silverado.html 16 city, 19 comb. 23 highway (2wd) Then if you look at the current rating for the 2014, https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymodel/2014_Chevrolet_Silverado.shtml it is exactly the same, 16/19/23. So I dunno what you are talking about "low balling EPA numbers". Real world mpgs may differ, but the EPA rating is what was announced. We don't know if it is 2x4 or 4x4, but my guess it it is 2x4 and it hasn't improved from the 2014 generation.
  9. I had a similar experience in my new 2015 GMC sierra 1500, 800 miles on it, driving on a dirt road, I drove up on a side bank, not very steep, but at an angle (04 avalanche with side airbags had no issue on it, 08 silverado, etc) Curtain airbags deployed, onstar thought the vehicle was in a rollover, which it clearly wasn't. GM was hesitant to fix it, and said don't offroad it like that. Ironically, I was also looking at the Ram 1500 when I bought the truck, and for the 1.5 months my Sierra was in the Shop, GMs rental company gave me a RAM 1500, which took the same path and did not set off the airbags. Now as I'm looking a trading up to a 2019, the Ram is starting to look better to me as more and more info comes out about the 2019 Sierra...
  10. Its been a while since the last post, but has there been any updates to this, my 2015 Sierra is doing the exact same thing...slightly annoying.
  11. I agree that people are sue happy for sure, and for dumb-a reasons. Although GM lawyers could put in warnings about disabling the airbags, For example, to disable the airbags, you could have the DIC display a warning that you have to say yes before you can disable them (or change the threshold) and would have to anytime you disable the bags. Make it so they automatically come on when you start the truck regardless, and anytime it is in 2-HI, 4-auto or go over a certain speed (like 40MPH or something). It can be done, but wouldn't be simple as an on off switch. Also previous GM trucks had a passenger airbag disable, where you could use a key, and not aware of any lawsuit cases there...
  12. I really thing they should have this on the GM trucks too, either disable the rollover trigger (still could use side impact) or at least increase the threshold of which it triggers. (maybe only make it able to be deactivated/raise threshold in 4-HI or 4-LOW. Eddie, I sent you a PM. For those who are following this, I contacted the dealer, they finally got all the parts in and they expect to have my truck done Thursday or Friday, I will be happy to finally have my truck back. -Sterling
  13. Its hard to say exactly, since the going up the side of the hill, the passenger tires are still on the level road. If I had to make a guess it would of been around 30 or so degrees. I remember a bump on the driver side which I think was the actual tripping point of the air bags. If it was perfectly smooth may not of happened. I've heard of similar issues on other makes offroading too...realistically I should probably just rely on my RZR more for offroading than the truck, but I really like to wheel my trucks too, so the whole incident has been somewhat disappointing. But when I get my truck back (still don't have it back ) it does offer some improvements over my Avalanche; with the longer wheelbase, it probably will never be as good as the Avalanche for offroading, but it has better towing, mpg, cargo capacity and comfort so in ways it's a compromise. On a side note, still not crazy about the RAM, it does offer some features I like over my Sierra, such as a power locking tailgate, power rear window, and more hp. I dislike the interior as it feels/looks a lot cheaper, more noisy on the road, the infotainment is glitchy, the DIC is outdated, and the 8-speed transmission kinda sucks...kick down at freeway speeds takes a few seconds, so you have to plan ahead to pass anything. Rotary shifter sucks as well, always reaching for it while adjusting fan speed while driving (eyes on the road) and just feels cheesy, it works but lifting a lever into park just feels more secure. No rear locker, pulling a large trailer getting on the the highway from the shoulder was mostly a one-wheel-tire-fire adventure lol.Ride quality its hard to say since I I only drove the sierra for a week, but I'm thinking the Sierra is better. So as a whole, the 2015 Sierra SLE is better than the 2015 Ram Express imho and I don't regret my decision on the Sierra. -Sterling
  14. But the Tundra can twerk, can the K2 do that?
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.