The numbers in that Santa Clara study are biased. If you think I’m wrong, take a look at the sampling method they used to get those numbers. You also cherry picked the highest number from the article (85x). That’s the highest of the range, lowest of the range was 50x. Big difference there. We won’t truly know how accurate that is until they do more widespread tests like that with better sampling methods. It’s likely that the actual death rate will be much lower, but that doesn’t mean we should open back up immediately and put more strain on our healthcare (more on that at the bottom). I didn’t even read the news articles about it because they’re going to skew the interpretation of the results from what they actually are. Go read the actual white paper on the study. And yes, I have a masters degree in statistics It is worse than the flu. According to the CDC, 314 people have died from the flu in the US in the last week. Close to 10,000 from covid. All numbers from CDC, nothing from the news. And you think that’s not worse? However, karnut is right. The whole point of lockdown is to slow the spread and stop the overloading of our healthcare system, not to stop the virus. You cant stop the virus until you get a vaccine. That much is 100% location dependent. New York is extremely different from Southern California where I’m at. That’s why our president and the governors are working together to come up with a plan that will allow states to open up, once they meet a certain criteria, NOT once they meet a certain time frame Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk