17x9 with -12mm offset and 295/70's. I had to trim the mudflaps fo it didn't rub anymore.
its a trailboss with stock suspension. 2" lift over a standard z71 or 4x4
Won't happen. If GM builds a truck smaller than the Colorado it'll be like the new Ford Maverick, based off a fwd crossover with no chance in hell of a regular cab option.
You'd have better luck hoping they decide to put the 2.7 4cyl in a Colorado. But you still ain't gonna get a regular cab. Ford's the only manufacturer cool enough to make a regular cab short box now.
I don't think it looks bad, looks like a larger Tacomo and it's always been a good seller. Just hope they've managed to cut some weight and gain some fuel economy. Still not gonna buy one, but at least it doesn't look like a 1996 model anymore.
After going back and forth between 295/70r18s and 275/70r18s I finally pulled the trigger and went with 295/70's in a Cooper AT3 XLT, happy with the decision.
The GM CAI doesn't "require" calibration, but to optimize the CAI it includes a calibration for the MAF sensor. My guess is the aFe intake is the same. No different then any intake on other trucks. They all benefit from a tune.
The 6.2 doesn't have AFM (active fuel management) it has DFM (dynamic fuel management). Some have luck with the Range device, but Range doesn't guarantee it'll work. The other option is the Pulsar LT, which will do more than just deactivate DFM and auto start/stop.
I'm pretty sure my 2012 Silverado did that, even my 2009 Pontiac G5 might have. In fact I don't think I've had a vehicle newer then the G5 that hasn't done that.
My question is that if AFM/DFM is so great for fuel economy, why was it the first system to be dropped? Why not other systems, like LED lights, or wireless carplay, or park assist. Or maybe it's because AFM/DFM really doesn't do much and won't be missed much.