Jump to content

Give Me Head(s)


Recommended Posts

Posted

This thread is directed to Gear-Heads like me, who are constantly on the lookout for aftermarket products, and who are constantly trying to find ways to squeeze out those de-tuned Horses from our engines. I'm not here to bash anybody's product(s), but instead inform you of my experience with aftermarket item that I personally have purchased and installed on my vehicle.

 

About 2 weeks ago I installed a pair of headers for my 2003 GMC 8.1 liter (w/ Allison). I did a fair bit a research on the subject and ended up purchasing "The Other Guys Headers", (www.theotherguysproducts). I first read about them from (www.tbyrnemotorsports.com); Over the years I've installed approx. 7 or 8 headers for different vehicles I've owned; And I must say that these headers have the best finished, by far, that I have ever seen. The inlets are actually die-grinded for smooth exhaust entry. The installation was a snap (about 6 hrs), and the fit is absolutely perfect. Plenty of clearance all the way around.

 

However, "The Other Guys Products" web site is misleading in their performace description of these headers. There is no claimed-40 HP increase, that claim is pure B.S. Based on my experience, I don't believe there's 30 or even a 20 HP increase. Nothing noticable by the seat of your pants anyway. These headers are not true equal-length headers, if I had to compare them with anything, I'd compare them with shorty's.

 

Before I purchased the headers I asked Wayne at "The Other Guys Products" to provide me with Dyno-Charts substanciating their performace claims, he did not produce anything. I myself have not dyno'ed my vehicle to provide you with true Before and After results. But, come to think of it, I don't think I've ever been able to obtain dynamometer results from any header manufacturer, including Headman, Hooker. But I've built enough engines, and installed enough aftermarket performace products in my life to know that there is no significant increase in horse power.

 

HOWEVER, the headers look excellent, and I do beleive that these headers are currently the best available for the 8.1L.

 

During the installation of these headers I learned that the root of this engines breathing problem is GM's stock heads. The size of the stock exhaust ports on the factory heads are a disgrace; or more appropriately, they are a joke.

 

If you own an 8.1 L and are looking to increase the horse power, I would highly recommend waiting until someone out there produces a good aftermarket Head. Don't waste your money on headers or anything else claiming to improve the breathing of this engine. I truely do not beleive there is any product out there that can do this engine justice until Better Heads become available. Sure you can dump a few grand on a SuperCharger, or even more on a Turbo, but you'll still have an engine with a beathing disorder.

 

I just can't beleive that GM's 496 cubic inches (even though it's stock) can only put out 340HP at the crankshaft. That's only 0.68HP per cubic inch. What a joke. What a shame. And to make matters worst, from what I've read, the Allison tranny sucks out approx. 100HP leaving you with only 240 at the rear wheels. The only great thing I've come to learn about my truck's drive train is the gearing.

 

I have some very good digital photo's of the ehaust manifold (Stock vs Header), and of the exhaust ports on the stock GM heads. If your interested, I'll be happy to email them to you. They will show you what I'm talking about.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Gilbert,

 

I'd love to get an email of the pictures if you still have them. Also, a cam might be your interim solution until heads come out. I've heard the marine versions of the 8.1L that make big power use the exact same heads, but have bigger cam specs.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Dear Heads,

 

I just bought a 2003 2500 HD with the 8.1 and Allison. I think the whole setup sucks. I too figured the engine only puts out 0.685 HP and 0.917 pounds feet of torque per CI. What a joke!

 

I wish I had gotten a 6.0 and spent the extra money I spent on the darn big block and the Allison to hop up the 6.0.

 

It really frosts me when I pulled out some old issues of Hot Rod and Chevy High Performance and read where the GM HT 383 crate engine makes 325 HP & 415 lb. ft. of torque stock. With 1.6 roller rockers and headers they were pulling 355 HP and 452 lb. ft. of torque.

 

I had one dealing with big blocks back in the 70's. I sold that hunk of junk after I spent a lot of money hopping it up and build a 350 with a mild cam that ran better than the big block. I swore I would never have another one. I got this 8.1 to pull a 5th wheel. Now I wish I had bought a used older truck and rebuilt the engine. I would be much happer than this truck that is about as efficient as a snail.

 

Sorry owner

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I'll digg'em up and send your way wired. Sorry for the delayed response, I had not visited this area of the forum in a while. Sit tight, the photo's will come your way.

 

On another note, in one of the other areas on this forum, Tybrne posted some photo's of them, the difference between mine and his is this...I placed a measuring tape across the exhaust ports on the head to show their rediculously small size. I also placed my stock manifold next to the TOG's I installed to show the differences between the 2.

 

Anyway, sit tight and I'll email you couple of photo's.

 

Regards,

 

Gilbert

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 376 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...