Jump to content

First new non GM product


Friz

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had to do something about the money that I'm spending on gas. Just going back and forth to work, I spend between $200-$250 in gas per month. GM doesn't have a small car with any STYLE. I was forced to go Mopar and get a Cruiser. It's a neat little ride, suprisingly big inside for my 6-2 frame.

I'm sorry GM, but you have some catching up to do.

I'll give reports on the Cruiser as it goes. So far I have driven it a total of 5 miles - from the dealer to my house.

Posted

Congrats on the new vehicle.

 

I've never warmed up to the looks of the PT Cruiser, but some people like it.

 

So, instead of spending $250 on gas each month, you're now going to spend $175 on gas and tack on a $450 car payment. :cheers:

Posted

Nope - $300 payment and probably $50 on gas.

Meanwhile my gashog brute of a truck is paid for and sits in the yard until I need it. Less money on maintenance, tires, etc.

Posted

You don't have to justify your PT to me...I bought my truck for $11,500 to replace my $800 car that got 24mpg and burned a little oil.

Posted
Nope - $300 payment and probably $50 on gas.

Meanwhile my gashog brute of a truck is paid for and sits in the yard until I need it. Less money on maintenance, tires, etc.

 

 

 

 

Not, calling down your decision but if the PT's getting 24mpg and its going to cost $50 to do the same driving distance as the pick-up that costs $250 does that mean your truck is getting <5mpg?

 

It doesn't sound like you bought the PT for "economic" reasons.

Posted

The truck gets 13, the cruiser is advertised at 29.

Hey, Supadave, go piss on someone else's parade.

 

The Cruiser has pretty decent power, too. I can pass at will, even easier than the truck, and yesterday coming home, I took the interstate just for kidcks and that little car had no problem keeping up with a group doing 95mph.

Kickin' stereo, too.

Posted

Same reason I kept my car when I bought my truck. Gas prices suck right now. I drive my car 85% of the time. I usually only drive my truck on weekends or on trips. Yea it's a payment, but isn't that what the good ole USA is about. Debt.

Posted

Yep,Same reason I got my "beater",It gets 25 MPG,Truck gets around 16.

Plus the other reason being the truck stays clean and I keep a lot of miles off of it!

Its been nice the last few winters not having to drive my truck in all that salt and slush. :cheers:

Posted

Drove to Biloxi, MS yesterday to do a little gambling. Four adults and gear ride very comfortably in the Cruiser. Gear included two coolers of beer. Still had enough power to cruise effortlessly at 80-85 moh.

Mileage update soon.

Posted

My truck is my first new non-Ford product. I got a pretty good deal on it, what with the GM employee discount (not from GM's latest sales gimick, my father in law works for GM). I'm paying less to BUY this truck, than I would have to LEASE either an F150 or Ram. The gas mileage isn't too bad either. I just have a regular cab 2WD w/ the 5.3, not the big 4x4's with all the bells and whistles that most people here have. The Ford and Dodge trucks are overweight pigs, my truck is lighter. I see no reason for unnecessary excess weight. I know people say these 5.3's are impressive performers..I won't argue with them, yet...but let's just say I sure hope this thing perks up as it gets miles on it. 2500 so far and it's lacking in the balls department.

Posted

We had a PT Cruiser in addition to the Sierra 2500HD and will admit it did have a lot of room inside and rode pretty nice, easy to park etc. We traded it in on a new Jeep Liberty tho as the PT did have some problems in the deeper snow.

Posted

The one we had was electric blue with silver flames on it (from the factory). It looked pretty cool and had a moonroof it it. It also had a big enough back to hold both a Mastiff and an Irish Wolfhound (at the sametime) for a ride to the vets.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,949
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Gkistler
    Newest Member
    Gkistler
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 881 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...