Jump to content

Wester's Tune On 2007 Sierra Denali


Recommended Posts

Posted

There's a lot of talk of the forum about custom tunes, and having recently had one done I thought I'd share some impressions...

 

The vehicle is an '07 Sierra Denali, and after doing quite a bit of research (primarily on this site and also DenaliTrucks.com) I decided to contact WesterSales (www.westersales.com) to get more information about the Wester's Tune. I emailed back and forth with the owner, a friendly fellow by the name of Butch. These conversations left me confident enough to go ahead and send out my PCM to them. I sent it out to Massachusetts from the Buffalo, New York area on Monday evening and received it back Wednesday afternoon for a total price of 479.00 dollars plus shipping (I used UPS next day air). I went with the 91/93 octane "Hot Tune" which among other things completely eliminates the abuse management. Just to clarify, torque management is separate from abuse management and can only be accessed via the transmission computer, which on the 6L80 is located inside the transmission itself. However, shifts are now a bit firmer and quicker because abuse management also impacts the transmission to a certain degree. I know this point may be a bit contentious, but this is how it was explained to me by Butch, and I have no reason to doubt his expertise. I had Butch optimize the tune for the K&N cold air kit I installed as well. After 500 miles I can say that there is a noticeable improvement in throttle response and overall performance. Butch indicated that it takes about 100 miles to fully realize the benefits of the tune, but it seemed to take about 250 or so for me to really start to notice the difference. You can feel the gains across the RPM range, and WOT shifts now occur at ~5900 RPM as opposed to the factory at ~5500 RPM. The top speed limiter has also been removed - it's nice knowing that although you probably shouldn't ever go over 95 MPH in a truck on public roads, it's nice to know that you can. I can't comment on the promised fuel economy benefits, as I've been too busy romping on the throttle to get an accurate reading ;-)

 

The bottom line is that I'm satisfied with the tune and recommend dealing with Butch at WesterSales. He is very knowledgeable and friendly, and the turnaround on emails and services is nothing short of heroic. If you have 500 dollars to spend on a performance modification to your truck, rest assured this tune is money well spent. There's an awful lot of information out there, and I hope this helps those people looking at tunes and handheld programmers make an informed decision.

Posted

I posted earlier about this tune, I also have the 2007 sierra denali. I found Butch to be absolutely fantastic in every way you can think of. As for the tune itself, I would recommend it to everyone looking for some more pep. My truck is much quicker, better response and it does seem to shift a little better, still not what I would like but I am assuming that this is as good as its gonna get with the 6 speed. As for the learning curve, i have put about 2K miles on the tune and it still seems to be picking up some everyday, I did not find an increase in fuel milage, i was disapointed in that as I do a lot of highway travel. I am averaging 18ish at 75 MPH. As for the high speed, I had the truck up to 115 and it started shaking pretty good, the stock wheels arent holding up too well I suspect but the truck was still pulling hard and i would imagine that it would reach well past 150. for the mods looking for performance This is the best bang for your buck. I looked at others and never could get any replies or answers to my questions, I believe that butch is sitting in front of his computer every 5 minutes to answer any questions.

Posted

I emailed Butch today and explained my situation. I'm looking forward to his reply. In Idaho I can only get 91 octane and I pull a light trailer during steelhead season. Not much just my drift boat. Did you guys get the E/P tuning with 3D mapping for better gas milegae?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 372 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...