Takeda
Member-
Posts
44 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Takeda's Achievements
Enthusiast (2/11)
21
Reputation
-
Shake or Vibration Issues
Takeda replied to Silver space ship's topic in 2014-2018 Silverado & Sierra Troubleshooting
Consumer Reports releases list of vehicles capable of 200K+ miles: https://jalopnik.com/these-are-the-2018-cars-consumer-reports-says-will-make-1823932567 -
Shake or Vibration Issues
Takeda replied to Silver space ship's topic in 2014-2018 Silverado & Sierra Troubleshooting
Added one more feature not available on GM twins -
Shake or Vibration Issues
Takeda replied to Silver space ship's topic in 2014-2018 Silverado & Sierra Troubleshooting
Silverado and Sierra sales continue to drop in February: http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2018/03/best-selling-pickup-trucks-february-2018.html -
Shake or Vibration Issues
Takeda replied to Silver space ship's topic in 2014-2018 Silverado & Sierra Troubleshooting
The F150 is a wise move The following features are available on the F150, but not available on the GM twins: 1) DOHC, 4 valve/cylinder engines 2) Adaptive Cruise Control 3) Blind Spot Monitors 4) 360 degree camera view 5) Rear HVAC vents 6) Keyless ignition 7) Trailer backup assist 8) Aluminum bodies 9) Console shifter The EcoBoost engines have been thoroughly tested, unlike the 5.3L AFM. This video is lengthy, but worth the time: -
Shake or Vibration Issues
Takeda replied to Silver space ship's topic in 2014-2018 Silverado & Sierra Troubleshooting
Another 2016 Silverado vibration problem fixed: -
Shake or Vibration Issues
Takeda replied to Silver space ship's topic in 2014-2018 Silverado & Sierra Troubleshooting
In addition to GM intentionally shipping defective Silverados and Sierras, they are intentionally shipping defective Corvette Z06s: http://blackflag.jalopnik.com/corvette-z06-owners-hit-gm-with-class-action-lawsuit-be-1796070293 -
If you are using a quart of oil every 2K miles in that 3.6L, that engine is not healthy! Another comment on catch cans: Millions of vehicles with DI engines (forced induction, and NA) have run millions, and millions of miles with no problems without a catch can. There has been no long term testing with catch cans. Matter of fact, since they condense water vapor (the major by-product of combustion), this would reduce the cleansing effect that water vapor has internally on an engine! Just something to consider!
-
I wouldn't expect anything less from a catch can salesman! Check this out: Moderator Note: The reposted info from another vehicle forum website that was originally posted here was incomplete and has been removed. FYI....It is also 6 years old. The link I have provided is to the original article which contains some additional info "Direct Injection Fouls Some Early Adopters"
-
I'm a Nikon guy, and photography is a hobby I enjoy. Nikon bodies: D70, D300, D3s, and D4s Nikon lenses (I only buy Nikon): Prime: 10.5mm f/2.8 (DX) 85mm f/1.4 105mm f/2.8 VR 200mm f/4 macro 200mm f/2 VR2 Zoom: 14-24mm f/2.8 17-55mm f/2.8 (DX) 24-70mm f/2.8 70-200mm f/2.8 VR2
-
The real thing:
-
Forum Statistics
246k
Total Topics2.6m
Total Posts -
Member Statistics
-
Who's Online 24 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,554 Guests (See full list)