Jump to content

Friggin' Idiots


Elwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

West Virginia students set fires following upset of Virginia Tech

 

November 21, 2002

 

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. (AP) -- West Virginia students set fires on campus and hundreds tore down the goal posts at Mountaineer Field after the football team's road upset of No. 13 Virginia Tech on Wednesday night.

 

Emergency dispatchers reported that at one point there were fires burning throughout the city. Flames from one reached about 10-feet high as fans threw couches, mattresses, doors, clothes, carpets, firecrackers and anything else they could find into the blaze.

 

Three people were arrested, but police did not disclose the charges. A dispatcher said the department would issue no more information Thursday morning.

 

``We do not condone the type of destructive behavior that occurred last night,'' West Virginia president David Hardesty said Thursday. ``Celebrating a great victory is one thing, but doing it irresponsibly is another. We regret the actions of a few are reflecting poorly on others.''

 

Bumper-to-bumper traffic packed downtown streets as drivers honked their horns in celebration of the win in Blacksburg, Va., hindering emergency response. Firefighters had to use water hoses to disperse the crowds and gain access to a fire that burned too close to a house.

 

Power lines and utility poles burned in several neighborhoods, leading Allegheny Power to shut off power to one area just before midnight. About 170 customers were without power for about three hours, a power company spokesman said.

 

A few students calmly gathered around one fire, rubbing their hands together to stay warm.

 

Others were more raucous, vandalizing road signs, jumping on the hoods of cars and yelling obscenities at police officers.

 

 

 

Hill did you see any of this?

 

I just don't understand why people do such stupid things.  ???

Posted

Ha, Ha, Ha, brings back fond memories of my days in M-town, especially Sunnyside (adjacent to old Mountaineer Field downtown - sort of, for those uninitiated)!!

 

My freshman year (dare I say 1977/78  :eek:  ), we beat Pitt I think it was, and had a huge bon fire in the middle of the street in Sunnyside, couches, chairs, etc - sounds like what happened last nite!  

 

I don't condone it, but some of those students are pretty crazy, always have been @ WVU - must be the Mon River water!!  :eek:

Posted

General:  Thanks if you fixed the title.  If not, thanks to whoever did.

 

 

 

I don't care about the charging the field, or even tearing down the goal posts.  I'm fine with that, even though the goal post thing doesn't make much sense, BUT why set stuff on fire and endanger peoples lives.  It just doesn't make sense.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. The read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
    • I really appreciate the response.  I guess I was confused about torque angle vs torque angle yield.  The individual bolts don't have a warning on reuse but the part number for the LCA nuts does.   Regarding the purpose of the moog grease fittings on their bolts .. Guessing to reduce possibility of corrosion locking the cams or seizing to the bushing inserts.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...