Jump to content

question about pulling a trailer


TXShay85

Recommended Posts

Posted
i will have to be pulling a 2,000 pound trailer around everyday will it be necessary  for me to get a diesel, or will i be fine with a regular V8 1500 silverado?
Posted
I would think that 2000 lbs is well within the capacity of a 1500 with a V8.  You might want to go with the 5.3 for performance reasons but, even the smaller V8 should be fine.
Posted
1500 should do just fine.  With a 2000 lb trailer, it won't even be breaking a sweat.  Plus with the price of diesel fuel and the added expenses of the operating the diesel, you would be much better off with a gasser.
Posted

Even the base 4.3L V6 is rated to pull more than 2,000# (although I wouldn't really want to!)

 

But any of the V8's will do fine.  I've pulled nearly 7,000# for short distances with my 5.3L.  (although I wouldn't want to do that very much either.)

 

Certainly you don't need a diesel for that load.

Posted
Well, the price of the fuel is already an added expense.  Running a fuel conditioner in cold temps sort of adds to that.  Of course price of admission is much more than the gas counterpart.
Posted
Well, the price of the fuel is already an added expense.  

Balderdash!!!!   My fuel costs dropped by almost 35% when I quit towing with gas and switched to diesel.  Granted, the cost per gallon averages about 8% more, but the increase in MPG actually lowers the operating costs.  

 

I don't pretend that diesel is right for everyone (in fact, I advised TXShay85 against the idea).  The increased entry cost is certainly an issue.

 

But if you're going to routinely use a truck for heavy hauling or pulling, then the operating costs of a diesel are lower than gas, and your statement is a myth.

 

By the way, I live in Minnesota, and I don't even know where I could buy fuel conditioner.  Most suppliers here in the northland blend their fuel during cold weather months, or provide side-by-side #2 and #1 pumps and let you make your own custom blend based on expected temperatures.

Posted
In canada during winter they have winter diesel so thats not a problem and as for maintenance costs almost none really and diesels are more dependable long term. A diesel isnt for everyone but they really shine when they pull thats where the fuel economy of a gas motor really declines.
Posted

I'm not going to argue the fact that if you are going to tow heavy loads for long distances, the diesel is better.  But I stand behind the fact that the diesel is going to cost you more unless you put more than a 130k miles a year.  

 

If you can assume that the gas and diesel trucks cost the same except for the engine.  The Dmax engine is a $5010 premium.  Assuming regular unleaded is $1.50 a gallon and that you tow a 2000lb load 20k miles per year and you get 10 mpg with the gas.  For the gasser, at 10 mpg you get a range of 270 miles.  Annualized fuel cost is roughly $3000.  Using your figure of 35% less yields $2222.22 for the diesel.  This is a difference of $777.78 per year.  Just with that, it would take 6.4 years to just recoup the engine cost.  This doesn't even take into account the cost difference of the 1500 vs 2500HD.  I went through the same calculations a few years ago to try to justify getting a diesel.  It would take a while before I would start seeing any savings.  Or maybe I missed something.

Posted
I'm not going to argue the fact that if you are going to tow heavy loads for long distances, the diesel is better.  But I stand behind the fact that the diesel is going to cost you more unless you put more than a 130k miles a year.  

 

If you can assume that the gas and diesel trucks cost the same except for the engine.  The Dmax engine is a $5010 premium.  Assuming regular unleaded is $1.50 a gallon and that you tow a 2000lb load 20k miles per year and you get 10 mpg with the gas.  For the gasser, at 10 mpg you get a range of 270 miles.  Annualized fuel cost is roughly $3000.  Using your figure of 35% less yields $2222.22 for the diesel.  This is a difference of $777.78 per year.  Just with that, it would take 6.4 years to just recoup the engine cost.  This doesn't even take into account the cost difference of the 1500 vs 2500HD.  I went through the same calculations a few years ago to try to justify getting a diesel.  It would take a while before I would start seeing any savings.  Or maybe I missed something.

Yes, I think you're missing something.

 

First, you're comparing apples and oranges when you bring up the difference in price between a 1500 and a 2500HD.  The discussion is simply between gas and diesel.

 

Second, the discussion started out about operating costs.  You've introduced the additional concept of ownership cost ($5010 cost premuim).  

 

Be that as it may, the diesel is still more economical over a reasonable term of ownership.

 

Let's compare two identical trucks, differing only in gas vs. diesel.  Both are 2500HD, one with Duramax diesel and the other with Vortec 8.1L.   The purchase cost difference (presuming we both pay full sticker) is $4,160.  We both drive the trucks for 4 years and them sell them.

 

My fuel savings over the 4 years, using your example would be 4 x $777.78, or $3,111.12.  So from an operating cost standpoint, I am the clear winner.

 

Now we go to sell the trucks.  Comparing NADA prices for 4-year old vehicles, the diesel will bring a sale price premium averaging about $3,000, which means that my net ownership cost is $1,160 more than yours.  

 

In other words, the combined ownership and operating costs over a period of 4 years favor the Duramax by $1951.12.

 

And, oh by the way, after 4 years/80,000miles your factory warranty is a distant memory, but the new owner of my Duramax engine still has 20,000 miles remaining under warranty.  

 

Sunuvagun!

Posted

You shouldn't have a problem with  the 1500  pulling 2000 lbs.

 

My Grandfather Tows cars frequently  with his Ram-Charger (I know, I know. I'm comparing a Shotgun to a Rifle, but still)

Posted
i will have to be pulling a 2,000 pound trailer around everyday will it be necessary  for me to get a diesel, or will i be fine with a regular V8 1500 silverado?

No problem with that trailer.  If you have either V8 (5.3/4.8) you can tow up to 5000lbs without any problems and a little more if you're careful and know what you're doing.  

 

BTW-GM recommends trailer brakes for anything over 2000lbs.  I pulled twice that without brakes several times when I had my  Silverado 1500 5.3L but you will definitely need some extra stopping distance.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 485 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...