Jump to content

Tranny Flush or Drop Pan?


Recommended Posts

Posted

My truck is pushing the 50,000mi mark and planning some maintance. I am getting mixed info on what to do. Do I have the pan dropped and filter replaced or flushed. Everyone says something different. What are you guys having done at 50K??

 

Thanks!

 

:devil:

Posted

I bought my 01 Silverado used with 20K miles on it and was told the previous owner pulled a travel trailer. I felt like a transmission fluid change would be a smart move, but wondered the same thing you are. My decision was made by my local dealer who was doing flushes and that was backed by a transmission failure warranty. I decided to go with the flush and don't feel I made a mistake. I received a written warranty in the mail about a month after my service. If I had to do it again I'd do the flush.

 

Best of luck with what ever your decision is.

 

Vroten :devil:

Posted

From what I hear, a flush would be good to do. Former posts have directions on this.

Dropping the pan does not get near enough of the old fluid out. I guess up to 60-70% of the old fluid remains on just dropping the pan. So, flush it and get all of the old fluid out. :devil:

Posted

If I remember I believe mine was in the $140 range. And that was at the stealership. Overall I didn't think the price was that bad.

 

Vroten :devil:

Posted

posted before:

 

You need to get ALL the old stuff out. Some tranny flush machines will give a reading of the filter blockage, too, before digging in to replace it. Five years ago, I dropped the pan, replaced the filter, then did a flush with ATF, then replaced the filter again. Expensive, but got all of the old stuff out and started with all synthetic and a clean filter.

Posted

My truck has a drain plug on the transmission pan. So assuming you do too, you could drain the fluid, add and then drop the pan and change the filter and atf again. Does anybody know if the torque converter has a drain plug? I know older cars use to have one!

Posted

Drop the pan, power flush, change filter, replace pan, fill up with ATF. I did this a 35,000 miles and went to 100% synthetic.

 

The dealer was just going to flush with NO filter change and no dropped pan. The flush and fill was $120 with me providing 5 gallons of Amsoil ATF.

 

Cheers, Doug

Posted

Auto tranny fluid can go bad in less than 1,000 miles if abused (held at stall with large throttle setting for long peroids of time...like towing)

 

Pan drop and filter only gets 4-5 quarts fresh fluid.

 

Whole tranny system has 12-16 quarts capacity (4L60E - 4L80E) and transfusion will get most of it out.

 

I DIY all the time. Takes about 1-2 hours.

Posted

I've got a 2003 2500 HD 4x4

I tow a travel trailer with some of the towing taaking place over the mountains. Am couple weeks ago , at 31,500 mles I had the fluid flushed by a shop that had a good flushing machine. They garunteed me that all the old fluid would be circulated out. I watched as the attendant filled one side of the machine with new bright red synthetic trans fluid He used 22 quarts Castrol dexronIII synthetic.

once the machine began pumping the fluid throug the trans lines I could see the dirty fluid draining out. The old fluid was dark dirty red. after about 15 quarts had circulated the suction side stream was beginning to look much cleaner. by the time all 22 quarts had been pumped through the suction side look clean bright red.

 

The cost for fluid and labor was $135.00. I don't think I will wait as long to flush it the next time.

 

As I understand it the newer transmissions only have a screen not a filter. I think it would be a waste to drop the pan.

 

Next month I'm going to have the front and rear diffs drained and refilled with synthetic oil and the transfer case as well.

Posted

I think it depends on what you do with your truck. If you do a lot of towing or city driving, start-stop, then a flush wouldn't be a bad idea. If you mostly drive highway I would think dropping the pan and changing filter would be fine. With that said, I didn't do anything to mine until 100,000 miles. Other than a four wheeler trailer I don't pull heavy loads and do mostly highway driving. I dropped the pan and changed filter. No problems here with 115,000 miles. I thought about a flush but all mechanics said that they didn't change the filter. Everybody is going to have their own opinions. Do what you feel comfortable with. My 2 cents.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
    • IF,IF,IF. If they cared about quality instead of profit and this applies to any company, what a concept. 
    • Good Morning Gents..hope everyone is enjoying a beautiful saturday morning. I have a 2001 GMC Sierra that I bought used in 2018. I am the 2nd owner and its a beautiful truck. Ive put about 60,000 miles on it and recently the front end has felt funny. Kind of loose when hitting bumps adn sometimes I actually feel a "bang" in the steering wheel. I took it to a local guy who said that everything was tight and he tightened the steering box. It didnt feel much better, so I had him replace the front shocks, which had noto been done since I bought it. It had the check enging light on so I took it into a local garage to fix that and check out the suspension. Everything is original and the rubber bushings that I can see look bad. They said everything was tight and there wasnt any play in the front end. Im concerned about the banging feeling in the wheel. Ive been driving this truck for 8 years, so I know how it usually feels and this is something new. Its a second vehicle, so I dont drive it all the time, but Im trying to use it more often. I live out in the country and some of the  roads are kind of rough and I alive on gravel roads. Anyone deal with anything like this before? 
    • Yes of course. There’s no experience in the Trump organization in hiring contractors. it’s not like they’re experienced in that field.😆
    • Well, 2 no-bid contracts to donors didn't seem to result in a good job...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...