Jump to content

Rough Idle, Service Stabilitrak, Service TC, PO 122 PO 223

Patrick Afams
 Share

Recommended Posts

Patrick Afams New Member

Patrick Afams

Posted
Posted

Was trying to find the thread that started talking about this issue, couldn’t find it. I’ve fixed the issue with spontaneous “stabilitrak, tc PO 122, 223 and rough idle”

 

The throttle body needs to be replaced. Buy an OE Dorman or genuine replacement part or it will be a pain to fix, the relearn procedure WILL take longer than it should with rebuilds and Hitatchi units.

 

The reason the throttle body is the issue is simple; traction control and stabilitrak both need to make use of the electronically controlled throttle body to work. When TC is on and your rear tires start to spin, it shuts the butterfly valve to lower RPM’s so your tires stop spinning. The rough idle is thanks to the butterfly valve opening intermittently or poorly.

 

The PO codes I think are from a bad capacitor or something inside the bad throttle body. Maybe it ruptures or there’s corrosion on a resistor that overloads/starves the electrical system and causes it to malfunction. Can the original broken unit be rebuilt? Maybe, but I wouldn’t trust a shop unless they really know their way around GMT900’s. 

 

Most idle issues stem from the throttle body, not MAF or temp sensors. My dad and I both have matching 2011 tahoes. He’s been on his 3rd throttle body for a couple months, I’m on my 3rd now.

 

After replacing the unit, the PO codes still showed but the truck drove perfect so I guess they were still there from before? Not entirely sure.

 

While you have the throttle body off, it’s also a good time to pull the intake and clean it as best you can. I’m at 207k miles and I had a LOT of carbon buildup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • revmanii
      Starting a new thread regarding mounting my 2014 OEM wheels to my 2026

      By revmanii · Posted

      The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • Atlas
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Atlas · Posted

      My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • Buckwild27
      Gas Prices

      By Buckwild27 · Posted

      I agree. 
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...