Jump to content

Stewart facing penalty?


antig24

Recommended Posts

Posted

DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. -- Tony Stewart's actions following Sunday's Aaron's 499 at Talladega Superspeedway were being reviewed Monday afternoon by NASCAR officials to determine if further action by the sanctioning body was necessary.

 

"We're reviewing (Stewart's actions)," NASCAR spokesman Mike Zizzo said. "And gathering facts on what occurred to determine what we might do."

 

Stewart caused one accident during the race when he hit Kurt Busch and was on the receiving end of some similar contact later in the race from Jimmie Johnson that sent Stewart spinning.

 

After the second incident, which brought out the race's next-to-last of a record 11 caution periods, Stewart was forced to pit for new tires.

 

He only drove back to 22nd position before the final caution forced the race to end under a yellow flag, with Jeff Gordon the winner.

 

Neither of those events brought NASCAR's glare on Stewart, though a number of drivers were irate over his role in the first, 11-car accident.

 

He was being reviewed because, after taking the checkered flag at about 70 mph behind the pace car, he abruptly turned 90 degrees to the left, onto the track's asphalt apron heading into Turn 1.

 

When he did, Stewart's car made contact with the front of Terry Labonte's car, causing it heavy damage, according to a team spokesman.

 

Stewart drove up pit road in the opposite direction from the rest of the field, causing at least one television correspondent to report Sunday evening he and his co-workers had "feared for their safety" upon Stewart's actions.

 

Stewart stopped at NASCAR's checkpoint to get the proper angle of his car's rear spoiler verified, and then drove into the garage area.

 

Stewart made no comment about the incident in post-race remarks to the media. He did say that both the accident involving Busch and the one with Johnson were blameless consequences of restrictor plate racing.

 

A statement issued by Stewart's public relations representative said the driver turned abruptly off the racetrack to avoid debris being hurled onto the racetrack by fans.

 

Many in the crowd were disgruntled either by NASCAR's decision to place Jeff Gordon in front of Dale Earnhardt Jr. for the finish, or the fact that NASCAR did not attempt to restart the race, which took the final caution with four laps remaining.

 

Labonte was testing Monday at Kentucky Speedway and was not available for comment. A team representative said the damage caused by Stewart's move appeared more extensive than that incurred in the 11-car wreck, after which Labonte's Hendrick Motorsports crew had replaced his car's nosepiece.

 

NASCAR's competition staff, including Nextel Cup Series director John Darby, typically meets each Monday afternoon to discuss the weekend's events. Stewart would be discussed at that session, Zizzo said.

Posted

Stewart should clearly be fined for causing the multicar accident as well as NASCAR for developing restrictor plates that enable 43 cars to run 0.00001 seconds apart at 200mph and Talladega for building a large, fast race track.

 

secaondly, maybe Stewart "feared for his safety" from the barrage of beer cans of 160,000 little E fans upset their boy didn't win.

 

Like he said script a script for the drivers to run lap by lap and all this rough driving and controversy will end.

Posted

Tony has been running a lot of people over this year, but I say let the drivers handle it themselves. NASCAR doesn't need anymore crappy rules.

 

As far as what happened with the 5 car, can you really blame the guy for wanting off that track ASAP.

 

Kenny

Posted
It seems like everything Tony does gets 'reviewed by NASCAR'. They should give the guy a break. :)

Tony proved today in California why NASCAR has it's eye on him.

Posted

Tony was a long leash for awhile and now NASCAR has shortened the leash alot. I think Tony is looking for that edge and looking to be the bad boy of NASCAR again. Let Tony be Tony because it is good for NASCAR.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,960
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    doylej24
    Newest Member
    doylej24
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 755 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ok I missed that part that yours is a GM. The strange part is that the choice for year ranges and within the year of 2026 is different on the Sierra then on the Chev for some reason as I am looking at my tool at the Sierra choices. Now I am guessing you see as to your sensor part number as it may be different on your truck for some reason and a call to GM should get you the part model number of the sensors you should have as well as which MHz your sensors are. I know mine are the ones as per what I listed but there are other choices in the Autel and got me wondering if by some chance they put different ones in your truck. Having said that, did you try using each of the choices starting from No 1 and going on down the list, not sure if that would mean shutting off the engine each time and resetting the tool and going at it again each time. Also I thought of something else which may sound retarded but if there was some stupid chance that the chev choice would work. The reason I say that is that the Sierra is showing a range up to 06/2026 for the various choices of sensors it could be where as the Chev has one choice that has that 12/2026. By the way it is possible to not run the truck and you may know that as per not pressing the brake but pressing and holding the start button for a few seconds and it lights up the dash ( its called service mode ) but that sucks battery power and if it were me doing it that way I would be throwing on a decent sized battery charger before doing it that way as killing your battery won't make you happy at me at all !.    Like I say, just a thought to try the Chev choices if you have already exhausted the Sierra choices but first it would be nice to know for sure what exact sensor model and hertz your truck uses as I assume only those choices that mention the sensor would work unless a choice that does not mention the sensor model would somehow work. Its frustrating when one is trying to use tools like this without the experience of the tool and the vehicle, as I am sure dealer techs themselves struggle with it when starting out or a new model year comes along that is slightly different. 
    • I tried before I updated the scan tool just incase an update messed it up, but it never worked so I updated the scan tool and it still didn't work.   Only difference is I click on Sierra not Chevrolet cause I have a Sierra.   If I click on 2026-2024 I didn't have any option to change placard, when I click on 2023 it does give me the option but when I try to do it,.it says vehicle not supported!   I have my region or market or whatever it is set to America I think, is that what yours is set to?
    • Its just that it worked on 2024 trucks on this forum and my 2025 model truck, unless GM did something since that point to screw up access or Autel has a bad update. I haven't had need to use my tool since last year when I did the changes to the placard pressure settings and since then I updated the software on my Autel but have not plugged into the OBD so hard to say if I would get a surprise as well.    All I know last year when I bought the Autel I was warned to be sure to update it before I tried using the unit as they said who knows how long ago unit itself was actually manufactured as the software could be way out of date. 
    • And so you had gone through the process of registering and updating the tool and so on ?. All I can say is that on the front page as the tool fires up you go to advanced mode, then vehicle model comes up and you choose Silverado ( not the DRW or EV  since your a single rear wheel ) , then I think its choice 2 which is 07/2021 - 12/2026 ( 433mhz 13542523 ) as that is the series of tpms sensors and then go down to choice 5 which is tire type/pressure selection. Hit yes and it says to connect to OBD port and turn ignition on.    Having said this, I updated the software in my tool lately and these year range choices look different from the past due to them doing some updates it would appear and I have not connected up to the OBD port since last year so hopefully I am not in for a surprise with them screwing up the software and that it won't work on my truck anymore either.    So my question is, when you plugged into the OBD and started your truck it had that message on the Autel screen "vehicle not supported" ?. That does seem odd as tire shops would be pissed right off if hey can't use their tool on the model year after mine that in theory is supposed to be much the same truck ... unless GM did some change in the computer system to block certain things from access. 
    • Understanding and using modern scan tools is its own body of knowledge. I had little hope that would work...programming access to the BCM is probably required and that is not easy for us consumers. Expensive scan tool, GM programming subscription, online authentication, etc.   It also may be a matter of finding the right dealer to program it for you. Flashing a modern BCM might be a little too advanced for most tire shops.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...