Jump to content

My 8.1 Crew track times, stockish


Recommended Posts

Posted

I met up with the Houston area LS1Tech.com truck crew. I made 7 runs trying different launch techniques and stuff. I didn't make any changes from street trim or remove any wieght, in fact it wieghed in at a bridge buckling 7,180 lbs :D race wieght. Best run with the crappy torque managment ruining my 60' times was a 16.551 @ 83.2. Doing the math for MPH indicates that's 323 HP at the wheels which is nice. The bad part was I never had a chance against anyone I ran. But it was fun just seeing what it would do. I broke something in the electronics, nothing major just a couple of communication codes. I wanted to remove the hypertech tuning and see what up but the problem prevented any reprogramming.

 

My mods are: Volant intake with home brew ram air, Hypertech programmer, and dual Flowmasters.

 

Some of the guys ran 12's on spray and cam, many 13's, 14's, and my mid 16 LOL.

 

My GF was all disapointed, our truck isn't fast anymore, those guys didn't impress me with their runs, it's too cold, you didn't tell me I couldn't ride along in the races, bla bla bla. :thumbs: I picked a race with another 2500HD crew on the way home and held him off so I feel a little better. Most fools on the street who pick races must run 17's+.

 

Here's a link to the pics, my truck is the BIG black one. My mods to increase girth are: Ranch Hand bumpers, tool box, spray in bed, some amps and a sub-woofers box under the rear seat. I wieghed about 180 of the 7180 :banghead:

LS1Tech, Truck general, Houston meet pics.

Posted
16.55 is nothing to sneer at with a big HD truck.  Not to shabby.

 

 

 

 

No doubt, getting 7,000lbs to move that quick is damned impressive!

 

Have you taken yours to the track yet Linda? I'd be curious to see how the tune and shorter gear set help... I know my Wester's tune made a night and day difference in my measly 4.8L. :thumbs:

Posted

nah, not yet.....i wanna get it to the dyno first. I think early March I will get to the dyno. The nearest one to me is about an hour away.

Posted

Haulin' 8.1: Like your ride. Very similar to mine, right down to the Volant & Revo's!

 

7,100 lbs? Man, I though I was closer to the 6,000 mark. Oh well...even more impressive that my 8.1 cc can beat my brother's 5.4 Tahoe!

 

Just installed Westers a few weeks ago. Feels stronger and seem to be getting a little better MPG. Mine's an 04.

 

Take care and PM me when you get your horsepower numbers back. I'm curious to see what you are putting to the ground. D.

Posted

I tried several different launch methods. One thing is for sure, unless you need to heat up your tires try to avoid the water box as much as possible. With the torque management and big A/T tires there's normally not much spin out anyway, but if the tires are still wet from the water box it's a Sit N'Spin ordeal when you hammer down. The truck will burn out if needed to dry them off, without much effort.

 

I made several runs in 4HI and 2HI and overall 2HI produced the best times by about 1.5 tenths and 2 MPH. The best runs came by taking the torque managment by surprise, just idleing in gear then flooring it. It seems that power braking gives the ECM more time to reduce power and produces slower acceleration, that or the added friction of holding the brakes firm against the motor drug it down off the start.

 

With 265/70-16's and 3.73's the truck was shifting into 4th just before the lights at about 78-80 MPH.

 

Vernon

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...