Jump to content

6.0L mods that finally worked for me


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well I have been putz'ing around with my truck for over a year now doing this and that and I am now down to what I think works for me. Installed a K&N filter into the stock airbox (returned the aftermarket intake), running true dual exhaust (2 turbo cherry bombs 3" in and 3" out) {done 800 miles into the trip}, and a Predator tuner running the 87 octane tune.

 

One way I averaged about 7.8 mpg for about 800 miles of my trip running around 15800 pounds total weight.

 

While in Flordia I had the Turbo exhaust and installed the K&N filter. Ran around emtpy and my truck finally saw 17.8 mpg's on RTE 192 running from Melbourne, FL to Kissimmee, FL and back with the A/C set around 68 degrees.

 

Then hooked up and came home this past weekend. WOW gone two weeks and gas went up 30 cents. Anyway... Running around the same weight (less 50 gallons of water) and averaged 9-12 mpg's. 9 mpg was running in clean air and the 11-12's were running on the tail of a 18 wheeler.

 

No matter what I did, straight pipes, tuner, aftermarket intake, blah blah nothing really worked. It seems this setup I have now works the best and it was the cheapest. Go figure. From what I have seen not much else can be done for mpg's.

 

$400 for the predator (gave me about 2 mpg's better)

$48 for the K&N

$291 for the 2 Turbo mufflers installed and exit in-front of the passenger side tire.

 

So I went from 10/11 mpg's prior to the tuner to the now 15+ mpg's. So for all in all $800.00 gave me 5+mpg's better (130 more miles a tank with the truck empty). So as of current for every 2 tanks of gas I am going the mileage of the previous 3 tanks. A savings of roughly $48 dollars a week.

 

I wish I would have just did this in the first place versus the trial and error that costs lots of $$$ :sigh: . (althought many items I have been able to return :seeya: )

Posted

What is the details on your truck?

 

Like cab size, tires size, and bed size, 4x4, transmission?????

 

I have the Predeator programmer (87 tune) and the K & N aire filter and 285 tires, I get about 9mpg pulling a 6500lb trailer and 11.7mpg average empty.

 

I am trying to decide if I should go back down to the stock size tires and see if this will improve my milage. I just don't like the size of the stock tires.

Posted

I have a 2004 2500HD 4x4 ext. Cab. shortbed. I have the 4l80e tranny. I am also running the stock size tires.

 

Oh...Also I was pulling a 29FBS Jayco travel trailer loaded for two weeks of vacation. Although the actual feet is just over 32 feet. With the bed of the truck loaded (grill, extra propane for the grill, 4 bikes, concrete blocks for the trailer stablizers, etc.)

 

When pulling I was running around 65-70 mph. Any more than that I could not stay in OD. Depending on the head wind I would have to drop down to 60-65 to stay in OD. When I was running behind the 18 wheelers I could run 75+ in OD as they were the ones breaking the wind for me.

 

But one thing I stay out of the pedal when I can. I watch the DIC instant economy and try to keep it as high as I can. Very seldom do I break 2000 RPM's when acelerating. Now if I keep my foot in it the mpg's suffer badly but she is FUN to drive :( But with gas going up to over 2.50 a gallon no more tire burning for me.

 

One thing I do want to share. With this load I hit the gas a light (the wife ticked me off) to the floor and the truck left two nice long rubber trails and smoke. :thumbs: Of course it confirmed my maturity level to the wife :lol:

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Is the 87 tune for the Predator only available for the newer pickups or does it apply to the 99-02 predators? I just received my predator today for my 2002 2500HD 6.0 and it only allows "performance tune". Do you have to have the 87 tune specially programmed?

Thanks

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 408 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...