Jump to content

Thoughts on SuperChargers?


Recommended Posts

Posted

About a week ago I had asked about the best way to make a 5.3 fast. Many of you responded to rip it and put in a 6.0. Since I have decided just to look into an SS truck with the 6.0 pre-installed.

 

But one question still remains, what about a supercharger? I have a co-worker that really slammed the idea of wasting money to get one installed. While I value his opinion I am thinking maybe he just got a bad deal.

 

Any of you running them? What has been your experiences? What are the downfalls? Would you do it again?

Posted

I supercharged my 5.3 and i love it. Whats not to love about more horses? The install was easy. My bubby and i did the install in about 6 hours!

Posted

super chargers are a good way to increase your power. The idea behind them, is to pressurize the intake, more air in and more gas to go with it. personally, I like them, I wish someone made one for my truck. But I seem to have a forgotten engine that noone wants to support with performance parts.

Posted

I realize the best part about a charger is the horsepower. But I have not done enough research yet to determine which brand gives you the most and works the best.

 

But moreso, I was looking for any potential pitfalls. My co-worker had pointed out that adding a supercharger would probably reduce my engine life to about 50k if I drove fairly conservative. Are there any actual users that can support or deny this claim?

 

While I want to go fast, I don't want a vehicle that will be continually breaking down on me.

Posted
Any of you running them?  What has been your experiences?  What are the downfalls?  Would you do it again?

 

 

 

put a magnacharger radix on my 2k ecsc w/5.3, has 6" lift 315/75/16 bfg mt tires and 4.56 gears, is my daily driver.

 

was a complete kit with intercooler, fairly easy install, was and has been problem free except my install error, put throttle body gasket on backwards and had a high idle on start up, easy fix, runs great, got solid power gains through rpm range.

 

only drawback is have to run 91 or better gas and you get lead foot disease, and tend to wear tires down faster.

 

i would do it again in a heart beat. i love it.

Posted
I realize the best part about a charger is the horsepower.  But I have not done enough research yet to determine which brand gives you the most and works the best.

 

But moreso, I was looking for any potential pitfalls.  My co-worker had pointed out that adding a supercharger would probably reduce my engine life to about 50k if I drove fairly conservative.  Are there any actual users that can support or deny this claim?

 

While I want to go fast, I don't want a vehicle that will be continually breaking down on me.

 

 

 

the magnacharger only runs 5-6 psi of boost under load, and has bypass so there is no boost at idle and cruise, will have minimul effect on motor lifespan, with proper mantainence motor should last.

Posted

id say superchargers are nice for the daily driver.. "daily"... but if youre looking for some go fast juice under the hood then what about one of those sts turbo systems, they cost about the same as a non intercooled s/c dont they?

Posted

When you consider the ammount of turbos and superchargers on new vehicles from the factory that have no problem. The only way I can see the life being reduced is if you use the wrong fuel, and do not do maintence on your machine. Oh yeah, and if there is a incorrect installation.

Posted

The supercharger principle was designed with efficiency and power in mind. A supercharged engine that is in good shape when the supercharger is put on should last well over the the original factory lifespan if the proper maintenance is performed, correct gasoline/components are used and the engine is not consistantly held above its RPM range(in tha red). Superchargers are not made to be installed on a vehicle to be driven like a granny car. As long as the RPM range is kept into consideration the supercharged engine should last considerably longer with excellent maintenance. And you have the go fast whenever you want it. I am going to install a Magnacharger on my 8.1L soon, and it has 126,000 miles on it.

 

:dupe:

 

:P

 

:mad:

Guest chevydeerhunter
Posted

If you think about it, superchargers helped the US and other ally forces win WWII as they were used on our fighters. They've been around for generations and have withstood the test of time and technology. Although you may respect your friend's opinion, I doubt his thoughts are valid because of the "50k mile reduced engine life" comment. I'm not saying he's an idiot, just that the comments are unfounded. I used to run a Weiand 6-71 blower on my small block 400 in my '69 GTO with absolutely no problems. Even when the belt broke(which is almost impossible with a 4" wide belt), the engine still got me home. That was a roots type blower and I'm sure you're looking into a screw type or a centrifugal type blower. The latter have come a long way and are self contained units that are very reliable both on the street and strip. The advantage of these superchargers are the instant throttle response and low maintenance.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Not that this is a viable option for a true daily driver, but since when has anybody that really wanted to go fast been worried about breaking things? Anyway, a company based out of Europe called Rotrex has been developing a twin supercharger sytem for the Chevy 6.0 Tahoes and it should be interchangeable to the trucks. Not sure who they teamed up with here in the states, read it in a magazine. The Tahoe, now that I think, uses a single supercharger, and makes somewhere around 100+ extra horses at the wheels. The twin screw set up is supposed to bring in 900+ at the crank on a 6.0. Been thinking of doing this on my 02 HD, maybe with a Banks Duramax intercooler. But then again, I'm a little crazy when it comes to ideas for powerplants.

Posted

And before you ask, I'm not a spoiled rich kid, I just dream big. All I've got right now is a K&N intake, Hughes trans pan, MSD coils and plug wires, and a whole lot of wishin.

Posted

Wow, this thread resurfaced to the top. I just wanted to say thanks to all that commented. Since posting I discovered the 6.0L option in a VortecMax package. I'm seriously considering the bigger motor over the supercharger, but so far the budget is screaming 5.3 and then add the supercharger when I get a nice Christmas bonus or tax return!

 

It sounds like the Magna Radix charger is the way to go. I do like to go fast, but don't plan on running to down the strip every weekend. Depending how well developed and tested the dual charger system is I might consider that. It sounds very impressive! :flag:

 

Again, thanks to all that responded. Feel free to keep the responses coming. :banghead:

Posted
Wow, this thread resurfaced to the top.  I just wanted to say thanks to all that commented.  Since posting I discovered the 6.0L option in a VortecMax package.  I'm seriously considering the bigger motor over the supercharger, but so far the budget is screaming 5.3 and then add the supercharger when I get a nice Christmas bonus or tax return!

 

It sounds like the Magna Radix charger is the way to go.  I do like to go fast, but don't plan on running to down the strip every weekend.  Depending how well developed and tested the dual charger system is I might consider that.  It sounds very impressive!  :flag:

 

Again, thanks to all that responded.  Feel free to keep the responses coming.  :banghead:

 

 

 

 

Have you driven the 5.3? Mine has no power issue!

Posted

A supercharger,turbo,and nitrous are all great power adders.It just depends on what you are looking for and what you want to invest.There are several great kits of all 3.Just pick the one you want to deal with and have the money to invest.I have a friend with a 01 Silverado with a Squires turbo kit and it makes crazy power.And they are not that bad involved to install.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Without knowing how bad your banging is, one suggestion is the intermediate steering shaft on the steering wheel. These used to be a problem on 800 and earlier series. The feeling/sound was sometimes described as "clunking" and was felt in the wheel. Also there is a plastic piece in the lower column that is referred to as a bearing. Not your traditional looking bearing though. Your ball joints, bushings and tie rods or steering rack (if equipped) are the main point of issues. You never mention total unit miles, only that you've put 60k on it.   You can search the site for help on the ISS description. Plenty of these have been replaced   https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=site%3Agm-trucks.com+intermediate+steering+shaft&ia=web
    • Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm  and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe  and   stated she can not belive the difference.
    • Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.
    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...