Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A buddy of mine bought a 1968 C-10 Custom truck that is about 70% restored.  He says it has a factory 350 with a 2bbl.  I thought that the 350 didn't come out til 1969.  It also has a HEI distributor.  He also claim's it was original.  I thought they still had points systems back then too?

He's the same guy with the 76 C-10, which I'm about 90% ready to buy for ?.  

 

Posted

Yes, yes, and yes....

The 350 came out in '67 and '68 for Camaros only, and wasn't available in other cars or trucks until 1969, except for a few Novas with 350s in '68.

'68 Trucks had a choice of 307 ci or 327 ci for small blocks, 396 for big blocks.

HEI wasn't introduced until 1975, although I think a few models had it in '74 as a "trial run".

I think you should jump on the '76 C-10, '76 was a good year for Chevy trucks (at least I think so!)

Jeff

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Quote from 76BBSub, posted on Aug. 06 2001,5:23

I think you should jump on the '76 C-10, '76 was a good year for Chevy trucks (at least I think so!)

 

 

I agree

 

My dad bought a '76 brand new back in the day and that thing ran like hell until the day he sold it after he bought the '87 Suburban he has today.

 

-Mike

Posted

I'd be careful buying anything from someone that doesn't know HEI wasn't available in '68.  I'd be wondering what else he "didn't" know while owning/working on the truck. (I've seen some nasty mechanical work in my time!)

 

The only thing I can think of that even comes close to the HEI in older vehicles is the transistor ignitions.  I don't know if trucks ever had them but I do know the full size Chevy's and Chevelles had that option going to the early 60's.

 

There were 350's with 2 barrels originally on the full size Chevy's and probably others but not sure on trucks. That supposed 350 might be a 307 as they were first introduced for 1968.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...