Jump to content

Auto Loan


MarkG

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am wanting to trade up to a bigger truck that I have been eyeing, but I have to make it appealing to the wife.  Most banks I have talked to have quoted 7.24% for 72 months.  I did see that PeopleFirst.com is offering 6.20% for 72 months.  Any better deals out there?

 

It is a used truck that I am looking at, 2001 GMC Z71.

 

Thanks for the help

 

Mark

Posted

Check out www.carbuyingtips.com

There's a lot of info on there about loans as well as ggod advice on car buying strategies.

Posted

I just did a complete changeover of vehicles and checked with peoplefirst and also with Wells Fargo Online.  Wells Fargo Online had a 60month at 5.14% and i extended out to 72 for 6.09% with no down (assuming good credit).  They blew the doors off my credit union which usually has a better rate.  Good luck.  It would be nice to take advantage of the rebate that is out there $2000, I sure enjoyed it!  Traded in my 00 1500 LT for an 03 2500HD LT.

 

Good luck

Posted

For the fun of it, you might want to run some numbers on a new truck at 0% interest.  You may find your payments may be close to the same amount or a tad bit more but you would be the proud owner new GM truck even if they are butt ugly.  I believe GMAC still has 0% for 36 months and slightly higher rates for 48, and 60 month terms. Call me a tight wad, but a 72 months term (6 years) on a USED 2001 truck is way out of line in my opinion and you will most likely be financially upside down in it until at least 2006 even at a 5% interest rate.  That means you will be stuck with it and will not be able to sell it or trade it without taking it in the shorts.  

 

You will always pay a higher interest rate on used vehicles apposed to new. The down side about the 0% interest rate deal is qualifying. Unfortunately, I have heard many people comment that getting approved for GMAC’s 0% is very difficult.  I have a 02’ Taco Z71 at 0% for 60 months through GMAC as well as a 01’ Silverado HD at .9% for 48 months through GMAC.  I have always felt that if I had to make payments for more than 4 years on a vehicle, I shouldn’t buy it because I can’t afford it.  Granted, I have a Taco on a 5-year term but it is at 0% interest and I bought it under GM employee discount so the payments are slightly north of $500 and I can earn interest on the money I am saving…. not much but better than none. The 0% GMAC interest rate is basically like free money and I am only paying principle with no interest.  Just think if you could buy a house at 0% interest.  Tttthat would be cool Beavis! :D

Posted

Just about every dealer in town is offering $0.00 down and 0% finance on new rides. I would seriously look into that. :thumb:

 

It's amazing how the banks and financial institutions charge 5-9% on money you want to borrow but, will only give you .25-2% on money you have. :D

Posted
It's amazing how the banks and financial institutions charge 5-9% on money you want to borrow but, will only give you .25-2% on money you have. :devil:

Not amazing at all. It's the principle upon which lending institutions are founded. Good old free enterprise that we love and defend !!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. The read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
    • I really appreciate the response.  I guess I was confused about torque angle vs torque angle yield.  The individual bolts don't have a warning on reuse but the part number for the LCA nuts does.   Regarding the purpose of the moog grease fittings on their bolts .. Guessing to reduce possibility of corrosion locking the cams or seizing to the bushing inserts.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...