Jump to content

Tire pressure help?


Recommended Posts

Posted
Well, my 4 day old '03 K2500 Sub got its first mod.  I traded the weenie stock tires in and got a set of 285/75-16 Goodyear Wranglet MTR's.  These things look mean!  I need some recommendations on tire pressures, though.  The door sticker on the Sub says 50psi front and 80psi rear.  That seems kinda crazy to me.  I would like to set the pressure so that the ride is not overly harsh, but the tires still need to be able to handle the load of the Sub plus a large trailer.  Any advice would be greatly appreciated!!!
Posted

I run my 265/75/16 load range "E" Michilins @ 50 psi frt and rear.

 

80 psi rear is the max, and is recommended for when you have a full load both in and behind your Suburban.  ( like 4 passengers and 1500 lb tounge wt and 10,000 lb trailer.)

 

You didn't mention what "load range" your new MTR's are, and you definatly don't want to exceed the max pressure that is on their sidewalls.

 

Also with 285's on the narrow stock wheels you don't want too much air in them or they will crown and you will quickly wear out the centers of your new tires.

Posted
It's interesting because my stock tires were load range E and rated at 3042lbs @ 80psi.  My new tires are load range D, but are rated at 3305lbs @ 65psi.  Maybe the larger size more than offsets the lower load range?  Anyway, I think I'm fine there.  I just wish I knew where to set the pressure for the most even wear, but I'm guessing that isn't an easy answer.  Maybe I'll just have to experiment.  The pressures on the door sticker just shocked me because my '02 Tahoe was only like 30psi.
Posted

I have 265 D BFG's on factory 6-1/2" alloys. 65 in the rear and 59 in the front seems to ride good. Less in the rear the ride gets a little mushy and seems to roll more when cornering. Higher in the front makes ride a little "harder" 50 is way to mushy.

Unless you absolutely max out your payload, D range is only about 100LB/tire max weight rating less than E, depending on manufacturer.

There are several methods for determining the correct surface contact area, but IMHO the ride is the best way to decide what pressure to run. Crowning has not been a problem rotating every 6K. Tires should be at "Normal operating temperature" during evaluation.LOL :cheers:

Posted
If you like the way the MTR's look wait until you put them on dirt or in the mud.  They also have a indestructable sidewall.  The bad thing is they pick up rocks really bad, oh well.  Back to tire pressure, it was suggested to me that you find a flat area (concrete or asphalt) wet it down and with the tires aired to the max drive through the water and see if you have the whole tread on the ground.  Deflate the tire until you have the whole tire pattern on the ground.  My 2001 2500HD, 8.1 allison ended up with 55 in the front and 50 in the back, that was with GY MTR 265's.  The max inflation was 65 psi.  Hope this helps.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...