Anyone likes Geolandar A/T Plus II

points · January 5, 2003

Does anyone like or have Yokohama Geolandar A/T Plus II Tires? Tires Plus here in the Twin Cities have them for cheap... for 90 bucks pre one.

Thanks,

Points

squiddy807 · January 5, 2003

I got 'em. I like them a lot. I can go trail driving with them in the mud with no problems. They're great in the snow and ice. However, I wouldn't reccomend heavy offroading with them, they lack the aggressiveness. They are very quiet on the highway, though. If you want a good all-terrain but do mostly onroad, but the occasional offroad driving. They're great. I've had them for about 25,000 miles now and still love them.

points · January 5, 2003

I've had them for about 25,000 miles now and still love them.

How is the wear on them? I dont want a tire that will only last 30,000 miles. Do you have a pics?

Thanks,

Points

BogeyBoy82 · January 6, 2003

I had these tires on my Grand Cherokee 5.9 Limited before I got my Tahoe. The vehicle was full time 4wd and had like 345 ft. lbs. of torque. But....The Mileage SUCKED!!! I had them for maybe 15,000 miles before they were balder than Bruce Willis. I immediatly bought Michelin LTX AT's afterword and had 30,000 miles on them and looked new when I sold the truck. They are an awesome looking tire and great riding. They offroad very well for what they are. The mileage is terrible but you can buy 2 sets of those before you buy one set of Michelin's. Just my 2 cents.

Z71GUY · January 6, 2003

I have to disagree. I have these tires on my truck as well. I'm pushing 20,000 miles and they still look pretty good. I'm expecting a good bit over 30,000 miles out of them. I dont baby my truck either...not sure someone only got 15,000 out of them...seems a bit strange. Anyways, I love these tires and will buy them again when the time comes. Two thumbs up.

EDIT: If you had the old version of these tires (not the +2) then the mileage did suck bad. This might be why someone only got 15,000 miles. Just make sure they are the newest version (+2's). I think they use a newer rubber compound to get better mileage.

points · January 6, 2003

Well, I'm getting Bridgestone Dueler A/T Revo because its on sale also for 20 bucks more per tire. And I only here good things about them too.

Points

igbig · January 16, 2003

i know this a littel late but i must agree with bogey i had them on my 2000 Z71 and i only got like 25,000 miles out of them. which imo is not acceptable. so your expecting to get 30,000 and are happy with this???? anyway they were great tires. i even pulled my buddys truck out of some pretty nasty muddy crap,which by the way i was in too. in other words i wasnt on dry land pulling him out i was in the same mud hole and they worked great and thats when they were fairly worn. i would have bought them again if they wore a little better . got bfg's now

Z71GUY · January 16, 2003

Well when I said over 30,000, I meant I should see almost 40,000 miles.....considering I paid $85 a tire, I cant complain when the performance has been very good....mud, snow, sand...etc.

woyster_00z71 · January 16, 2003

My friend had a set of the +2's on his '99 'rado. He said they were pretty good but he only got between 20,000 and 25,000 miles out of them before he had to get a new set. I was going to get a set for my '00 but when I checked into them at the tire shop my dad's friend owns, he said they had a tendancy to be out of round and wore out too fast. I went with the Nitto Terra Grappler A/T's and don't regret it one bit. Great tire.

Just my 2 cents.

B.J.