Jump to content

Park, Earnhardt's original driver, fired from DEI

Elwood

By Elwood
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

Elwood Senior Enthusiast

Elwood

Posted
Posted

Park, Earnhardt's original driver, fired from DEI

 

By JENNA FRYER, AP Sports Writer

 

May 6, 2003

 

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) -- Steve Park was fired Tuesday by Dale Earnhardt Inc., ending the tenure of the first full-time Winston Cup driver hired by the late Earnhardt.

 

``Steve was instrumental in DEI's first NASCAR Winston Cup program,'' said Earnhardt's widow, Teresa. ``Our loyalty to each other was hard to overcome. However, the time came where we simply had to make a change.''

 

 

The team hired Jeff Green on an interim basis. He was fired Monday by Richard Childress Racing. Green drove a Busch Series car for Earnhardt in 1995, the first year Earnhardt stopped driving it himself.

 

``We feel Jeff can bring a fresh perspective to this team,'' Teresa Earnhardt said. ``He's worked with our teams in the past and knows that we're dedicated to winning.''

 

Park has had a tumultuous two years since Earnhardt's 2001 death. Six months after Earnhardt was killed in a wreck during the Daytona 500, Park was seriously injured in an accident at Darlington.

 

Park bruised his brain and was sidelined seven months. After he returned to the No. 1 Chevrolet in March 2002, he struggled through poor performances while ignoring speculation he wasn't healthy enough to be back in the car.

 

DEI gave him a one-year contract extension to take him through this season, but there was speculation he wouldn't make it to the end of the deal. After winning the pole two weeks ago at California Speedway, Park blasted his critics.

 

``Amid all the media rumors about me losing my job ... our contract's up at the end of the year,'' he said. ``I guarantee you I plan being in that car until the end of the year.''

 

But he wrecked on the first lap and finished 41st. He also wrecked out of Saturday night's race in Richmond and is 33rd in the standings with just one top-10 finish.

 

Earnhardt put Park in the first Winston Cup car he ever fielded in 1998. He eventually expanded to a three-car operation, hiring son Dale Jr., and Michael Waltrip, and made DEI one of the top teams in NASCAR.

 

When he hired Park, a relatively unknown driver from NASCAR's modified series, Earnhardt bragged that his new protege would win a race before his 15th start in the Busch Series.

 

Park did, leading the final 71 laps at Nashville Speedway and winning in only his 12th start.

 

The victory was the first for DEI in more than three years -- dating to when Earnhardt drove the car himself.

 

Park was the 1997 Busch Series Rookie of the Year for Earnhardt, then made his Winston Cup debut the next season. He ran just 17 events, though, because he was badly injured in a crash.

 

But he came back to give Earnhardt his first win as a Winston Cup car owner with a victory at Watkins Glenn, N.Y., in 2000.

 

Park's only other victory came in 2001 at North Carolina Speedway -- a week after Earnhardt's death.

Elwood Senior Enthusiast

Elwood

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I hate to see Park lose his job, I kinda liked him, but I can see why they did it.  BUT I hate the replecement!!!!!!!  That part really sucks.  I'd rather see Kerry get a shot than see Green driving for DEI.
Kansas Kid Senior Enthusiast

Kansas Kid

Posted
Posted
I always figured that DEI's management had went steadily downhill since Dales death, and this really confirms it.  Why in the #### they fired Park to replace him with Green is beyond me, even if it is just for one race.  Guess this means I won't be buying any DEI merchandise anymore, since Park was my favorite driver.
SilveradoWV Senior Enthusiast

SilveradoWV

Posted
Posted
I didnt like Park at all, he was the worst IMO at DEI at least thats the way it seems. I honestly think that wreck really hurt him and had  an effect he would never be able to overcome therefore hurting his performance week in and week out! The replacement (Green) is probably worse and I do not care for him, but I do like DEI so if he can consistantly finish in the top 15 and win races I will have to live with him being at DEI. Wonder if park will go to RCR?
gave20 Senior Enthusiast

gave20

Posted
Posted
Here's an idea for DEI, make a trade with the 23 team, give them Greene and let Wallace drive the #1 car.  He was the only one who could do anythign with it, except for DW he drove good the few times he was in the cockpit.
JonesNTN Enthusiast

JonesNTN

Posted
Posted
Park should have been gone last year. I honestly believe his poor reflexes are what causes all of his bad luck. I personally would like to see Kurt Busch or Ryan Newman come over to Team Chevy! DEI needs someone a liitle more like Jr., a little less talk and alot more action. So does RCR BTW.
Elwood Senior Enthusiast

Elwood

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I would love to see Kenny get in the car.  That's the first person I thought of for RCr too, but he's finally got a deal with some decent length to it in Cup with another team.

 

As for Newman, I love him, but I like him where he is, since Penske South is one of my 2 favorite teams (DEI the other).

 

I would personally like to see Jamie McMurray run the #1 car if Kenny Wallace can't.  Or a young driver who needs a shot, let him have the rest of the year to get some experience and a chance to impress people.  I think RCR and DEI should both do this.

 

I didnt like Park at all, he was the worst IMO at DEI at least thats the way it seems.

He only has one win less than Waltrip does.  I tend to think he is the least talented of the three, HOWEVER it's not as big of a gap as it's made out to be if you look at the stats.

General Lee 01 Senior Enthusiast

General Lee 01

Posted
Posted

I think Park never has fully recovered from his wreck.

 

His speech is still slower than what it was before the wreck.

 

The only person I blame for Park's lack of performance, is his doctor who cleared him to race last year.

 

With that said.....

 

Since Park has came back, he has 0 wins, 1 or 2 top-5s, and 10(or more) DNFs.

 

I want to see him be successful again just as much as Kyle does. But you can't hide from the truth, and that is, he just wasn't doing good enough.

Elwood Senior Enthusiast

Elwood

Posted
  • Author
Posted
But you can't hide from the truth, and that is, he just wasn't doing good enough.

I agree with that, and I fully understand why they fired him.  I probably would have too, but I wouldn't have replaced him with Green, even temporaily.  Take the opportuniy to put a new face in the car at least for the rest of the year, maybe they'll find a really good young driver that way.

Shadowfax Enthusiast

Shadowfax

Posted
Posted

Well now its been released, Park is the top canidate for the #30 car for RCR. Reports are saying the deal is all but done. Kinda weird too.

 

At the end of the 96 Season Green left DEI when he was driving Dale's BGN car, the driver to replace him was Steve Park. Flash forward to now, and Jeff Green is once more at DEI in Parks ride while it appears now that Park is going to end up in Jeff Greens ride...

 

BTW before his accident, Park was looking more and more like the better of the 3 DEI drivers. His win at the Glen in 2000 carried a momentum over into 2001 where he was consistently running in the top 10 and he was most defintely the better of the DEI drivers until he got hurt. Before he was injured he had the talent and the skill, afterwards though its questionable.. I still root for him though, have since the Busch days. I don't give up on my drivers, never gave up on Neil Bonnett, ain't gonna give up on Park.

 

Guess that means I have to buy AOL gear now.... :):chevy:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 654 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...