Jump to content

NASCAR decision doesn't sit well


Elwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

NASCAR decision to shorten longest race doesn't sit well

 

By JENNA FRYER, AP Sports Writer

 

May 26, 2003

 

 

 

CONCORD, N.C. (AP) -- Ryan Newman stood in the garage, held out his hands and looked skyward. The rain had stopped, which made NASCAR's decision to halt the Coca-Cola 600 even more puzzling.

 

``It looks like it's stopped, and it's a 600-mile race, so it would seem to me we've got some more racing to do,'' Newman said. ``But I don't get to make calls like that so I guess we'll just go home with what we've got.''

 

What Newman got was a fifth-place finish in Sunday night's race, which was stopped after 276 laps and a brief, but heavy rain shower.

 

Jimmie Johnson was declared the winner after NASCAR called the race 186 miles before the finish, giving him a two-race sweep of the showcase events at Lowe's Motor Speedway. He also won The Winston on May 17, picking up a $1 million payday for that victory.

 

No one knows what might have happened had racing resumed.

 

Johnson thinks he was good enough to win -- no matter what.

 

``I don't want to say that we would have won, but we were going to be a contender regardless of what happened,'' Johnson said.

 

Maybe. Maybe not.

 

Perhaps Matt Kenseth would have given Roush Racing its fifth consecutive victory in the longest race of the season, which is considered one of the crown jewels on the NASCAR schedule.

 

Instead, Kenseth was credited with a second-place finish and went home disappointed he didn't get a chance to race for the win.

 

``I sure wish we would have waited it out a little bit and had a shot at it,'' Kenseth said. ``I'm real thankful and real grateful to finish second and to be with such a great race team, but the racer in me still wanted to race.

 

``I think for sure we had one of the three best cars out there and was counting on another 130 laps to try to have a chance at it.''

 

When NASCAR called the race, president Mike Helton said it would take three hours to dry the track. Plus, the weather radar showed more rain on the way.

 

But three hours after the decision, Johnson was still making the celebratory rounds through the corporate suites at Lowe's Motor Speedway and the rain had yet to return.

 

 

``Unfortunately in some deals, Mother Nature wins,'' Helton said. ``We did everything we could.''

 

That was up for debate among the teams.

 

The schedule for the Coca-Cola 600 is one of the more unique ones of the season. Qualifying is on Thursday and Winston Cup teams are not required to be at the race track on Friday, an extremely rare day off.

 

But it rained all day Thursday, and NASCAR sent the teams home with orders to come back Friday for a full work day. Early morning showers delayed the start of on-track activities on Friday, stretching qualifying day even further into the night.

 

So teams were puzzled when the sanctioning body quickly called an end to the actual race.

 

``I can't understand it,'' said Billy Wilburn, crew chief for Rusty Wallace. ``We can spend an extra day to get qualified, but we can't wait another 15 minutes to see if we can get this race in? I feel like I've been cheated.''

 

So did Robbie Reiser, Kenseth's crew chief, who thought they could challenge Johnson over the final stretch of the race.

 

``I'm kind of disappointed in NASCAR because I sat down here all day Friday trying to get these cars qualified in the rain,'' Reiser said. ``And now it isn't even raining and we called the race early. I don't think that's right.''

 

It's the second time this season NASCAR has been criticized for pulling the plug on one of its premier events. The season-opening Daytona 500 ended early, but it rained for almost two hours and showed little signs of letting up when the decision was made.

 

Michael Waltrip won that race, and had no qualms with the decision. He finished sixth on Sunday night and made a point to tell Johnson to enjoy the victory. But like everyone else, Waltrip wanted a chance to finish the race.

 

``I've kind of got the emotion that I'm geared up to run another couple hundred miles, you know?'' Waltrip said. ``I'm all fired up.''

 

In a way, it taints the effort of Johnson and his Hendrick Motorsports crew. He came from last in the field after changing his engine before the race, and his crew got him to the front with speedy work in the pits.

 

They think they would have stayed there, but will never really know.

 

``I'd almost rather go back and finish the race because this opens the win up to scrutiny,'' said crew chief Chad Knaus. ``We think the outcome would have been the same, that our car was only going to get better as the night went on.

 

``But no one will ever believe that.''

Posted

It just seemed like something was influencing Nascars decision other than the rain, because they said a few times it was because the fans and police officers were probably tired or something and I had never heard that exuse before. I mean the fans paid $$$$ to get tickets and I am sure they didnt want it called off. So I have no idea why Nascar stopped it while they did.One time the announcers said something about drivers getting tired which was understandable but the post race interviews showed they werent ready to call it. The announcers showed on radar that it was clearing behind that storm then right after that Nascar said more rain was coming, I wonder how long after it stopped raining it really started again??? Just seems fishy to me to call a race like that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 654 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...