Having a few issues

By Doseman86
January 7, 2018 in Gen III & Gen IV V8 Engines (LS-Based)

Recommended Posts

Doseman86

Posted January 7, 2018

Hey guys new to the group I have a few questions hopefully yall can help me . OK so here we go. I have a 2000 Tahoe with the 5.3 I have been getting intermittent rich codes looked at live data maf looks good on look good can'take figure it out went ahead and swapped maf since it was still under warranty. My mpg is around 9.5 to 10 going around 30-40 miles on a 1/4 tank. Idk I'd this is connected but my temp gauge sits just to the left of 180. Live data showed ect was 140. Can anyone give me any insight on this if these are connected and what I can possibly do. Thanks in advance. Bryan

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Forum Statistics

250.3k
Total Topics

2.7m
Total Posts
Member Statistics

342,711
Total Members

8,960
Most Online

Newest Member
90Nine4One
Joined 15 hours ago
Who's Online 10 Members, 0 Anonymous, 477 Guests (See full list)
- Gone Again
- Donstar
- KARNUT
- PhilB
- MPLSPETE
- bamafan76
- Grumpy Bear
- CamGTP
- newdude
- Diamond817

Latest Articles
Posts
- Joke Thread
  
  By Donstar · Posted 3 minutes ago
- Another 6.2L engine failure!
  
  By Grumpy Bear · Posted 11 minutes ago
  
  I appreciate your sharing that. I would opine that you then hold the same view as the majority. I do note the + behind the 200,000 of the earlier models. I expect this means you would not find it unusual to run across pre-AFM/DFM engines with considerably higher miles which begs the question; at what point would you start to be impressed and say, "Now that's truly exceptional"?
- Gas Prices
  
  By KARNUT · Posted 19 minutes ago
  
  3.51 Kroger’s in Montgomery TX. One of the higher ones.
- Fluid Change Questions
  
  By Core-Lokt · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Thinking on things over the week, I decided to use the remaining oil in the pouch. Basically, there's a gallon in the differential, minus a tiny bit of spillage and whatever remained in the bags. I think Banks designed this cover biased towards the standard Ram fill (some of those applications are greater than others, but by Amsoil's website, capacity is minimum about a pint greater than GM applications. In the picture, the differential appears fairly tilted, but it is really slightly tilted; the camera angle is skewed. With ~8 pints, the level is midway on the sight glass; you can see the center hole of the baffle to more closely judge the level. Regardless the 6.3 pint fill spec, I'm going to leave it as-is. I don't blame Banks for erring on the conservative side, and I don't know why there's such a difference in specs between GM and Ram. And I'd also speculate the cover volume is pretty much the same as the stamped steel, as @Chuck FB noted relative volume with his recollection of another member's fill experience.
- Cab retaining water, common problem areas?
  
  By richard wysong · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  You are probably hearing water in the doors, make sure the drain holes are clear
GM-Trucks.com Clubs
- Black Truck Club
  
  Open Club · 612 members
- White Truck Club
  
  Open Club · 380 members
- Canadian Owners Club
  
  Open Club · 282 members
- Red Truck Club
  
  Open Club · 156 members
- diesel 3.0
  
  Open Club · 279 members
- Texas Owner's Group
  
  Open Club · 371 members
- NorthSky Blue Club
  
  Open Club · 118 members
- Midwest Owner's Group
  
  Open Club · 212 members
- 2015 Custom Sport Club
  
  Open Club · 5 members
- GM Snow Plowing Club HD
  
  Closed Club · 14 members
Popular Contributors
- Week
- Month
- Year
- All Time
1. 1
  
  Grumpy Bear
  17
2. 2
  
  KARNUT
  15
3. 3
  
  Chuck FB
  12
4. 4
  
  diyer2
  11
5. 5
  
  Atlas
  9
Show More