Jump to content

8.1 Power Adder


Recommended Posts

Posted

Any idea what the specs are? I know on the LS1 you can throw some pretty big cams in without reprogramming. If the LSA is simillar between the cams, then it should idle nice. Does it work with stock valve train?

Posted

Comp Cams also has three grinds available for the 8.1.

 

You techincally don't need any re-programming for a cam change unless you're doing something radical. It's is highly recommended though in order to take advantage of the new cam's profile.

Posted

What all goes into making these marine engines so much more powerful. Looking at the GM specs, they have one version that makes 525hp and 560tq, all at the stock 9.1:1 compression ratio. The heads appear to be the same ones on the trucks. Is this all coming from cam and open exhaust?. How can this be?

Posted

GM is offering the HP3 8.1 engine as a crate motor that makes more than 525 horsepower and more than 560 lb-ft of torque. This was announced last year and I haven't really heard much more about it. This is made for automotive applications. I don't see why you couldn't order the parts that are different and have the same engine. Article:8.1 Crate Motor

 

Differences:

Fuel Rail

Throttle Body

Camshaft

Valve Springs

Roller Rocker Arms

Intake/Exhaust Pushrods

Harmonic Balancer

Ignition Coils?

Programming

 

I think this would be a good alternative to supercharging. You could still run on regular octane. I was hoping there might be a kit from GM or the aftermarket to upgrade the regular 8.1. Maybe that was just wishful thinking.

Posted

Quotes from GM "75-millimeter throttle body with an HP3-specific 400 kPa fuel rail, providing a pressure increase of more than 30 percent over the standard Vortec 8100 production engine"

 

Isn' the stock TB 75mm? I know they are on the LS1.

 

"The Vortec HP3's valvetrain system is performance matched throughout, with a high-lift/high-duration camshaft, premium race-style valve springs, 1.7:1 ratio roller rocker arms, dedicated rocker arm studs, and HP3-specific intake and exhaust pushrods"

 

Mmm'kay. That should be less than $1000 for all the hardware.

 

"with its 9.1:1 compression ratio, is designed to run on regular (87 octane) unleaded fuel."

 

To me, that says the heads and pistons are the same as in the truck

 

So let me get this straight. Take a stock 340hp truck motor. Throw in a cam and some better valve train. Raise the fuel pressure, reprogram the computer, and boom.........you gain 180hp!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Holy Chit Mang!!!!!! :D

 

Since the compression is still low, I get the impression that this cam is not that radical. So how the hell can you gain all this power with such minor mods?

Posted

Just some food for thought, the "420hp marine cam" everyone is talking about is the cam GM puts in the Mercury Marine 496 HO motor and the 425hp 8.1L Volvo Penta. They run the factory valvetrain with that motor (stock GM heads, valvesprings, etc..) but they swap the cast crank (in the truck 496) to a forged steel crank.

 

On a positive note though, the factory cast crank can take a lot of power. The steel crank is used due to the sustained high rpm abuse a marine engine gets.

 

The only differences between the Mercury Marine 375hp 496 Mag and 425hp 496 Mag HO are the steel crank in the HO and the bigger camshaft. Of course the computer calibration is adjusted for the HO cam, and the HO runs slightly higher rpm at WOT.

 

I've seen 496 HO's dyno over 440hp and 520tq on a water-brake dyno, at or under 5000rpm.

 

:D

Posted
On a positive note though, the factory cast crank can take a lot of power. The steel crank is used due to the sustained high rpm abuse a marine engine gets.

 

Last I read, GM did away with the steel crank because the cast crank was more than up to the task. I believe they now use the cast crank even in the 520 HP motors.

 

Any idea how the HO cam would idle? I would love to know the specs and compare it to the new cams from Comp Cams.

Posted

So, how do we put all this info together to come up with a plan?

I tried looking up the part # for the cam on the Pace and SDPC parts lookup and they come back "not found."

Posted

The reason for "part not found" is that GM Marine parts are restricted to marine OEMs only. In retrospect marine dealers can't access automotive only parts. As for the HP3 there is a difference in the cylinder heads. The intake and exhaust ports are 100% CNC ported. That and the new cam profile will give you the extra ponies over the old HP2 variant.

 

In our trucks the fuel rail pressure is already set at 400kPA. I use the marine injectors in my truck along with the Whipple blower to get my fuel enrichment for boost. The HP2 fuel injectors was rated at 300kPa and flowed more at 300 than the truck injectors at 400kPA. The HP3 injectors are the same as the HP2 but running at a higher fuel pressure.

 

Don't go nuts over the HP ratings of these marine engines. The 375Hp marine engine is identical internally to the truck engine we have in our trucks. The difference in HP ratings is because GM uses a different test standard for marine vs automotive engines. Using the same automotive test standard for the HP2 420 engine will only give it about a 370 Hp rating. The difference in test standards is basically that the marine standard uses a very low exhaust restriction for the test.

 

Making a cam swap into your new 8.1L truck maybe more of a headache than what the power gains are worth. For one the PCM will not like the cam change. Unless you have a tuning tool like LS1 edit (about $600) or you are willing to take chances with a mail order tuner which is another PITA. Namely because he won't get it right the first time and most likely not the second or the third.

 

The new OBD2 PCMs in our trucks has a myriad of tables. GM spent millions in R&D. They have mapped air flow, fueling and timing curves to a nats a**. Even when Whipple released their 8.1L blower kits way back last year in May or June. They ran into a lot of problems, the kits caused a DTC because the PCM saw more air flow than expected at a given throttle, and RPM. It would throw the engine into reduced power mode which basically means that it would only rev to about 1500 RPMs about enough to get you to the side of the road, that is if you didn't get killed trying to get there off the freeway in lots of traffic. I know this as it happened to me.

 

I was involved with tuning a 8.1 that was installed into a C5 Corvette. It ran fine with the stock cam, but the owner wanted to install that marine cam into the engine which was done. They spent hours and hours tuning it in. In time they got it to run right but it took a lot of time and they had the editing tools to do it with.

 

It would be a nice to drop in a HP3 into a truck. But it would most likely take some considerable tuning before it would run right. It can be done just like anything else all it takes is time and lots of cash. No one really knows what this new HP3 crate motor will cost. But I am in line for it at my buddys dealership. There is no telling when it will be available. The new 572 crate motor introduced over a year ago is still not available.

 

For the gains, one is better off getting a decent exhaust system. And if that isn't enough get a blower. If you guys really want that cam I can get if for you, I know the marine OEM here in Portland, I also explored this installation over a year ago.

Posted

I don't think anyone offers a complete system for the 8.1 trucks. B&B offers a rear sections but no headers. There is a company that makes a set of nice headers, they are called The Other Guys Headers

 

Here is a link to them:

 

The Other Guys Headers

 

I have a set of them in my Suburnban. But here is a word of warning. They told me that they was a drop in fit with "minor welding" meaning it was just to weld the mating peices to the stock exhaust where one would cut off to fit with the new system.

 

Well the pieces that was sent in my kit didn't even come close to mating to the factory tubes. I ended up having to bend a couple new peices and some other fab work to make it all fit. Their explanations was that GM must have used a different exhaust vendor for my production run. Now I know that is pure BS even if GM used a different vendor they sure as heck would be using the same exact templates to manufacture the exhaust piping with!

 

That was my experience otherwise fit and finish is fine as far as looks and the way it fit on the engine. I don't know if anyone else out there had problems like mine. I do know that several people has used them on this forum.

 

My system is a total custom setup. I once used a Magnaflow dual 3" inlet with a single 4" outlet muffler. It was way too loud in my Suburban. I removed it and installed a Banks SS dual 2.75" inlet single 3.5" outlet muffler, the noise level is acceptable and still with an authorative bark as well. I retained but modified my 4" tail pipe. Banks doesn't normally sell just their mufflers but we are a dealer for them and if there is interest I can get them for this mod. It is a drop in fit and an easy installation for any competent exhaust shop that can bend a 3.5" tail pipe. I can also explore the single purchase of just a 3.5" tail pipe from Banks for perhaps a PU or a Suburban that may fit with little or no mods.

 

Here is a picture of the business end of my truck:

 

Suburban 5" exhaust tip

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 437 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...