Jump to content

Off-Roading with Quadrasteer

steppetoe

Recommended Posts

steppetoe Enthusiast

steppetoe

Posted
Posted

:jester: For those who might have wondered, I can report that Quadrasteer works very well off-road, at least it did for me this weekend in NH.

 

Plenty of abuse, mud (well, as much as a stock truck on highway tires can handle), climbing, very tight trails, etc, etc. Yes, I was careful about backing over anything that might have made contact with that tie rod, but other than that there were no worries. Comparing it to my non-Quadrasteer 98 K1500 I can tell you that having the rear wheels steering is a huge benefit on narrow trails with lots of sharp curves. Particulary when I had to back up along this tight winding trail for several hundred yards because I ran out of road and there was zero turn-around space.

Shaners Senior Enthusiast

Shaners

Posted
Posted

I would think Quadrasteer would be ideal for tight trails. I would be very cautious of all those components under the rear of the truck though...

Mega Dogmeat Enthusiast

Mega Dogmeat

Posted
Posted

well, heck, think about it ... the back end is basically just a Dana 60 ... which we all know can be built up to be very strong. The question is, *IS* the D60 these trucks built that way? :jester:

 

If it is, I would take a real serious look at getting a quadrasteer truck for my next pickup ....

Wingnut Senior Enthusiast

Wingnut

Posted
Posted

I would look at getting a quadrasteer sytem at salvage, and slapping it under a shortwide :jester:

 

Now THAT would be a tight turn!

steppetoe Enthusiast

steppetoe

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I would think Quadrasteer would be ideal for tight trails. I would be very cautious of all those components under the rear of the truck though...

Of all the hardware under there, most of it appears to be very strong. The only thing I think you have to be careful about is the thing that I think is a tie rod. It appears quite vulnerable. The rest of it looks quite serious. I do remember reading that the whole thing was built a little stronger than it had to be. I was hammering on the truck pretty good I might add.

Mega Dogmeat Enthusiast

Mega Dogmeat

Posted
Posted
I would look at getting a quadrasteer sytem at salvage, and slapping it under a shortwide :cool:

 

Now THAT would be a tight turn!

I think that'd be easier said than done ... Quadrasteer is all computer controlled, so it's all dialed in for exactly what length truck you have, etc ...

 

I would think that putting it on a shorter wheelbase than it was intended for with no way to reprogram it might be a good way to roll your truck when passing somone on the highway :jester:

 

 

I mean it probably wouldn't be that bad like that, but it'd definatley need to be "re-tuned" if you were gonna put it on a shortbed truck I'd think ....

 

But it sure is a hell of an idea ;)

 

make for one hell of a trail rig :seeya:

Wingnut Senior Enthusiast

Wingnut

Posted
Posted
I think that'd be easier said than done ... Quadrasteer is all computer controlled, so it's all dialed in for exactly what length truck you have, etc ...

 

I would think that putting it on a shorter wheelbase than it was intended for with no way to reprogram it might be a good way to roll your truck when passing somone on the highway :jester:

 

 

I mean it probably wouldn't be that bad like that, but it'd definatley need to be "re-tuned" if you were gonna put it on a shortbed truck I'd think ....

 

But it sure is a hell of an idea ;)

 

make for one hell of a trail rig :seeya:

Nah, if you're going to dream....Dream big.

 

When you take the quadrasteer system, you also take the 'puter, and the 6.0 liter. :cool:

 

Wheelbase probably wouldn't be a factor in which direction (or when) the rear wheels turn, only in how far. The shorter wheelbase would probably enhance the effect...Would probably take about 13 minutes to get used to.

 

But yeah....Heck of a trail rig.

Mega Dogmeat Enthusiast

Mega Dogmeat

Posted
Posted

threads like these always get me thinking that I wish there was a forum called "Ask a GM Engineer Dot Com" or whatever so we could get answers from the guys who actually designed these things :rotfl:

Wingnut Senior Enthusiast

Wingnut

Posted
Posted
threads like these always get me thinking that I wish there was a forum called "Ask a GM Engineer Dot Com" or whatever so we could get answers from the guys who actually designed these things :rotfl:

Nah, that would be above and beyond the current high-standards of customer service. :jester:

chevy4x4trucks Senior Enthusiast

chevy4x4trucks

Posted
Posted

To protect it for offroading would it be possible to weld some steel tubes together to make a cage for all the components? I'm surprised that a company hasn't offered such a product already considering they make protection plates for the rear axle anyways. Seems like a logical step to me.

Dave J Enthusiast

Dave J

Posted
Posted

well the steering motor/diff does have about an 1/8 thick lil skid plate under it but those tie rods like the front end, are very exposed and could be bent. having Q-steer myself, I would have thought they might have made the tie rods more like 5/8'' or better! they are not! they are at 17/32" My ONLY compliant of my truck?? has heated leather seats! and the switch for that is too close to driverside window button!! so it inadvertanyly gets drvr side seat turned on and gets hot before one realizes its on!! :jester:

chevy4x4trucks Senior Enthusiast

chevy4x4trucks

Posted
Posted
has heated leather seats! and the switch for that is too close to driverside window button!! so it inadvertanyly gets drvr side seat turned on and gets hot before one realizes its on!! :jester:

Done that numerous times :seeya:

Wingnut Senior Enthusiast

Wingnut

Posted
Posted

Yup, me too.

 

Nothing like it being 102 degrees out, and thinking your AC is on the fritz because you are sweating like a pig, then realizing that your keester heater is on. :jester:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Zane
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By Zane · Posted

      It's official. Chevy pulled the covers off the next-gen 2027 Silverado 1500, and we got the first official look.   Full breakdown here: https://www.gm-trucks.com/2027-chevrolet-silverado-official-first-look-specs/   The quick hits: LT is dead. The new core trim is just called "Silverado." Two new V8s, a 5.7L and a 6.6L. No horsepower or torque numbers yet. The 2.7 TurboMax finally gets the 10-speed. ZR2 moves to standard 35s with front and rear lockers. Over 60 inches of dash display on ZR2 and High Country, passenger screen included. Seven trims, three lifted from the factory: ZR2, Trail Boss, and a new Custom Trail Boss.   So let's get into it: 5.7 and 6.6 instead of holding out for a 6.7. Right call? Killing the LT name after all these years: bold, or a mistake? Does the new look land for you, or is it too safe? No power numbers at reveal. Smart tease, or frustrating? What are you ordering on day one?   Drop your first impressions below. 
    • RyanbabZ71
      Gas Prices

      By RyanbabZ71 · Posted

      LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • No F-bdy Bs
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By No F-bdy Bs · Posted

      Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...