Jump to content

Flowmasters???


Recommended Posts

Posted

you will probably gain up to 10hp if you go with just a muffler and not a cat-back system. There's a lot of guys on here that like Flowmaster. I personally don't. The 40 series is their loudest one, so if you are ok with quite a bit of interior resonance in the cab, then you will like it. It sounds good outside the vehicle, but makes the cab a lot louder as well. There's also Magnaflow, Dynomax, Borla, Gibson, and some others you should consider. A lot of guys on here like Magnaflow. I'm doing my truck this week. Going with a Magnaflow, or a Gibson. Haven't decided yet. Good luck with whatever you get, but I would ask your muffler shop their opinions on what you plan to get. Tell them what you are really after, and if they are honest, they'll tell you if the 40 series is the right one for you. :fume:

Posted

I have the FM 40 (non-deltaflow version) on my ZR2 and it is true that you will have more interior resonance. Any power gains will probably not be very noticeable, depending on whether you also have an aftermarket, free-flowing intake system, and on the size and type of pipes used after the muffler. You'll probably love the sound of the FM 40, though (at least from the outside)!

 

Good luck!

Posted

On my '96 I have a fm 40, I had the guy at the muffler shop combine my 'dual 2.25's into one 3" after the cats and turn it down right after the muffler, it exits just befor my rear end under the truck. Sounds awesome I don't think the ineterior noise is too bad, but hell over the super swampers and the stereo who can really tell. I also noticed a significant difference in performance. :fume::thumbs:

Posted

FM 40's here too (non-DeltaFlow as well). I *LOVE* the sound and with mine exiting at the rear, it's not too loud in the cab. Don't get me wrong, you can definitely hear it (which I wanted to), but you can still carry on a conversation, etc just as you would before. While I'm sure there were a few ponies freed up by the exhaust, it wasn't anything you could really feel in the seat of your pants, but I have gotten numerous compliments on how good it sounds! :fume:

Posted

Don't brush aside those manufacturers that lack massive advertising budgets... I went with Goerlichs Xcelerator muffler and twins out the sides and couldn't be happier with my choice, awesome product, this after considering my experience with Gibsons on two trucks and laughing the price of Borlas and Corsas out of the picture. Good luck.

Posted

i have the "50"series,so its a "Bit"quieter(at least that what they told me :confused: ).it rumbles so nice.people often ask me what type of muffler they are.and asked how do they sound inside(if its intrusive).it sounds soooo mellow,buts thats just me(IMHO) :cheers: .but i can still hear people talking and i still play the radio.but you cant hear it at crusing speed (like on a highway)Only at innitial take off or going up a hill,grade or entrance ramp

Posted

I have had flowmaster 1chambers,2 chambers,3chambers,magnaflows and I have finally found the product that satisfies me,I just got 2 Borla XR1 sportsman 12 inch mufflers and I love the sound of them.They have the Borla tone like on the Z28's with a closed plate.I have wanted this sound forever and now I finally got them and will stay with Borla.I liked my magnaflows I had much better than the flowmasters but I like the Borla better than the maganflows.Its the tone they have that I love to hear.Its hard to explain what they sound like without a soundclip or acually being next to my truck.

Posted

A guy in town dynoed his 8.1 and then put a flowmaster 40 on it and dynoed it again and it showed zero results. I forget the results, its been awhile, all I remember is laughing at the guy cuz he was certian he got 20 hp cuz he could "feel it in his seat". :confused:

 

You guys should know that a muffler isn't going to gain you hp because the cat(s) is/are the most restrictive point in the exhaust, so if you free up the exhaust behind the cat, the motor to the cat(s) is/are still going to have the same environment.

 

Get a high flow cat(s) or remove the cat(s) for good and Then you will really see some gains.

Posted

I put a 40 series in place of the stock muffler. I still have the same pipes all around and same side exit. The big resonance inside the cab is around 1800-2100 rpm, usually just before shift on strong accelerations. At first this was annoying because this was the only time you heard it, and it was pretty loud. Seemed like too much contrast. But now I have either gotten used to it and really like it, or it took some breaking in time and smoothed out the difference.

 

Either way, I would talk to your muffler man. I told mine I had a cherry bomb glasspack and a y-pipe on my '94 and that was too loud for this truck. Don't expect to "feel" the performance gains. I haven't noticed any more miles per gallon, either. Do it for the purr, it does sound really nice outside the truck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...