Jump to content

383 Stroker Longblock for under $2000!?


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I bought one of there 383 TBI engines for my C1500 and it has a lot of torque but no upper end horsepower. It comes with a little cam size of 184/194 @.050 duration. They told me it would with the big 206/214 cam but it didn't. I get 21 mpg with it on the highway which is nice but the upper end hp is not there but the low end torque is there. So, if I was you and you wanted low end torque, I would get there engine but you have to be very detailed what you want the engine to have. Secondly, I would buy the 383 long block from GM, wish I would have done that and just change out the cam to make it work with the TBI system. Good luck...hope this helps.

Posted

That was my little brother that bought the 383 from them. We found out that the cam was wrong when they sent us the cam spec sheet. They were all out of the cam that was suppose to go in there so instead of telling us, they just sent that one instead. He was going off to college on a baseball scholarship soon and we didn't have time to wait and deal with their sorry behinds. They did not have a quick fix and if I remember correctly, wanted us to send the engine back to them (with us paying the freight) for them to install the correct cam after a month or so of them waiting to get the right cam which was suppose to be in the engine to begin with. If that ever happened to me, I'd be filling up my tank of gas to deliver the engine to them personally if you know what I mean. However, I agree with him though, great low end torque, but no upper end. You can feel the engine just die when it starts getting up in the range. In your shoes, I'd buy the 383 short block from GM, put in the cam you want. Pop on a set of vortech or AFR heads with the matching intake for each application. And then put the Whipple supercharger on top :lol:

Posted

I just ordered from them two days ago. :lol: It's for my 97', so it's a vortec. I mention to him about your brother not getting the right cam. I had him write everything in an email that would be going in it, direct copy of what is on the website. How long ago was this? And is the engine still running good? Thanks.

Posted

On the bright side, my brother is getting crazy gas mileage with it. I think he is getting 22mpg or close to it on the hwy. It is holding up pretty good I guess, but I don't think he is really happy with it. With all of the money he put in to the engine to get it going and running (our other engine had around 230,000 miles on it so we had to buy alot of new parts and accessories) he could have bought the ram jet 350 from chevrolet and got it running. For the money its hard to beat the engine. We have had no durability problems as of now (that I know of). I think Raynor is going to try an LS-1 build up next time. The thought of a 427 small block is eating him alive right now.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Sorry I haven't been on this thing in a while. The engine is fine....the piston slap is a little noisy but i found that the Mobil 1 5w40 Synblend is the best stuff to cover it up. Durability, they use low tendency piston rings which sometimes eats up some oil. I am getting 21.5 mpg with it on the hwy and 15 to 16 in the city. I love the gas mileage of being a college student but as soon as I graduate the engine will be replaced. Very disappointed in the performance of the engine but it gets great gas mileage on the highway. If you want even more power, a set of 1.6 Roller Rockers will give you about 15 more hp. Good luck with the engine.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 415 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...