Jump to content

2004 GMC Sierra 5.3L: P0171&P0174


GMCSierra04

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I have a 04 gmc sierra with the 5.3l v8 and 12,049 miles. I just got a new diagnostic program and hooked it up and P0171(bank 1 too lean) and P0174(bank 2 too lean). The truck also has a stumble at idle which has gotten more noticable lately and a slow return to idle when switching back from drive to reverse(when parking...). What should I begin to start looking for, contaminated MAF and vacuum leaks? I tried to pull up the BARO PID in Hz but would only read in KPA's. I wanted to compare it to the barometric pressure at basically sea level(155Hz+/-) and see if the MAF was suspect. STFT bank 1&2 at idle were staying right at 0 and LTFT's 1 & 2 were about 9-11%. O2 B1S1&B1S2 were switching as they should be but when I would hold the RPM's @ 1,200 and let off, the truck's rpm would dip to 450 and both O2's would flatline lean for a few seconds. Not 100% sure if this is normal with GM's but thought I would add it in anyways. All the air intake tubes are connected and in the proper places and there are no obvious problems. Have you seen similar things like this at the dealership? I really do appreciate all the help you and everyone else gives!!!

 

Thanks,

Zack

Posted

Start off troubleshooting with the simple checks - they often are the problem...

 

Running lean indicates that you engine is not getting enough gas. I believe the 2004s still have a replaceable fuel filter mounted on the drivers side frame rail. (The 2005s just have a screen at the fuel pump inside the tank) You could have gotten some bad gas. Have you removed the filter and seen if it is plugged?

 

This is a good place to start and an easy fix if it is the problem.

Posted

I would start with making sure fuel pressure was right at spec. Then I'd be looking for unmetered air entering somewhere. Seems unlikely that an '04 with only 12k miles on it would have an intake leak, but anything is possible.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,972
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Whit.the.COB
    Newest Member
    Whit.the.COB
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 602 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Even tougher is the 5.0 / 302. That's what this one has.    https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   https://postimg.cc/4n3F3yzY   Just realized I had the airbox removed in the engine pic, lol.
    • Yep! This should be a pin somewhere as @pgamboa really dives into all of this. Thanks for reposting the link!
    • I did the new thermostat after doing a 'flip' for a year. Runs as cool one way as the other in the summer but in the winter there is a bit of a floor. Yellow with the new 70 C thermostat. My data over the life of the unit to date. Still need more cooler. Anyway that floor helped both winter fuel economy and shift quality in the winter. I found it a good balance.       
    • Evan Williams Bottled in Bond   So pouring the last of a bottle of Evan Williams Black label last night I set off the the state store for a refill only to be denied the by an empty shelf. Rats.    What the did have was a bottle of Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. 100 proof. Hum, a few bucks more but a known distiller. Lets have a swing at it. ( I have before )    Cracked it open and pour a serving over ice. Hum.... more heat, yes. More alcohol naturally. But the barreling not the proof brings the taste and this one came up short.    Oh is was familiar but the heat ran the barrel over like a Peterbilt runs over a squirrel. Could use a heavier toasting of the oak me thinks or perhaps a longer barreling. Who knows. But what I can say is ice or a water back isn't the answer. What kills one kills them both. Sad. It is a pleasant drink....if you have little to compare it to.  
    • I've had exactly one set of Bridgestone. Lasted five year and 125,000 miles and had I known better 15oK would have been a cake walk. I would have bought a like set had they not tripled in price since the first set. I removed them at said mileage with 5/32" remaining in dead even wear all four. They were fuel efficient, quite, comfortable and predictable.    Early on I got a very good alignment checked at least once a year, sometimes twice; kept the tires properly inflated, balanced and rotated. And I've found that many a tire issue can be avoided with great maintenance practices. Lot's of tire dealers will do rotation and balance (simple) for free for as long as you own the tire they sold you so no excuse not to.    Bead prep, alloy integrity and stem health have a huge impact on inflation stability. There are more mountings done poorly that perfectly. Finding a good tire guy is gold and as important as finding a tire you like.    That 3X price increase now two sets of "other tires' later is starting look like a bargain.      Bad maintenance kills more tires than bad tires. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...