Jump to content

Solid Front Axle Conversion


Recommended Posts

Posted

My buddy is taking the plunge and is junking all the front end set-up on his '05 Dmax for a solid axle conversion and leaf packs. Going with a Dana 70 w/ ARB up front. Now, i have a trailbuggy Jeep for Rubicon wheeling, but to take the blue torch to a new truck seems crazy. Its his $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and wants to build a more capable off-highway truck. Sure, solid front axle/leaf packs are IMO better that torsion or coils, but WTF??? I'd have a coronary chopping out all the OEM front end, ESPECIALLY on a daily driver.

 

Admittedly, it seems like a cool modification and the solid front axle will undoubtedly enhance off-highway performance, but there is a WTF?? factor i'm struggling with... So, anyone out there in 2500/3500 land seen a conversion like this on a NEW rig?

 

just wondering if i'm crazy to ask or it there are more out there with the same mod...

 

mb

Posted

i wouldnt go with leaf packs if i were him, id stick with some coils with a 5 link set up like the dodge rams, those front ends are real solid, i agree the live axle is better for offroading but i mean the ifs isnt that bad... anyways here is a link where they did it on a 2500 suburban http://www.fourwheeler.com/techarticles/55398/

 

and off road unlimited site

 

http://www.offroadunlimited.com/store/index.php?cPath=77

Posted

There's a bunch of guys on fullsizechevy.com and pirate4x4.com that do this to newer rigs. They all say parts alone costs around 9k.

 

No thank you for me! I'll just wait to see if the rumors about a SFA in the 07 HD's ever comes true.

Posted

Pretty stupid IMO. Unless hes going to do some hardcore wheelin' the IFS will work just fine. That brings us to another point,if hes going to do some serious wheelin',why would he be doing it in a big ass diesel P/U?

 

 

I guess some guys have more money than brains.

Posted
Pretty stupid IMO. Unless hes going to do some hardcore wheelin' the IFS will work just fine. That brings us to another point,if hes going to do some serious wheelin',why would he be doing it in a big ass diesel P/U?

 

 

I guess some guys have more money than brains.

 

 

 

 

 

i agree to a certain extent, i know the dodge ram i used to have (2003 2500) was a very capable rig due to the front end build.. everyitng from steering to the links, i would feel much more safe in a dodge with a solid front than an IFS, We did a lot with the dodge as far as hauling things offroad that a smaller truck wouldnt be able to do and it go the job done with minimal effort...Its just a preference thing i guess, the GM has a MUCH nicer interior than the Dodge or the Ford especially, this i like, but i mean the IFS is a little loose for me in offroad situations.. tho its a charm on the streets. If i was in his position i would have picked up a dodge 2500 cc LB or that new megacab, very capable trucks, .. their transmissions still suck though

Posted
Pretty stupid IMO. Unless hes going to do some hardcore wheelin' the IFS will work just fine. That brings us to another point,if hes going to do some serious wheelin',why would he be doing it in a big ass diesel P/U?

 

 

I guess some guys have more money than brains.

 

 

 

 

 

i agree to a certain extent, i know the dodge ram i used to have (2003 2500) was a very capable rig due to the front end build.. everyitng from steering to the links, i would feel much more safe in a dodge with a solid front than an IFS, We did a lot with the dodge as far as hauling things offroad that a smaller truck wouldnt be able to do and it go the job done with minimal effort...Its just a preference thing i guess, the GM has a MUCH nicer interior than the Dodge or the Ford especially, this i like, but i mean the IFS is a little loose for me in offroad situations.. tho its a charm on the streets. If i was in his position i would have picked up a dodge 2500 cc LB or that new megacab, very capable trucks, .. their transmissions still suck though

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have a an x-cab short bed 2500HD,its not nearly the perfect off road rig,but its also pretty capable. I don't have the need for two trucks or a dedicated off road machine,so I use what I have. This guy seems like hes wasting a bunch of money to make his truck into an off road warior,when it will NEVER be as capable as a CJ,landcruiser or such. He could spend the 9-10 grand it'll cost for the conversion and build a sweet rig that'll do things his bigger truck never will.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,222 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...