Jump to content

6.5TD's?

Kansas Kid

Recommended Posts

jet mech New Member

jet mech

Posted
Posted

Hi to all,

My '92 chevy K1500, 350ci,xtra cab,short bed has been one of the most dependable,best running vehicles I've ever owned(131,000 mi. and counting). As good as it has been, it's time to think of getting something a bit newer. We pull a 25ft. 5th wheeler(6500gvw) with this truck but to be honest its right at its upper limit of what it is rated to tow. Looks like a 3/4 ton is in my future. I'd really like to stay with Chevy and would like to go to a diesel. Dura-max is to way pricey for me right now. That leaves trying to find as new a 6.5TD as possible. I've read about the troubles that early years of the 6.5 have had with the injection pumps and block cracking/cooling  problems. My question to all is -- by '98 to '00 were most of the problems solved?? I know that with the '98+ 8600 gvw trucks you got the L65 430 ft # torque engine. How do these engines compare to the other diesels on the market as far as trouble free operation. Anything I should look out for while hunting for my next truck??

Anyone out there who has or had one of these'98 to'00 trucks that wants to tell how good or bad these engines are, I'll be all ears. Thanks for a great forum and web site.

Suburbanite Enthusiast

Suburbanite

Posted
Posted

I think you'd be better off posting your question on a diesel-specific website. The only one I can recall off-hand is: gm-diesel.com , but there are others.

 

AFAIK the last change to the 6.5TD was made in '97, higher capacity water pump & ???, so anything newer than that should be ok.

 

As for dependability, IMO the pre-24 valve Cummins is easily the winner in that category. Next is the 6.5TD & lastly the PSD.

 

FWIW, from what I've read, the 6.5TD is quite limited in its abilitly to be 'hopped' up. OTOH, the Cummins & PSD can make mind-boggling power with the right mods.

 

I don't know how you feel about noise but the 6.5TD is the 'quietest' of the diesels & it's definitely not quiet, as I can attest to, since I own a '95. The Cummins is the noisiest.

 

I'd hold out for the Duramax.

Greg Senior Enthusiast

Greg

Posted
Posted

I would consider most 6.5s to be projects rather than truly reliable transports.  If you want to stick with Chevy, try looking for a pre-99 (old body style) C/K 2500 with a gas engine - 350 or 454.  If you're towing about a 6500 lb. 5er, a gas 3/4 ton should do the job nicely.  If you think you'll also be buying a larger 5er in the near future (8-10K lbs) you'll need to go to 1 ton.

Kansas Kid Senior Enthusiast

Kansas Kid

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think as long as you don't expect the 6.5TD to have near the power of a Duramax, Cummins, or PSD you will probably fairly pleased with how well it pulls compared to your current truck.  Not only with how the truck handles the load, but the 6.5 will pull better then a 350.  Whatever you do though, make sure you go atleast 98 and newer trucks because by that time they had solved all the injection pump (the major cause of failure on these motors) and the overheating problems.

 

As for the changes, in 97 they went to a larger water pump, dual thermostates, and the pistons recieve oil cooling jets on the bottom side.  The oil capacity of the 6.5 was increased in the 1999 model year to 8 quarts. Up from 7 quarts used in all earlier models.   The 1999 model C/K trucks are being equipped with the  MT800 cooling system originally intended for the new Silverado body style trucks. The added cooling provided by a 21" 9-blade composite fan and enhanced water pump allows for a stock power increase to 215 hp and 430 lb-ft. The '99 model engine uses the same hi-capacity engine oil cooling system incorporated in the 1997 model year. This increase in oil pump capacity is being used to increase oil cooler flow rates of 100% and allow additional flow volume to feed the piston oil spray nozzles.

 

New for 1999 is a 3000 rpm governed limit and an exhaust pressure regulator system designed to reduce white smoke on a cold start. Also, beginning in 1999, the catalytic converter was removed without affecting the emissions certification.

 

For anything else, I would highly suggest checking out

 

http://www.62-65-dieselpage.com

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,276 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Joke Thread

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

    • Grumpy Bear
      The Peckish Synapse

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      The Peckish Synapse

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • richard wysong
      Electrical Problem - solved

      By richard wysong · Posted

      Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...