Jump to content

Marlin takes UAW-GM 500


Elwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

The race was alright. I wish Mike Wallace would've stayed in it but I guess it just wasn't meant to be.

 

 

 

What the hell is that thing that the NASCAR officials put around the window as Marlin got out of the car in victory Lane?

Posted

I noticed that "frame thingy", too. The only thing that I could come up with is that it gives the driver something to hold on to when he stands on the window sill.

Did you see his crewman kiss the baby when he was running across the grass?

He needed a HANS device!

Posted

Now that I think about it they used it last week too.

 

I think it has to do w/ NASCAR wanting to stop the drivers from climbing, and jumping up and down  on the roofs of the cars in Victory circle.

 

If it's not for that, or the reason you stated Friz, then I don't know whst it's for.

Posted

I had to listen to the last 100 or so laps on the radio.  They said he couldn't make his victory lap, but didn't say why.  Anbody know why?

Posted

Quote from Elwood, posted on Oct. 07 2001,7:23

I had to listen to the last 100 or so laps on the radio.  They said he couldn't make his victory lap, but didn't say why.  Anbody know why?

 

NASCAR didn't let him do it for some reason.

 

It might be because he pulled up to the S\F line to get the flag and about 30 ppl crowded around the car before he could get going.

Posted

I wondered who won the race, I was sitting in the combine cab from 9am til 5pm today so I didn't get to watch any of the race and the AM station that carries the races had war talk on, so I was left clueless.

 

See General, what did I tell you a few months ago.  Give Dodge some time and they will be competitive in this racing.  They starting racing these Dodge motors and cars too soon, they should have waited another year for the intro so that they would have been done with all their testing and stuff instead of doing it through the season.  

 

That frame deal is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.  Takes away the best thing a winner can do in his post race celebration.  I also don't know of any cars failing post race inspection because the driver jumped on the roof too hard and screwed it up.

Posted

Quote from Jpshostr, posted on Oct. 08 2001,00:50

That frame deal is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.  Takes away the best thing a winner can do in his post race celebration.  I also don't know of any cars failing post race inspection because the driver jumped on the roof too hard and screwed it up.

 

Mayfield was penalized either last year or the year before for jumping on the roof.  It didn't meet the height requirement for NASCAR and they said it may have been too low and the team knew it, so jumping on the roof would be a good excuse.  Kind of a cheap penalty from NASCAR if you ask me.  If it was good for NASCAR before the race, I don't see how the team could change it during the race.  I think the inspector in the pits would see the crew knocking it down during a pit stop.  But you never know.

 

I think that frame thing is stipid too.  Cheap looking.  Just tell the drivers if they jump on the roof, they will be penalized "X" amount of points.  Something substantial too, like 200 points, not 25.  I think that would keep drivers off the roof seeing that the points are very precious.  

Posted

Oh yeah did anybody hear Tony Stewart whining??  He basically said he would have won if Dodge didn't have too many aero advantages.  Nascar gives them too much and the pontiacs can't keep up.  That ticked me off.

Posted

I knew that NASCAR was the perfect place for Dodges... both engines and trans last about 400-500 miles on their street cars before blowing up, so getting them to go the distance on the track would be simple.

 

And to boost MiniVan Sales, I think next year they'll race the Caravan...

 

caravan_nascar.jpg

Posted

Quote from avant1963, posted on Oct. 08 2001,6:52

And to boost MiniVan Sales, I think next year they'll race the Caravan...

 

caravan_nascar.jpg

 

I'm waiting for them to announce a "Nascar Mini-van series" anytime now.

Posted

Quote from Elwood, posted on Oct. 08 2001,07:25

Oh yeah did anybody hear Tony Stewart whining??  He basically said he would have won if Dodge didn't have too many aero advantages.  Nascar gives them too much and the pontiacs can't keep up.  That ticked me off.

 

Must be his open wheel roots showing up.  When you flat get your butt kicked, whine that you were at a disadvantage.  If it isn't the tires it is the Pontiac body.

Posted

Fat-Boyardee whining? Nahh...

Gotta admit though. He's a loose cannon.

 

He called Goodyear tires "junk." That caused a strain since goodyear sponsors team to the tune of about $600K yearly.

 

Liked what Gibbs said though. He said he doesn't worry about his driver getting in trouble on the track. He said what he worries about is a driver getting into trouble off the track. And Tony doesn't do that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...