Jump to content

Silverado, Ram, F-150 And Tundra Comparison


Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't really agree with their end conclusion. I think the Chev was short-changed. Come on, it had the (and I will list):

 

--Most horsepower

--Lightest weight

--Fastest 0-60 mph time

--Fastest slalom time

--Shortest stopping distance

--2nd place finish towing uphill by only 4 seconds (out of 13 minutes)

--Best fuel economy!

--6 speed which they seemed to like

 

Apparently, they failed it cause:

 

--Think the dash is "monochromatic" and "dreary" (are you kidding me!! Did they even look at the ugliness of the tundra or f-150 dashes?)

--Integrated Ipod control (boo hoo, who cares?)

 

1) Doesn't have extendable tow mirrors

2) Rearview Camera

3) Rear seat entertainment

4) Rear slide window has to be an "extra option"

5) Doesn't have side curtain airbags

 

All of the above items 1-5 can be ordered if i'm not mistaken...why didn't they get a unit with those options if it was SO important to them!? What a bunch of hoey!

Posted

Don't agree... Thats my opinion.... I'd give the dodge a close second... but still not no. 1

Posted
I don't really agree with their end conclusion. I think the Chev was short-changed. Come on, it had the (and I will list):

 

--Most horsepower

--Lightest weight

--Fastest 0-60 mph time

--Fastest slalom time

--Shortest stopping distance

--2nd place finish towing uphill by only 4 seconds (out of 13 minutes)

--Best fuel economy!

--6 speed which they seemed to like

 

Apparently, they failed it cause:

 

--Think the dash is "monochromatic" and "dreary" (are you kidding me!! Did they even look at the ugliness of the tundra or f-150 dashes?)

--Integrated Ipod control (boo hoo, who cares?)

 

1) Doesn't have extendable tow mirrors

2) Rearview Camera

3) Rear seat entertainment

4) Rear slide window has to be an "extra option"

5) Doesn't have side curtain airbags

 

All of the above items 1-5 can be ordered if i'm not mistaken...why didn't they get a unit with those options if it was SO important to them!? What a bunch of hoey!

 

well actually it was third

 

And the Dodge does better over the long haul up the long grade, where the horsepower and the axle ratio come into play. It clears the top in a virtual tie with the Tundra (12 minutes, 51 seconds)
Posted

I'd like to know how they got the stock truck to spin the tires like they did... Power brake maybe with stabltrak and traction control off :nonod:

 

Not to shabby of a burn out on the one video.

Posted

I agree with 2005LT, the Chevy SHOULD have gotten at least 2nd place. The test should be about PERFORMANCE only, not the color of the interior, or the size of the radio buttons...

 

I mean come on, when I first heard on the video that the Silverado failed because of a "dreary" interior (Correct me, but doesn't the LTZ come in 5 or so interiors???) and that the buttons where "to small" made it take 3rd place, I about had a heart attack. I think that Edmunds.com video is subjective. In their Sierra Denali video, they also complained that a sliding rear window should come "standard".

 

It should have been, according to the tests:

 

#4 - F-10

#3 - Tundra

#2 - Silverado

#1 - Ram

Posted
why 2nd? First one! for Silverados....

if not why did you buy it?

 

 

I, personally, would rate the Silverado as #1. Why? Because I like GM, and GM is the only mfg. I would buy a vehicle from. And I would take a Silverado over a Ram any day.

 

But, by saying that the Ram be 1, and Silvy be 2, I referring to the video. According to the tests that they performed, and their own personality of judgement, the Silverado should have been #2.

Posted

6.6 0-60 and 14.0 in the quarter isn't bad for a CrewCab 4x4.

 

The article is typical limpwristed "CAR GUY" slanted writer spleege. I get so tired of TRUCKS getting judged bu their car-like ride and handling. I prefer my truck to be a TRUCK. Who cares what their so called results are?

 

I think they should all go back to their day jobs over at Prius Weekly.

Posted

@ the end of the article:

"And if you're not going to tow or haul, why buy a truck at this point?"

 

haha If I could drive a Mack Truck, and do all my daily things, I maybe go in a Mack hahaa, I like the big cars, whith a big chassis, and a big engine.. (I don't tow or haul)...

Posted
@ the end of the article:

"And if you're not going to tow or haul, why buy a truck at this point?"

 

haha If I could drive a Mack Truck, and do all my daily things, I maybe go in a Mack hahaa, I like the big cars, whith a big chassis, and a big engine.. (I don't tow or haul)...

 

I'll second that.

Posted

After reading this article I would have to agree with Edmunds. This is by far the best comparsion I have seen. I drove all these trucks back in February and they are all good trucks. However, the Dodge is a nice mean looking truck but I knew if I bought it I would never be able to get out of it if I were to sell it. The Ford is...dated and I am not sure why anyone would buy it. The Tundra is a damn good truck. It is solid and runs hard. You feel like your in a tough truck with the way that it rides. The truck does not get the best mileage but and the dash on the truck is not very well layed out. The Chevy/GMC gets better mileage but the suspension is a bit sloppy IMO and the truck has its fair share of rattles when compared to the Toyota.

 

I chose the Chevy because it was the truck that had the best return on investment and had better fuel mileage and a better 4x4 system than the other three. However I feel the truck interior needs some work to eliminate rattles and the suspension needs to be stiffened up a bit.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 409 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...