Jump to content

New Format for THE WINSTON


Elwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

New format turns The Winston into fight for survival

 

By JENNA FRYER

AP Sports Writer

April 10, 2002

 

 

CONCORD, N.C. (AP) -- A record purse, 20 more laps and a fight for survival are among the new wrinkles in The Winston, NASCAR's annual all-star event.

 

Under the format announced Wednesday, the cars at the back of the field at the end of the first two race segments will be kicked out of the May 18 event, being described as a ``Survival of the Fastest.''

 

``This event already offers so many different angles and so many different ways to bring excitement to an all-star event,'' defending champion Jeff Gordon said. ``Eliminating cars is certainly going to keep things exciting.''

 

In years past, the race was 70 laps and split into three segments, ending with a final 10-lap shootout and no elimination.

 

The new format stretches the race to 90 laps, with a final 20-lap shootout for a record prize of $750,000 to the winner from the $3 million purse.

 

At present, 26 cars will take the green flag for the first 40 laps. Only the top 20 will be allowed to advance to the second segment.

 

The next segment is a 30-lap race and only the top 10 finishers advance to the third leg. The final twist is that the remaining field will be inverted based on a fan vote, with either four, six, eight or all 10 cars involved.

 

The inversion makes it tricky for the drivers to plot strategy. They must finish in the top 10 to advance, but have to figure out where they want to be knowing the flip-flop is coming.

 

Winning the segment could mean starting last in the final race, said Gordon, who predicted the fans would vote to invert the entire field.

 

The elimination effect also likely will prevent sandbagging from drivers who normally held back before the final segment knowing they would get moved up to the front of the field under the inversion.

 

``The elimination of cars is going to promote the drivers to run as hard as they can to get the best finishes they can,'' Gordon said. ``Even though we're pretty sure they're going to invert all 10 in that last segment, we really don't know.

 

``If you're trying to be in that 10th-place spot, and you've got guys who know they have to be in that 10 spot to make the next event, there's going to be a lot of action going on right there.''

 

The additional 10 laps on the final segment should also change driving style.

 

``You can run pretty hard here for 10 laps before the handling starts to go away,'' Gordon said. ``Sometimes you'll see a guy break away. When you start adding 10 more laps, he's going to have to be careful how hard he pushes that car because the handling will go away and somebody can run him down.''

 

The Winston has been one of the top events of the NASCAR season since its debut in 1985. The non-points race is a dash for cash and pride only.

 

Gordon, a three-time Winston winner, said teams will tinker with their cars up until the last minute and try to get trick setups through the inspection line for a chance to win.

 

The race is rarely without trouble. Last year, there was a wreck in the first turn of the first lap when the race began before the track had fully dried following a rain storm.

 

NASCAR red-flagged the event and let the drivers involved in the accident get out their backup cars. Gordon did and went on to win the race.

 

This is the final year on Lowe's Motor Speedway's contract to host the event. The Winston has been held at Lowe's every year except 1986 and there's been talk about moving it to different tracks to add variety. The drivers oppose that because so many consider the Charlotte area home.

Posted

This should be interesting.  I'm not sure if I like it or not.  I liked the old way, but I'll find out in May how I like this one, it may be awesome, it may suck.

 

I can't wait until that weekend though.  Me, Tom, and Dad are gonna be there, and Becky is gonna go too, for her first live NASCAR Race.   Can't wait to get there.

Posted

I kinda like the elimination idea as it should prevent some or all of the sandbagging that goes on.

However, I'd like to see more than 10 cars run in the last segment.

Maybe they should start more cars from the beginning, say 35 instead of 26. Eliminate 10 after the first segment, 5 after the second, and that would leave the 20 fastest to run for the money.

I don't know, just MO.

Posted

Well, I don't know I thought that maybe they should keep more at first, but then I thought about it more.  With just 10 you don't have to worry about someone that is out of contention causing a wreck or something.  The people left are the ones that have a chance to win.  

 

And I'm not sure about this but I was thinking that there could still be more than 26 in it.  I thought that there were 24 qualified for it right now plus the 2 that will get in that evening.  Couldn't other people win between now and then and get in as well?  I'm pretty sure they could.

Posted

Rules and Eligible Drivers to date from Jaski's

 

Eligibility rules for The Winston:

1st criteria: Drivers and car owners who have won races in the current and preceding year. If a driver leaves a team with which he has won a race, he remains eligible and the car owner's new driver also is eligible(through the last race before The Winston)

2nd criteria: Drivers who are past Winston Cup champions

3rd criteria: Drivers who have won The Winston in the last 5 years(1997-2001)

4th criteria: The winning driver of the Winston Open

5th criteria: The winning driver of the Winston Open "No Bull 5 Sprint", run after the Winston Open

6th criteria: Drivers who have won in previous years, not eligible by the above(not owners, just drivers)

THIS IS ONLY IF THERE ARE NOT 20 ELIGIBLE ALREADY

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Current 2002 Field

 Driver Eligibility

Race winners(owners) in 2001 and 2002

1 Michael Waltrip 2001 Daytona 500

2 Steve Park   Kenny Wallace if Park not back (Wallace still on standby)  2001 Rockingham

3 Jeff Gordon 2001 Las Vegas

4 Kevin Harvick 2001 Cracker Barrel 500, Atlanta

5 Dale Jarrett 2001 Darlington

6 Elliott Sadler 2001 Food City 500, Bristol

7 Bobby Hamilton 2001 Talladega 500, Talladega

8 Rusty Wallace 2001 California

9 Tony Stewart 2001 Richmond

10 Jeff Burton 2001 Coca-Cola 600

11 Ricky Rudd 2001 Pocono 500

12 Dale Earnhardt Jr 2001 Pepsi 400 at Daytona

13 Bobby Labonte 2001 Pennsylvania 500

14 Sterling Marlin 2001 Michigan Pepsi 400

15 Ward Burton 2001 Southern 500

16 Ricky Craven 2001 Martinsville(2)

17 Joe Nemechek 2001 Rockingham(2)

18 Bill Elliott 2001 Homestead

19 Robby Gordon 2001 NHIS(nov)

20 #33 APR Chevy ? Mike Wallace 2001 Rockingham(2)

21 Matt Kenseth 2002 Rockingham

22 Kurt Busch 2002 Bristol

 

Previous NASCAR Winston Cup champions

(not a 2001/2002 winner)

23 Terry Labonte 1996

 

 

Previous Winners of The Winston(1997-2001)

(not a 2001/2002 winner)

24 Mark Martin 1998 The Winston Win

 

 

and....

25 2002 Winston Open Winner  

26 2002 Winston Open "No Bull 5 Sprint" Winner

 

 

 

From what I read here, it sounds like there can still be more drivers in it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is this the pan everyone is talking about PPE Power 128051910 . this can be gotten from JEGS. 
    • My truck is a 2024 2500 LT crew cab with the 6.6 gas engine and 10 speed trans.  It has a payload of 3578 lbs.  We pull a 22' Grand Design 17MKE that has dry weight of 5006 lbs. and a gross weight of 6395 lbs.  The trailer weighs about 5800 lbs. when loaded up with all the gear.  I don't fill the water tank for travel as most of our trips are to state parks that are within a day's drive.  Depending on the wind I get anywhere from 7.5 to 9 mpg.  I do use a weight distribution hitch (WDH) and have no problems with sway or being pulled/pushed side to side by 18-wheelers passing by me.  The trailer is about the same length of the truck so that helps a lot.  I say that because we traded in our 33' Grand Design 2670 MK (7800 lbs. loaded with gear) and using the same WDH, it would get pulled side to side by big trucks passing by me. It was not bad, but you needed to stay alert and know when a big truck was pulling up beside you.  I got about 7 to 8 mpg pulling that trailer.  I normally drive about 65 to 67 mph when pulling.  Overall, I love the payload capability of the truck as I doubt I will ever get close to its limit and I love the stability it offers over a half ton truck while pulling a trailer.  I have just over 30000 miles on the truck and have not had any issues.  We live in Texas where it is relatively flat, just windy. 
    • I will say though that the 5.00 a gallon for only one fuel stop while on the Number 1, that privilege of driving from the point of Paso Robles ( where I fueled up before crossing to the coast ) and all the way up ... across the Golden Gate where I stopped and walked on the bridge ( and someone jumped off the bridge opposite the side I was on ... never saw it happen but the tow truck/paramedic told me ) and continued on north back onto No 1 and all the way up to where it connects to 101 and also explored some of the Red Woods although had been through some of that before. The fantastic view of that scenic ocean route was most certainly worth the extra dollars I spent on fuel. Just prior to that I had driven through Death Valley and that was some experience in the middle of July, then spent a couple of days in Yosemite and hiked to the top of Half Dome. The summer of 2007 was very memorable for what I saw and experienced in California.
    • Really depends on what extent the towing is.  Are you going across the country on highways or to fairly local campgrounds?  If you're just local towing then I wouldn't derate your truck much, just make sure the weight of your trailer and equipment stays below your limit.  Which for my truck is 14500lbs bumper pull.  Yeah it will work hard when you're over 5 figures in weight but who cares if it is just say 50 miles.    In my opinion the main thing with towing campers is wind resistance.  My 3200lb single axle camper tows fairly hard for what it is due to the wind.  But then if I use my truck to tow a family members 8000lb camper it doesn't really feel any different as wind resistance is similar. I've also towed a 5000lb airstream and it barely felt like anything was there.
    • I think the excitement has run its course. Or, probably need a break from the truck for a few days.   Win some, lose some, again. There was still a coolant weep from the front of the engine. This time it was one of those worm-drive hose clamps on the upper hose connecting to the water neck. There's a reason the factory doesn't use those type of clamps; they suck. The hose is all distorted and flared at the end from someone over-tightening it. The water neck just needed to be cleaned, hose seated, and have a *good* hose clamp put on, if the hose wasn't so mangled.   Thought I'd kill two birds with one stone and try to diagnose the EGR issue. It's likely a failed EGR but before I spent $85 on the part I wanted to make sure ports weren't clogged or the pintle wasn't stuck. It was kind of a bugger to remove with the upper intake installed. Re-install (because I wanted to drive it) proved more difficult.   Per the stack of service paperwork, the EGR has already been replaced 4 times since 1996.   It would reason, then, that the EGR flange on the lower intake manifold has had its share of techs trying to work quickly and maybe one of them seated a bolt slightly cross-threaded at one time. The bolt didn't come out without significant effort and tried as I did, it wouldn't go in without significant effort. And then, the mounting ear on the right side of the EGR (lower intake casting) cracked, and crumbled off. $%&@!!!   I hate everything. Or, at least, I did in that moment. I was pretty calm, considering. This is what older, junky vehicles do. They nickel and dime their owners, piss them off, and things break that shouldn't break because of shoddy design/workmanship, poorly done repairs.   If I want to make it right, I'll need to replace the lower intake manifold and basically re-do everything I spent days doing. At least it should go quicker this time, right?! Looks like a lower intake (used/junk, of course) will run me about $150.   Once I get the new EGR, I'll see if I can bolt it up snug enough to verify proper operation, and if it solves the persistent CEL that sets on decel for EGR flow, I'll know I'm back on the right track. And then I can decide how to proceed.   Also, an idler pulley has given up. It began squeaking in pain on startup. It's clear this truck hasn't been thoroughly driven in a long, long time as things are just letting go and shaking out. I may have given it the beans once or twice to make sure my intake gaskets were doing their job. Flog an old vehicle, expect what it gives in return.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...