Jump to content

04 Yukon 8.1


Recommended Posts

Posted

im trying to do a tru 3" on this truck, and am not sure about these cats theres a sensor right after each one, can i eliminate them and not have a "check engine light"

Posted

These truck normally have 4 O2 sensors 2 before the CAT's and 2 after. The easiest way to "remove" the 2 after the CAT is get a tune with them being "turned off". That is what I had done as part of my tune. The 2 O2 sensors prior to the CAT are needed as they provide alot of information to the computer so the truck can run properly.

Posted

Ok, so its not a big deal, when i remove them before the tune what will i have to deal with? a check engine light i can deal with as long as it runs ok until the tune

Posted
Yes, it should run fine. But the CEL will stay on until you get a tune to get rid of it.

 

+1, just like after gutting the cats. If the light bugs you or you need to pass visual inspection before you get it tuned, you could look into getting some cheap spark plug defoulers (effectively spacers) that lift the rear O2 sensors just out of the pipe to where they won't report a problem.

Posted

The truck will throw a code, and check engine light will come on. I am not sure what the long term effects it will have with the code being stored in the PCM. I have heard many different things about having a check engine light stay on and how it effects the car, ie: will it go into a "limp home" mode etc..?? Since I am not a tuner or programmer I really don't know. I just know that if the light stays on, there lies a possiblity that another engine/trans problem may come up, but since your check engine light is already on you may not know of the "new" problem. For me I would just tell you to get the tune, and get it done. Most of the tuners have no issues with giving you updates to their tuned PCM for free. I know with my Wheatley tune, I can always send my PCM back and get it retuned for larger tires, or change it from a 87 octane to a 92 octane tune. Hopefully this helps.

Posted

thanks alot guys. i wish i knew more about the :spark plug defoulers" do they just take the place of the o2 sensor?

Posted
thanks alot guys. i wish i knew more about the :spark plug defoulers" do they just take the place of the o2 sensor?

 

I found this picture on Google images. That shinier part on the right side of the O2 sensor is a spark plug defouler. It is nothing more than a spacer - you thread your O2 sensor into it, and then re-install back into your rear O2 sensor holes. Piece of cake, and just a few dollars at your local auto parts store and a few minutes of your time.

 

headerswcatsxs9.jpg

Posted

talked with auto parts store today about the defoulers, theyhave some there but.. the sparkplug thread is 14mm and the 02 sensor is 18mm so how can i get this to work

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,759 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...