Jump to content

Center Console 7" Widescreen LCD


bzb

Recommended Posts

Posted

My apologies if this is in the wrong forum.

 

I posted questions asking about putting a DVD system and/or a LCD into the center console a while back... and I ended up getting two systems cuz I'm too dang picky ;)

 

I ended up getting a Boss DVD head unit, 4 channel amp, mono sub amp, and various other things. Also ended up buying this:

 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...MEBWN%3AIT&rd=1

 

The seller is very bad about answering e-mails about returns, doubt he'll take it back anyway... so I'm looking to sell it. It's a month used now, looks good installed.

 

It has a strange bit of factory good on the front bottom left, you can't really see it when it's installed tho. It also has one single dead pixel that I don't really notice unless I'm looking for it.

 

It hooked up fine, looks good down there. You can see it from front and back seats in the Tahoe. Very bright during daylight, no problems with haze or weird angles making it look bad. Also has the remote to change settings.

 

The back of it, as someone else said, is very cheesy. It's black plastic, obviously from a handmade mold. The LCD casing was removed at the factory and siliconed into the bezel. The back has a RCA in, 12v, ground, and a power lead so it will turn on when the head unit is on.

 

Anyway, I'm looking to sell the LCD and possibly the head unit (if my friend doesn't want it), as I've upgraded (ALREADY!) to a Pioneer flip up screen unit. Anyone wanting it, I'm looking for around $200 for it, shipped. Figure I'd offer to you guys first since you all would be more apt to wanting this than the generic ebay crowd!

 

Thanks!

 

- Bobby (bzb)

Posted

hmm

 

you got me thinkin

 

got any pics showing the dead pixel?

 

also does it have video inputs and outputs?

Posted

I have pics on my work computer of the install, I'll try to post them later today.

 

It has one RCA input... I've never heard of an LCD screen having an output though.

 

The Boss unit has both input and outputs, but my friend has ended up wanting the unit for his Durango :lol:

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,964 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...